TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of telephone calls from primary care practices on follow-up visits after pediatric emergency department visits
T2 - Evidence from the Pediatric Emergency Department Links to Primary Care (PEDLPC) randomized controlled trial
AU - Racine, Andrew D.
AU - Alderman, Elizabeth M.
AU - Avner, Jeffrey R.
PY - 2009/6
Y1 - 2009/6
N2 - Objective: To test whether follow-up phone calls to counsel families about pediatric emergency department (PED) use and primary care availability made after an index PED visit would modify subsequent PED use. Design: Longitudinal prospective randomized intervention. Setting: An urban academic children's hospital. Patients: A total of 4246 individuals aged 0 to 21 years from each of 4 participating primary care practices recording an index PED visit from April through December 2005. Intervention: Follow-up phone call from the primary care practice within 72 hours of the initial PED visit to counsel about the availability of after-hours advice and when to access the PED. Main Outcome Measures: All subsequent visits to primary care practices, PED, pediatric subspecialists, or for inpatient hospitalization during a 365-day follow-up period. Logistic and ordinary least squares regressions estimated unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios of follow-up visits, controlling for covariates. Results: Of the 2166 intervention subjects, 816 (37.7%) recorded follow-up PED visits compared with 819 (39.4%) of the 2080 control subjects (P=.26, not significant). The adjusted odds of a follow-up visit being to the PED rather than to another venue was significantly less for intervention than for control subjects (odds ratio, 0.88; confidence interval, 0.82-0.94), indicating decreased intensity of PED use. Conclusion: Follow-up phone calls from primary care practices after PED visits counseling patients on the use of primary care and emergency services can modulate subsequent care-seeking behavior and decrease future PED use.
AB - Objective: To test whether follow-up phone calls to counsel families about pediatric emergency department (PED) use and primary care availability made after an index PED visit would modify subsequent PED use. Design: Longitudinal prospective randomized intervention. Setting: An urban academic children's hospital. Patients: A total of 4246 individuals aged 0 to 21 years from each of 4 participating primary care practices recording an index PED visit from April through December 2005. Intervention: Follow-up phone call from the primary care practice within 72 hours of the initial PED visit to counsel about the availability of after-hours advice and when to access the PED. Main Outcome Measures: All subsequent visits to primary care practices, PED, pediatric subspecialists, or for inpatient hospitalization during a 365-day follow-up period. Logistic and ordinary least squares regressions estimated unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios of follow-up visits, controlling for covariates. Results: Of the 2166 intervention subjects, 816 (37.7%) recorded follow-up PED visits compared with 819 (39.4%) of the 2080 control subjects (P=.26, not significant). The adjusted odds of a follow-up visit being to the PED rather than to another venue was significantly less for intervention than for control subjects (odds ratio, 0.88; confidence interval, 0.82-0.94), indicating decreased intensity of PED use. Conclusion: Follow-up phone calls from primary care practices after PED visits counseling patients on the use of primary care and emergency services can modulate subsequent care-seeking behavior and decrease future PED use.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=66349124678&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=66349124678&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.45
DO - 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.45
M3 - Article
C2 - 19487605
AN - SCOPUS:66349124678
SN - 2168-6203
VL - 163
SP - 505
EP - 511
JO - A.M.A. American journal of diseases of children
JF - A.M.A. American journal of diseases of children
IS - 6
ER -