Efficacy of noninvasive ventilation on in-hospital mortality in patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema

a meta-analysis

Tongwen Sun, Youdong Wan, Quancheng Kan, Fei Yang, Haimu Yao, Fangxia Guan, Jinying Zhang, Ling Li

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of noninvasive ventilation on in-hospital mortality in adult patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema (ACPE). Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Wanfang, CNKI data to find relevant randomized controlled trials of noninvasive ventilation for ACPE, which were reported from January 1980 to December 2012. Meta-analysis was performed with software of RevMan 5.1. Results: According to inclusive criteria and exclusion criteria, 35 randomized controlled trials with 3204 patients were enrolled for analyses. Meta-analysis of the trials showed that continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) reduced in-hospital mortality by 43% (RR=0.57, 95% CI 0.43-0.75, P<0.01) and bilevel positive pressure ventilatio n(BiPAP) reduced mortality by 31% (RR=0.69,95% CI 0.51-0.94, P=0.02) compared with standard therapy. There were no significant differences in in-hospital mortality between BiPAP and CPAP (RR=1.09, 95% CI 0.80-1.49, P=0.57) and myocardial infarction rate (BiPAP vs. CPAP: RR=1.20, 95% CI 0.95-1.52, P=0.12; BiPAP vs. standard therapy: RR=1.10, 95% CI 0.88-1.38, P=0.40). Conclusion: Noninvasive ventilation (BiPAP and CPAP) could reduce in-hospital mortality of adult patients with ACPE, which could be used as first-line management strategies for these patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)161-168
Number of pages8
JournalChinese Journal of Cardiology
Volume42
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Noninvasive Ventilation
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
Pulmonary Edema
Hospital Mortality
Meta-Analysis
Randomized Controlled Trials
PubMed
Software
Myocardial Infarction
Pressure
Mortality
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Mortality
  • Positive-pressure respiration
  • Pulmonary edema

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Efficacy of noninvasive ventilation on in-hospital mortality in patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema : a meta-analysis. / Sun, Tongwen; Wan, Youdong; Kan, Quancheng; Yang, Fei; Yao, Haimu; Guan, Fangxia; Zhang, Jinying; Li, Ling.

In: Chinese Journal of Cardiology, Vol. 42, No. 2, 2014, p. 161-168.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sun, Tongwen ; Wan, Youdong ; Kan, Quancheng ; Yang, Fei ; Yao, Haimu ; Guan, Fangxia ; Zhang, Jinying ; Li, Ling. / Efficacy of noninvasive ventilation on in-hospital mortality in patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema : a meta-analysis. In: Chinese Journal of Cardiology. 2014 ; Vol. 42, No. 2. pp. 161-168.
@article{e8b50ea804304dc0832c7ec3146605a6,
title = "Efficacy of noninvasive ventilation on in-hospital mortality in patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema: a meta-analysis",
abstract = "Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of noninvasive ventilation on in-hospital mortality in adult patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema (ACPE). Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Wanfang, CNKI data to find relevant randomized controlled trials of noninvasive ventilation for ACPE, which were reported from January 1980 to December 2012. Meta-analysis was performed with software of RevMan 5.1. Results: According to inclusive criteria and exclusion criteria, 35 randomized controlled trials with 3204 patients were enrolled for analyses. Meta-analysis of the trials showed that continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) reduced in-hospital mortality by 43{\%} (RR=0.57, 95{\%} CI 0.43-0.75, P<0.01) and bilevel positive pressure ventilatio n(BiPAP) reduced mortality by 31{\%} (RR=0.69,95{\%} CI 0.51-0.94, P=0.02) compared with standard therapy. There were no significant differences in in-hospital mortality between BiPAP and CPAP (RR=1.09, 95{\%} CI 0.80-1.49, P=0.57) and myocardial infarction rate (BiPAP vs. CPAP: RR=1.20, 95{\%} CI 0.95-1.52, P=0.12; BiPAP vs. standard therapy: RR=1.10, 95{\%} CI 0.88-1.38, P=0.40). Conclusion: Noninvasive ventilation (BiPAP and CPAP) could reduce in-hospital mortality of adult patients with ACPE, which could be used as first-line management strategies for these patients.",
keywords = "Mortality, Positive-pressure respiration, Pulmonary edema",
author = "Tongwen Sun and Youdong Wan and Quancheng Kan and Fei Yang and Haimu Yao and Fangxia Guan and Jinying Zhang and Ling Li",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2014.02.013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "161--168",
journal = "Chinese Journal of Cardiology",
issn = "0253-3758",
publisher = "Chinese Medical Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Efficacy of noninvasive ventilation on in-hospital mortality in patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema

