Doubling of 30-day mortality by 90 days after esophagectomy: A critica l measure of outcomes for quality improvement

Haejin In, Bryan E. Palis, Ryan P. Merkow, Mitchell C. Posner, Mark K. Ferguson, David P. Winchester, Christopher M. Pezzi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Our objectives were to (1) compare 30-and 90-day mortality rates after esophagectomy, (2) compare drivers of 30-and 90-day mortality, and (3) examine whether 90-day mortality affects hospital rankings. Background: Operative mortality has traditionally been assessed at 30 days. Ninety-day mortality has been suggested as a more appropriate indicator of quality, particularly after complex cancer surgery. Methods: Esophagectomies for nonmetastatic esophageal cancer patients diagnosed between 2007 and 2011 were identified in the National Cancer Data Base. Mortality rates were examined by patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and hospital procedural volume. Risk-adjusted hierarchical logistic regression models examined hospital performance for mortality. Results: A total of 15,796 esophagectomy patients at 977 hospitals were available for analysis. Ninety-day overall mortality was more than double the 30-day mortality (8.9% vs 4.2%; P <0.0001). In multivariate analysis, while both 30-and 90-day mortality were associated with patient factors such as age, comorbidity, and hospital volume, only 90-day mortality was influenced by tumor-and management-related variables such as stage, tumor location, and receipt of neoadjuvant therapy. Hospital performance was examined as top 10%, middle 10% to 90%, and lowest 10% as ranked using risk-adjusted odds of mortality. There was moderate correlation between ranking based on 30-and 90-day mortality [weighted k = 0.45 (95% confidence interval, 0.39- 0.52)]. Compared with 30-day mortality rankings, nearly 20% of hospitals changed their ranking category when 90-day mortality rankings were used. Conclusions: Examination of 90-day mortality after esophagectomy reflects cancer patient management decisions and may provide actionable targets for quality improvement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)286-291
Number of pages6
JournalAnnals of Surgery
Volume263
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Esophagectomy
Quality Improvement
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Mortality
Neoplasms
Hospital Mortality
Logistic Models
Neoadjuvant Therapy
Esophageal Neoplasms
Comorbidity

Keywords

  • 90-day mortality
  • Esophageal cancer
  • Esophagectomy
  • Hospital performance
  • Quality improvement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

In, H., Palis, B. E., Merkow, R. P., Posner, M. C., Ferguson, M. K., Winchester, D. P., & Pezzi, C. M. (2016). Doubling of 30-day mortality by 90 days after esophagectomy: A critica l measure of outcomes for quality improvement. Annals of Surgery, 263(2), 286-291. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001215

Doubling of 30-day mortality by 90 days after esophagectomy : A critica l measure of outcomes for quality improvement. / In, Haejin; Palis, Bryan E.; Merkow, Ryan P.; Posner, Mitchell C.; Ferguson, Mark K.; Winchester, David P.; Pezzi, Christopher M.

In: Annals of Surgery, Vol. 263, No. 2, 2016, p. 286-291.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

In, Haejin ; Palis, Bryan E. ; Merkow, Ryan P. ; Posner, Mitchell C. ; Ferguson, Mark K. ; Winchester, David P. ; Pezzi, Christopher M. / Doubling of 30-day mortality by 90 days after esophagectomy : A critica l measure of outcomes for quality improvement. In: Annals of Surgery. 2016 ; Vol. 263, No. 2. pp. 286-291.
@article{5e8c36673f18481099aa4dcafd647dd0,
title = "Doubling of 30-day mortality by 90 days after esophagectomy: A critica l measure of outcomes for quality improvement",
abstract = "Objectives: Our objectives were to (1) compare 30-and 90-day mortality rates after esophagectomy, (2) compare drivers of 30-and 90-day mortality, and (3) examine whether 90-day mortality affects hospital rankings. Background: Operative mortality has traditionally been assessed at 30 days. Ninety-day mortality has been suggested as a more appropriate indicator of quality, particularly after complex cancer surgery. Methods: Esophagectomies for nonmetastatic esophageal cancer patients diagnosed between 2007 and 2011 were identified in the National Cancer Data Base. Mortality rates were examined by patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and hospital procedural volume. Risk-adjusted hierarchical logistic regression models examined hospital performance for mortality. Results: A total of 15,796 esophagectomy patients at 977 hospitals were available for analysis. Ninety-day overall mortality was more than double the 30-day mortality (8.9{\%} vs 4.2{\%}; P <0.0001). In multivariate analysis, while both 30-and 90-day mortality were associated with patient factors such as age, comorbidity, and hospital volume, only 90-day mortality was influenced by tumor-and management-related variables such as stage, tumor location, and receipt of neoadjuvant therapy. Hospital performance was examined as top 10{\%}, middle 10{\%} to 90{\%}, and lowest 10{\%} as ranked using risk-adjusted odds of mortality. There was moderate correlation between ranking based on 30-and 90-day mortality [weighted k = 0.45 (95{\%} confidence interval, 0.39- 0.52)]. Compared with 30-day mortality rankings, nearly 20{\%} of hospitals changed their ranking category when 90-day mortality rankings were used. Conclusions: Examination of 90-day mortality after esophagectomy reflects cancer patient management decisions and may provide actionable targets for quality improvement.",
keywords = "90-day mortality, Esophageal cancer, Esophagectomy, Hospital performance, Quality improvement",
author = "Haejin In and Palis, {Bryan E.} and Merkow, {Ryan P.} and Posner, {Mitchell C.} and Ferguson, {Mark K.} and Winchester, {David P.} and Pezzi, {Christopher M.}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1097/SLA.0000000000001215",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "263",
pages = "286--291",
journal = "Annals of Surgery",
issn = "0003-4932",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Doubling of 30-day mortality by 90 days after esophagectomy

