Dual-focus mutual aid for co-occurring disorders

A quasi-experimental outcome evaluation study

Stephen Magura, Andrew Rosenblum, Cherie L. Villano, Howard S. Vogel, Chunki Fong, Thomas F. Betzler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous observational research has indicated the effectiveness of a 12-step, dual-focus mutual aid group, Double Trouble in Recovery (DTR), for assisting individuals to recover from co-occurring substance use and psychiatric disorders. The current study extends this line of research by evaluating DTR with a quasi-experimental design; controlled designs are rare in studies of mutual aid. Patient outcomes in the same psychiatric day treatment program were compared for two consecutive admission cohorts characterized by high rates of co-occurring disorders. The first cohort did not have DTR available while the second cohort was exposed to DTR after it was established at the program. Both cohorts were assessed at program admission and at a six-month follow-up. Using intent to treat analysis, the Post-DTR cohort as compared with the Pre-DTR cohort had significantly fewer days of alcohol and drug use, more frequent traditional 12-step groups outside of the program and higher psychiatric medication adherence. There were no differences in psychiatric symptoms or program retention, however. This study helps demonstrate the benefits of introducing 12-step, dual-focus mutual aid into psychiatric treatment programs that serve patients with co-occurring disorders.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)61-74
Number of pages14
JournalAmerican Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2008

Fingerprint

Psychiatry
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Medication Adherence
Research
Substance-Related Disorders
Research Design
Alcohols
Therapeutics
Pharmaceutical Preparations

Keywords

  • 12-step groups
  • Co-occurring disorders
  • Mental illness
  • Mutual aid
  • Program evaluation
  • Self-help
  • Substance abuse
  • Treatment outcomes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics(all)
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Dual-focus mutual aid for co-occurring disorders : A quasi-experimental outcome evaluation study. / Magura, Stephen; Rosenblum, Andrew; Villano, Cherie L.; Vogel, Howard S.; Fong, Chunki; Betzler, Thomas F.

In: American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, Vol. 34, No. 1, 01.2008, p. 61-74.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Magura, Stephen ; Rosenblum, Andrew ; Villano, Cherie L. ; Vogel, Howard S. ; Fong, Chunki ; Betzler, Thomas F. / Dual-focus mutual aid for co-occurring disorders : A quasi-experimental outcome evaluation study. In: American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. 2008 ; Vol. 34, No. 1. pp. 61-74.
@article{5037a2d9a18240b9ac740dc00bb5e4c4,
title = "Dual-focus mutual aid for co-occurring disorders: A quasi-experimental outcome evaluation study",
abstract = "Previous observational research has indicated the effectiveness of a 12-step, dual-focus mutual aid group, Double Trouble in Recovery (DTR), for assisting individuals to recover from co-occurring substance use and psychiatric disorders. The current study extends this line of research by evaluating DTR with a quasi-experimental design; controlled designs are rare in studies of mutual aid. Patient outcomes in the same psychiatric day treatment program were compared for two consecutive admission cohorts characterized by high rates of co-occurring disorders. The first cohort did not have DTR available while the second cohort was exposed to DTR after it was established at the program. Both cohorts were assessed at program admission and at a six-month follow-up. Using intent to treat analysis, the Post-DTR cohort as compared with the Pre-DTR cohort had significantly fewer days of alcohol and drug use, more frequent traditional 12-step groups outside of the program and higher psychiatric medication adherence. There were no differences in psychiatric symptoms or program retention, however. This study helps demonstrate the benefits of introducing 12-step, dual-focus mutual aid into psychiatric treatment programs that serve patients with co-occurring disorders.",
keywords = "12-step groups, Co-occurring disorders, Mental illness, Mutual aid, Program evaluation, Self-help, Substance abuse, Treatment outcomes",
author = "Stephen Magura and Andrew Rosenblum and Villano, {Cherie L.} and Vogel, {Howard S.} and Chunki Fong and Betzler, {Thomas F.}",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1080/00952990701764623",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "61--74",
journal = "American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse",
issn = "0095-2990",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dual-focus mutual aid for co-occurring disorders

T2 - A quasi-experimental outcome evaluation study

AU - Magura, Stephen

AU - Rosenblum, Andrew

AU - Villano, Cherie L.

AU - Vogel, Howard S.

AU - Fong, Chunki

AU - Betzler, Thomas F.

PY - 2008/1

Y1 - 2008/1

N2 - Previous observational research has indicated the effectiveness of a 12-step, dual-focus mutual aid group, Double Trouble in Recovery (DTR), for assisting individuals to recover from co-occurring substance use and psychiatric disorders. The current study extends this line of research by evaluating DTR with a quasi-experimental design; controlled designs are rare in studies of mutual aid. Patient outcomes in the same psychiatric day treatment program were compared for two consecutive admission cohorts characterized by high rates of co-occurring disorders. The first cohort did not have DTR available while the second cohort was exposed to DTR after it was established at the program. Both cohorts were assessed at program admission and at a six-month follow-up. Using intent to treat analysis, the Post-DTR cohort as compared with the Pre-DTR cohort had significantly fewer days of alcohol and drug use, more frequent traditional 12-step groups outside of the program and higher psychiatric medication adherence. There were no differences in psychiatric symptoms or program retention, however. This study helps demonstrate the benefits of introducing 12-step, dual-focus mutual aid into psychiatric treatment programs that serve patients with co-occurring disorders.

AB - Previous observational research has indicated the effectiveness of a 12-step, dual-focus mutual aid group, Double Trouble in Recovery (DTR), for assisting individuals to recover from co-occurring substance use and psychiatric disorders. The current study extends this line of research by evaluating DTR with a quasi-experimental design; controlled designs are rare in studies of mutual aid. Patient outcomes in the same psychiatric day treatment program were compared for two consecutive admission cohorts characterized by high rates of co-occurring disorders. The first cohort did not have DTR available while the second cohort was exposed to DTR after it was established at the program. Both cohorts were assessed at program admission and at a six-month follow-up. Using intent to treat analysis, the Post-DTR cohort as compared with the Pre-DTR cohort had significantly fewer days of alcohol and drug use, more frequent traditional 12-step groups outside of the program and higher psychiatric medication adherence. There were no differences in psychiatric symptoms or program retention, however. This study helps demonstrate the benefits of introducing 12-step, dual-focus mutual aid into psychiatric treatment programs that serve patients with co-occurring disorders.

KW - 12-step groups

KW - Co-occurring disorders

KW - Mental illness

KW - Mutual aid

KW - Program evaluation

KW - Self-help

KW - Substance abuse

KW - Treatment outcomes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=37649004102&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=37649004102&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00952990701764623

DO - 10.1080/00952990701764623

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 61

EP - 74

JO - American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse

JF - American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse

SN - 0095-2990

IS - 1

ER -