T2 - a meta-analysis

AU - Sun, Tongwen

AU - Wan, Youdong

AU - Kan, Quancheng

AU - Yang, Fei

AU - Yao, Haimu

AU - Guan, Fangxia

AU - Zhang, Jinying

AU - Li, Ling

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of noninvasive ventilation on in-hospital mortality in adult patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema (ACPE). Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Wanfang, CNKI data to find relevant randomized controlled trials of noninvasive ventilation for ACPE, which were reported from January 1980 to December 2012. Meta-analysis was performed with software of RevMan 5.1. Results: According to inclusive criteria and exclusion criteria, 35 randomized controlled trials with 3204 patients were enrolled for analyses. Meta-analysis of the trials showed that continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) reduced in-hospital mortality by 43% (RR=0.57, 95% CI 0.43-0.75, P<0.01) and bilevel positive pressure ventilatio n(BiPAP) reduced mortality by 31% (RR=0.69,95% CI 0.51-0.94, P=0.02) compared with standard therapy. There were no significant differences in in-hospital mortality between BiPAP and CPAP (RR=1.09, 95% CI 0.80-1.49, P=0.57) and myocardial infarction rate (BiPAP vs. CPAP: RR=1.20, 95% CI 0.95-1.52, P=0.12; BiPAP vs. standard therapy: RR=1.10, 95% CI 0.88-1.38, P=0.40). Conclusion: Noninvasive ventilation (BiPAP and CPAP) could reduce in-hospital mortality of adult patients with ACPE, which could be used as first-line management strategies for these patients.

AB - Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of noninvasive ventilation on in-hospital mortality in adult patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema (ACPE). Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Wanfang, CNKI data to find relevant randomized controlled trials of noninvasive ventilation for ACPE, which were reported from January 1980 to December 2012. Meta-analysis was performed with software of RevMan 5.1. Results: According to inclusive criteria and exclusion criteria, 35 randomized controlled trials with 3204 patients were enrolled for analyses. Meta-analysis of the trials showed that continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) reduced in-hospital mortality by 43% (RR=0.57, 95% CI 0.43-0.75, P<0.01) and bilevel positive pressure ventilatio n(BiPAP) reduced mortality by 31% (RR=0.69,95% CI 0.51-0.94, P=0.02) compared with standard therapy. There were no significant differences in in-hospital mortality between BiPAP and CPAP (RR=1.09, 95% CI 0.80-1.49, P=0.57) and myocardial infarction rate (BiPAP vs. CPAP: RR=1.20, 95% CI 0.95-1.52, P=0.12; BiPAP vs. standard therapy: RR=1.10, 95% CI 0.88-1.38, P=0.40). Conclusion: Noninvasive ventilation (BiPAP and CPAP) could reduce in-hospital mortality of adult patients with ACPE, which could be used as first-line management strategies for these patients.

KW - Mortality

KW - Positive-pressure respiration

KW - Pulmonary edema

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896282491&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896282491&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2014.02.013

DO - 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2014.02.013

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 161

EP - 168

JO - Chinese Journal of Cardiology

JF - Chinese Journal of Cardiology

SN - 0253-3758

IS - 2

ER -