Dual-console robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic surgery with respect to surgical outcomes in a gynecologic oncology fellowship program

Ashlee L. Smith, Thomas C. Krivak, Eirwen M. Scott, Jose Alejandro Rauh-Hain, Paniti Sukumvanich, Alexander B. Olawaiye, Scott D. Richard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Minimally invasive surgical techniques decrease surgical morbidity and recovery time. Studies demonstrate similar surgical outcomes comparing robotic to laparoscopic surgery. These studies have not accounted for the incorporation of fellow education. With the dual-console da Vinci Si Surgical System®, a two surgeon approach could be performed. We sought to compare surgical outcomes at a gynecologic oncology fellowship program of traditional laparoscopic to robotic surgeries using the dual-console system. Methods: We identified patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic surgery performed by a gynecologic oncologist from November 2009-November 2010. Robotic surgeries were conducted using the dual-console, utilizing a two surgeon approach. Surgeries involved a staff physician with a gynecologic oncology fellow. Statistical analysis was performed using student t-test and chi-squared analysis. Results: A total of 222 cases were identified. Cases were analyzed in groups: all cases identified, all cancer cases, and endometrial cancer cases only. When analyzing all cases, no statistical difference was noted in total operating room time (172 vs. 175 min; p = 0.6), pelvic lymph nodes removed (10.1 vs. 9.6; p = 0.69), para-aortic lymph nodes dissected (3.7 vs. 3.8; p = 0.91), or length of stay (1.5 vs. 1.3 days; p = 0.3). There was a significant difference in total surgical time (131 vs.110 min; p < 0.0001) and EBL (157 vs.94 ml; p < 0.0001), favoring robotic surgery. When analyzing all cancer cases, the advantage in total surgical time for robotic surgery was lost. Complications were similar between cohorts. Conclusion: Incorporating fellow education into robotic surgery does not adversely affect outcomes when compared to traditional laparoscopic surgery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)432-436
Number of pages5
JournalGynecologic Oncology
Volume126
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Robotics
Laparoscopy
Operative Time
Lymph Nodes
Education
Operating Rooms
Endometrial Neoplasms
Length of Stay
Neoplasms
Students
Morbidity
Physicians

Keywords

  • Dual-console robotic surgery
  • Fellowship training program
  • Gynecologic oncology
  • Laparoscopic surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Oncology

Cite this

Smith, A. L., Krivak, T. C., Scott, E. M., Rauh-Hain, J. A., Sukumvanich, P., Olawaiye, A. B., & Richard, S. D. (2012). Dual-console robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic surgery with respect to surgical outcomes in a gynecologic oncology fellowship program. Gynecologic Oncology, 126(3), 432-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.05.017

Dual-console robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic surgery with respect to surgical outcomes in a gynecologic oncology fellowship program. / Smith, Ashlee L.; Krivak, Thomas C.; Scott, Eirwen M.; Rauh-Hain, Jose Alejandro; Sukumvanich, Paniti; Olawaiye, Alexander B.; Richard, Scott D.

In: Gynecologic Oncology, Vol. 126, No. 3, 09.2012, p. 432-436.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Smith, Ashlee L. ; Krivak, Thomas C. ; Scott, Eirwen M. ; Rauh-Hain, Jose Alejandro ; Sukumvanich, Paniti ; Olawaiye, Alexander B. ; Richard, Scott D. / Dual-console robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic surgery with respect to surgical outcomes in a gynecologic oncology fellowship program. In: Gynecologic Oncology. 2012 ; Vol. 126, No. 3. pp. 432-436.
@article{93127877d7ce4a76a8624c267525ca33,
title = "Dual-console robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic surgery with respect to surgical outcomes in a gynecologic oncology fellowship program",
abstract = "Objective: Minimally invasive surgical techniques decrease surgical morbidity and recovery time. Studies demonstrate similar surgical outcomes comparing robotic to laparoscopic surgery. These studies have not accounted for the incorporation of fellow education. With the dual-console da Vinci Si Surgical System{\circledR}, a two surgeon approach could be performed. We sought to compare surgical outcomes at a gynecologic oncology fellowship program of traditional laparoscopic to robotic surgeries using the dual-console system. Methods: We identified patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic surgery performed by a gynecologic oncologist from November 2009-November 2010. Robotic surgeries were conducted using the dual-console, utilizing a two surgeon approach. Surgeries involved a staff physician with a gynecologic oncology fellow. Statistical analysis was performed using student t-test and chi-squared analysis. Results: A total of 222 cases were identified. Cases were analyzed in groups: all cases identified, all cancer cases, and endometrial cancer cases only. When analyzing all cases, no statistical difference was noted in total operating room time (172 vs. 175 min; p = 0.6), pelvic lymph nodes removed (10.1 vs. 9.6; p = 0.69), para-aortic lymph nodes dissected (3.7 vs. 3.8; p = 0.91), or length of stay (1.5 vs. 1.3 days; p = 0.3). There was a significant difference in total surgical time (131 vs.110 min; p < 0.0001) and EBL (157 vs.94 ml; p < 0.0001), favoring robotic surgery. When analyzing all cancer cases, the advantage in total surgical time for robotic surgery was lost. Complications were similar between cohorts. Conclusion: Incorporating fellow education into robotic surgery does not adversely affect outcomes when compared to traditional laparoscopic surgery.",
keywords = "Dual-console robotic surgery, Fellowship training program, Gynecologic oncology, Laparoscopic surgery",
author = "Smith, {Ashlee L.} and Krivak, {Thomas C.} and Scott, {Eirwen M.} and Rauh-Hain, {Jose Alejandro} and Paniti Sukumvanich and Olawaiye, {Alexander B.} and Richard, {Scott D.}",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.05.017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "126",
pages = "432--436",
journal = "Gynecologic Oncology",
issn = "0090-8258",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dual-console robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic surgery with respect to surgical outcomes in a gynecologic oncology fellowship program

