Distinguishing appraisal and personality influences on quality of life in chronic illness: introducing the quality-of-life Appraisal Profile version 2

Bruce D. Rapkin, Iliana Garcia, Wesley Michael, Jie Zhang, Carolyn E. Schwartz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Cognitive appraisal of quality of life (QOL) differs across individuals in ways that explain otherwise paradoxical findings, such as similar QOL ratings among individuals in highly divergent health states. Although warranted by a growing body of evidence, routine assessment of appraisal in QOL research has been impeded by measurement challenges. This study describes the QOL Appraisal Profile-version 2 (QOLAPv2), a new measure that addresses these challenges. Methods: A heterogeneous, on-line cohort of chronic disease patients and caregivers completed the QOLAPv2, along with demographics, PROMIS10 and Brief NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI). Analyses address the psychometric properties and construct validity of this new measure using principal components, bivariate, canonical correlation, and linear regression analyses. Results: Analysis including 4173 respondents yielded 12 second-order QOLAPv2 principal components. Appraisal components varied with age and disease duration. Appraisals involving “Wellness,” “Health,” and “Recent Challenges” were correlated with QOL and with NEO-PI scales of “Agreeableness” and “Conscientiousness.” Canonical correlation analysis revealed that QOL scales were associated with appraisals involving “Spirituality,” “Anticipating Decline,” and “Lightness of Being.” Appraisal dimensions of “Relationships,” “Maintaining Roles,” “Independence,” “Pursuing Dreams,” and “Lightness of Being” were also associated with personality scales. Appraisal measures accounted for significantly more variance in QOL than personality and demographics alone. Conclusions: Findings corroborate the Rapkin and Schwartz QOL appraisal theory. QOL appraisal measures correlate as expected with personality scales, and explain more variance in QOL than does personality. The QOLAPv2 can be used across populations to provide insight into patients’ concerns, salient experiences, and comparators.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-15
Number of pages15
JournalQuality of Life Research
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jun 7 2017

Fingerprint

Personality
Chronic Disease
Quality of Life
Personality Inventory
Demography
Spirituality
Health
Psychometrics
Caregivers
Linear Models
Regression Analysis
Research
Population

Keywords

  • Appraisal
  • Chronic disease
  • Cognitive processes
  • Patient-reported outcomes
  • Personality
  • Quality of life
  • Rare disease
  • Response shift

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Distinguishing appraisal and personality influences on quality of life in chronic illness : introducing the quality-of-life Appraisal Profile version 2. / Rapkin, Bruce D.; Garcia, Iliana; Michael, Wesley; Zhang, Jie; Schwartz, Carolyn E.

In: Quality of Life Research, 07.06.2017, p. 1-15.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{69a10ed772a547b1913e2b44bbf179a8,
title = "Distinguishing appraisal and personality influences on quality of life in chronic illness: introducing the quality-of-life Appraisal Profile version 2",
abstract = "Background: Cognitive appraisal of quality of life (QOL) differs across individuals in ways that explain otherwise paradoxical findings, such as similar QOL ratings among individuals in highly divergent health states. Although warranted by a growing body of evidence, routine assessment of appraisal in QOL research has been impeded by measurement challenges. This study describes the QOL Appraisal Profile-version 2 (QOLAPv2), a new measure that addresses these challenges. Methods: A heterogeneous, on-line cohort of chronic disease patients and caregivers completed the QOLAPv2, along with demographics, PROMIS10 and Brief NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI). Analyses address the psychometric properties and construct validity of this new measure using principal components, bivariate, canonical correlation, and linear regression analyses. Results: Analysis including 4173 respondents yielded 12 second-order QOLAPv2 principal components. Appraisal components varied with age and disease duration. Appraisals involving “Wellness,” “Health,” and “Recent Challenges” were correlated with QOL and with NEO-PI scales of “Agreeableness” and “Conscientiousness.” Canonical correlation analysis revealed that QOL scales were associated with appraisals involving “Spirituality,” “Anticipating Decline,” and “Lightness of Being.” Appraisal dimensions of “Relationships,” “Maintaining Roles,” “Independence,” “Pursuing Dreams,” and “Lightness of Being” were also associated with personality scales. Appraisal measures accounted for significantly more variance in QOL than personality and demographics alone. Conclusions: Findings corroborate the Rapkin and Schwartz QOL appraisal theory. QOL appraisal measures correlate as expected with personality scales, and explain more variance in QOL than does personality. The QOLAPv2 can be used across populations to provide insight into patients’ concerns, salient experiences, and comparators.",
keywords = "Appraisal, Chronic disease, Cognitive processes, Patient-reported outcomes, Personality, Quality of life, Rare disease, Response shift",
author = "Rapkin, {Bruce D.} and Iliana Garcia and Wesley Michael and Jie Zhang and Schwartz, {Carolyn E.}",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1007/s11136-017-1600-y",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--15",
journal = "Quality of Life Research",
issn = "0962-9343",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Distinguishing appraisal and personality influences on quality of life in chronic illness

