Do we need another risk score protocol when the good old-fashioned method works better?

J. David Burkhardt; Luigi Di Biase; Andrea Natale

doi:10.1111/jce.12012

Do we need another risk score protocol when the good old-fashioned method works better?

J. David Burkhardt, Luigi Di Biase, Andrea Natale

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	146-147
Number of pages	2
Journal	Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
Volume	24
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.12012
State	Published - Feb 2013
Externally published	Yes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Physiology (medical)

Access to Document

10.1111/jce.12012

Cite this

@article{be08cdbde4df4611b1bb50e38b65de16,

title = "Do we need another risk score protocol when the good old-fashioned method works better?",

author = "Burkhardt, {J. David} and Biase, {Luigi Di} and Andrea Natale",

year = "2013",

month = feb,

doi = "10.1111/jce.12012",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "24",

pages = "146--147",

journal = "Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology",

issn = "1045-3873",