AU - Smith, Ashlee L.

AU - Krivak, Thomas C.

AU - Scott, Eirwen M.

AU - Rauh-Hain, Jose Alejandro

AU - Sukumvanich, Paniti

AU - Olawaiye, Alexander B.

AU - Richard, Scott D.

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - Objective: Minimally invasive surgical techniques decrease surgical morbidity and recovery time. Studies demonstrate similar surgical outcomes comparing robotic to laparoscopic surgery. These studies have not accounted for the incorporation of fellow education. With the dual-console da Vinci Si Surgical System®, a two surgeon approach could be performed. We sought to compare surgical outcomes at a gynecologic oncology fellowship program of traditional laparoscopic to robotic surgeries using the dual-console system. Methods: We identified patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic surgery performed by a gynecologic oncologist from November 2009-November 2010. Robotic surgeries were conducted using the dual-console, utilizing a two surgeon approach. Surgeries involved a staff physician with a gynecologic oncology fellow. Statistical analysis was performed using student t-test and chi-squared analysis. Results: A total of 222 cases were identified. Cases were analyzed in groups: all cases identified, all cancer cases, and endometrial cancer cases only. When analyzing all cases, no statistical difference was noted in total operating room time (172 vs. 175 min; p = 0.6), pelvic lymph nodes removed (10.1 vs. 9.6; p = 0.69), para-aortic lymph nodes dissected (3.7 vs. 3.8; p = 0.91), or length of stay (1.5 vs. 1.3 days; p = 0.3). There was a significant difference in total surgical time (131 vs.110 min; p < 0.0001) and EBL (157 vs.94 ml; p < 0.0001), favoring robotic surgery. When analyzing all cancer cases, the advantage in total surgical time for robotic surgery was lost. Complications were similar between cohorts. Conclusion: Incorporating fellow education into robotic surgery does not adversely affect outcomes when compared to traditional laparoscopic surgery.

AB - Objective: Minimally invasive surgical techniques decrease surgical morbidity and recovery time. Studies demonstrate similar surgical outcomes comparing robotic to laparoscopic surgery. These studies have not accounted for the incorporation of fellow education. With the dual-console da Vinci Si Surgical System®, a two surgeon approach could be performed. We sought to compare surgical outcomes at a gynecologic oncology fellowship program of traditional laparoscopic to robotic surgeries using the dual-console system. Methods: We identified patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic surgery performed by a gynecologic oncologist from November 2009-November 2010. Robotic surgeries were conducted using the dual-console, utilizing a two surgeon approach. Surgeries involved a staff physician with a gynecologic oncology fellow. Statistical analysis was performed using student t-test and chi-squared analysis. Results: A total of 222 cases were identified. Cases were analyzed in groups: all cases identified, all cancer cases, and endometrial cancer cases only. When analyzing all cases, no statistical difference was noted in total operating room time (172 vs. 175 min; p = 0.6), pelvic lymph nodes removed (10.1 vs. 9.6; p = 0.69), para-aortic lymph nodes dissected (3.7 vs. 3.8; p = 0.91), or length of stay (1.5 vs. 1.3 days; p = 0.3). There was a significant difference in total surgical time (131 vs.110 min; p < 0.0001) and EBL (157 vs.94 ml; p < 0.0001), favoring robotic surgery. When analyzing all cancer cases, the advantage in total surgical time for robotic surgery was lost. Complications were similar between cohorts. Conclusion: Incorporating fellow education into robotic surgery does not adversely affect outcomes when compared to traditional laparoscopic surgery.

KW - Dual-console robotic surgery

KW - Fellowship training program

KW - Gynecologic oncology

KW - Laparoscopic surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864407674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864407674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.05.017

DO - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.05.017

M3 - Article

VL - 126

SP - 432

EP - 436

JO - Gynecologic Oncology

JF - Gynecologic Oncology

SN - 0090-8258

IS - 3

ER -