Do additional shaved margins at the time of lumpectomy eliminate the need for re-excision?

Allyson F. Jacobson, Juhi Asad, Susan K. Boolbol, Michael P. Osborne, Kwadwo Boachie-Adjei, Sheldon M. Feldman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Most women diagnosed with breast cancer undergo breast-conservation surgery. Re-excision rates for positive margins have been reported to be greater than 50%. The purpose of our study was to determine if removing additional shaved margins from the lumpectomy cavity at the time of lumpectomy reduces re-excisions. Methods: A retrospective study was performed on 125 women who had undergone lumpectomy with additional shaved margins taken from the lumpectomy cavity. Pathology reports were reviewed for tumor size and histology, lumpectomy and additional margin status, and specimen and margin volume. Results: If additional margins were not taken, 66% would have required re-excision. Because of taking additional shaved margins, re-excision was eliminated in 48%. Conclusion: Excising additional shaved margins at the original surgery reduced reoperations by 48%. There is a balance between removing additional margins and desirable cosmesis after breast-conservation surgery. The decision to take extra margins should be based on the surgeon's judgment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)556-558
Number of pages3
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume196
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Segmental Mastectomy
Breast Neoplasms
Reoperation
Histology
Breast
Retrospective Studies
Pathology
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • Breast conservation
  • Lumpectomy
  • Re-excision
  • Shaved margins

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Do additional shaved margins at the time of lumpectomy eliminate the need for re-excision? / Jacobson, Allyson F.; Asad, Juhi; Boolbol, Susan K.; Osborne, Michael P.; Boachie-Adjei, Kwadwo; Feldman, Sheldon M.

In: American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 196, No. 4, 01.10.2008, p. 556-558.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jacobson, Allyson F. ; Asad, Juhi ; Boolbol, Susan K. ; Osborne, Michael P. ; Boachie-Adjei, Kwadwo ; Feldman, Sheldon M. / Do additional shaved margins at the time of lumpectomy eliminate the need for re-excision?. In: American Journal of Surgery. 2008 ; Vol. 196, No. 4. pp. 556-558.
@article{41bd15257d224b568669cfb93a576fd2,
title = "Do additional shaved margins at the time of lumpectomy eliminate the need for re-excision?",
abstract = "Background: Most women diagnosed with breast cancer undergo breast-conservation surgery. Re-excision rates for positive margins have been reported to be greater than 50{\%}. The purpose of our study was to determine if removing additional shaved margins from the lumpectomy cavity at the time of lumpectomy reduces re-excisions. Methods: A retrospective study was performed on 125 women who had undergone lumpectomy with additional shaved margins taken from the lumpectomy cavity. Pathology reports were reviewed for tumor size and histology, lumpectomy and additional margin status, and specimen and margin volume. Results: If additional margins were not taken, 66{\%} would have required re-excision. Because of taking additional shaved margins, re-excision was eliminated in 48{\%}. Conclusion: Excising additional shaved margins at the original surgery reduced reoperations by 48{\%}. There is a balance between removing additional margins and desirable cosmesis after breast-conservation surgery. The decision to take extra margins should be based on the surgeon's judgment.",
keywords = "Breast cancer, Breast conservation, Lumpectomy, Re-excision, Shaved margins",
author = "Jacobson, {Allyson F.} and Juhi Asad and Boolbol, {Susan K.} and Osborne, {Michael P.} and Kwadwo Boachie-Adjei and Feldman, {Sheldon M.}",
year = "2008",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.06.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "196",
pages = "556--558",
journal = "American Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0002-9610",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do additional shaved margins at the time of lumpectomy eliminate the need for re-excision?

AU - Jacobson, Allyson F.

AU - Asad, Juhi

AU - Boolbol, Susan K.

AU - Osborne, Michael P.

AU - Boachie-Adjei, Kwadwo

AU - Feldman, Sheldon M.

PY - 2008/10/1

Y1 - 2008/10/1

N2 - Background: Most women diagnosed with breast cancer undergo breast-conservation surgery. Re-excision rates for positive margins have been reported to be greater than 50%. The purpose of our study was to determine if removing additional shaved margins from the lumpectomy cavity at the time of lumpectomy reduces re-excisions. Methods: A retrospective study was performed on 125 women who had undergone lumpectomy with additional shaved margins taken from the lumpectomy cavity. Pathology reports were reviewed for tumor size and histology, lumpectomy and additional margin status, and specimen and margin volume. Results: If additional margins were not taken, 66% would have required re-excision. Because of taking additional shaved margins, re-excision was eliminated in 48%. Conclusion: Excising additional shaved margins at the original surgery reduced reoperations by 48%. There is a balance between removing additional margins and desirable cosmesis after breast-conservation surgery. The decision to take extra margins should be based on the surgeon's judgment.

AB - Background: Most women diagnosed with breast cancer undergo breast-conservation surgery. Re-excision rates for positive margins have been reported to be greater than 50%. The purpose of our study was to determine if removing additional shaved margins from the lumpectomy cavity at the time of lumpectomy reduces re-excisions. Methods: A retrospective study was performed on 125 women who had undergone lumpectomy with additional shaved margins taken from the lumpectomy cavity. Pathology reports were reviewed for tumor size and histology, lumpectomy and additional margin status, and specimen and margin volume. Results: If additional margins were not taken, 66% would have required re-excision. Because of taking additional shaved margins, re-excision was eliminated in 48%. Conclusion: Excising additional shaved margins at the original surgery reduced reoperations by 48%. There is a balance between removing additional margins and desirable cosmesis after breast-conservation surgery. The decision to take extra margins should be based on the surgeon's judgment.

KW - Breast cancer

KW - Breast conservation

KW - Lumpectomy

KW - Re-excision

KW - Shaved margins

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=52049123315&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=52049123315&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.06.007

DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.06.007

M3 - Article

VL - 196

SP - 556

EP - 558

JO - American Journal of Surgery

JF - American Journal of Surgery

SN - 0002-9610

IS - 4

ER -