T2 - A critica l measure of outcomes for quality improvement

AU - In, Haejin

AU - Palis, Bryan E.

AU - Merkow, Ryan P.

AU - Posner, Mitchell C.

AU - Ferguson, Mark K.

AU - Winchester, David P.

AU - Pezzi, Christopher M.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Objectives: Our objectives were to (1) compare 30-and 90-day mortality rates after esophagectomy, (2) compare drivers of 30-and 90-day mortality, and (3) examine whether 90-day mortality affects hospital rankings. Background: Operative mortality has traditionally been assessed at 30 days. Ninety-day mortality has been suggested as a more appropriate indicator of quality, particularly after complex cancer surgery. Methods: Esophagectomies for nonmetastatic esophageal cancer patients diagnosed between 2007 and 2011 were identified in the National Cancer Data Base. Mortality rates were examined by patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and hospital procedural volume. Risk-adjusted hierarchical logistic regression models examined hospital performance for mortality. Results: A total of 15,796 esophagectomy patients at 977 hospitals were available for analysis. Ninety-day overall mortality was more than double the 30-day mortality (8.9% vs 4.2%; P <0.0001). In multivariate analysis, while both 30-and 90-day mortality were associated with patient factors such as age, comorbidity, and hospital volume, only 90-day mortality was influenced by tumor-and management-related variables such as stage, tumor location, and receipt of neoadjuvant therapy. Hospital performance was examined as top 10%, middle 10% to 90%, and lowest 10% as ranked using risk-adjusted odds of mortality. There was moderate correlation between ranking based on 30-and 90-day mortality [weighted k = 0.45 (95% confidence interval, 0.39- 0.52)]. Compared with 30-day mortality rankings, nearly 20% of hospitals changed their ranking category when 90-day mortality rankings were used. Conclusions: Examination of 90-day mortality after esophagectomy reflects cancer patient management decisions and may provide actionable targets for quality improvement.

AB - Objectives: Our objectives were to (1) compare 30-and 90-day mortality rates after esophagectomy, (2) compare drivers of 30-and 90-day mortality, and (3) examine whether 90-day mortality affects hospital rankings. Background: Operative mortality has traditionally been assessed at 30 days. Ninety-day mortality has been suggested as a more appropriate indicator of quality, particularly after complex cancer surgery. Methods: Esophagectomies for nonmetastatic esophageal cancer patients diagnosed between 2007 and 2011 were identified in the National Cancer Data Base. Mortality rates were examined by patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and hospital procedural volume. Risk-adjusted hierarchical logistic regression models examined hospital performance for mortality. Results: A total of 15,796 esophagectomy patients at 977 hospitals were available for analysis. Ninety-day overall mortality was more than double the 30-day mortality (8.9% vs 4.2%; P <0.0001). In multivariate analysis, while both 30-and 90-day mortality were associated with patient factors such as age, comorbidity, and hospital volume, only 90-day mortality was influenced by tumor-and management-related variables such as stage, tumor location, and receipt of neoadjuvant therapy. Hospital performance was examined as top 10%, middle 10% to 90%, and lowest 10% as ranked using risk-adjusted odds of mortality. There was moderate correlation between ranking based on 30-and 90-day mortality [weighted k = 0.45 (95% confidence interval, 0.39- 0.52)]. Compared with 30-day mortality rankings, nearly 20% of hospitals changed their ranking category when 90-day mortality rankings were used. Conclusions: Examination of 90-day mortality after esophagectomy reflects cancer patient management decisions and may provide actionable targets for quality improvement.

KW - 90-day mortality

KW - Esophageal cancer

KW - Esophagectomy

KW - Hospital performance

KW - Quality improvement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955573203&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955573203&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001215

DO - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001215

M3 - Article

C2 - 25915912

AN - SCOPUS:84955573203

VL - 263

SP - 286

EP - 291

JO - Annals of Surgery

JF - Annals of Surgery

SN - 0003-4932

IS - 2

ER -