T2 - introducing the quality-of-life Appraisal Profile version 2

AU - Rapkin, Bruce D.

AU - Garcia, Iliana

AU - Michael, Wesley

AU - Zhang, Jie

AU - Schwartz, Carolyn E.

PY - 2017/6/7

Y1 - 2017/6/7

N2 - Background: Cognitive appraisal of quality of life (QOL) differs across individuals in ways that explain otherwise paradoxical findings, such as similar QOL ratings among individuals in highly divergent health states. Although warranted by a growing body of evidence, routine assessment of appraisal in QOL research has been impeded by measurement challenges. This study describes the QOL Appraisal Profile-version 2 (QOLAPv2), a new measure that addresses these challenges. Methods: A heterogeneous, on-line cohort of chronic disease patients and caregivers completed the QOLAPv2, along with demographics, PROMIS10 and Brief NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI). Analyses address the psychometric properties and construct validity of this new measure using principal components, bivariate, canonical correlation, and linear regression analyses. Results: Analysis including 4173 respondents yielded 12 second-order QOLAPv2 principal components. Appraisal components varied with age and disease duration. Appraisals involving “Wellness,” “Health,” and “Recent Challenges” were correlated with QOL and with NEO-PI scales of “Agreeableness” and “Conscientiousness.” Canonical correlation analysis revealed that QOL scales were associated with appraisals involving “Spirituality,” “Anticipating Decline,” and “Lightness of Being.” Appraisal dimensions of “Relationships,” “Maintaining Roles,” “Independence,” “Pursuing Dreams,” and “Lightness of Being” were also associated with personality scales. Appraisal measures accounted for significantly more variance in QOL than personality and demographics alone. Conclusions: Findings corroborate the Rapkin and Schwartz QOL appraisal theory. QOL appraisal measures correlate as expected with personality scales, and explain more variance in QOL than does personality. The QOLAPv2 can be used across populations to provide insight into patients’ concerns, salient experiences, and comparators.

AB - Background: Cognitive appraisal of quality of life (QOL) differs across individuals in ways that explain otherwise paradoxical findings, such as similar QOL ratings among individuals in highly divergent health states. Although warranted by a growing body of evidence, routine assessment of appraisal in QOL research has been impeded by measurement challenges. This study describes the QOL Appraisal Profile-version 2 (QOLAPv2), a new measure that addresses these challenges. Methods: A heterogeneous, on-line cohort of chronic disease patients and caregivers completed the QOLAPv2, along with demographics, PROMIS10 and Brief NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI). Analyses address the psychometric properties and construct validity of this new measure using principal components, bivariate, canonical correlation, and linear regression analyses. Results: Analysis including 4173 respondents yielded 12 second-order QOLAPv2 principal components. Appraisal components varied with age and disease duration. Appraisals involving “Wellness,” “Health,” and “Recent Challenges” were correlated with QOL and with NEO-PI scales of “Agreeableness” and “Conscientiousness.” Canonical correlation analysis revealed that QOL scales were associated with appraisals involving “Spirituality,” “Anticipating Decline,” and “Lightness of Being.” Appraisal dimensions of “Relationships,” “Maintaining Roles,” “Independence,” “Pursuing Dreams,” and “Lightness of Being” were also associated with personality scales. Appraisal measures accounted for significantly more variance in QOL than personality and demographics alone. Conclusions: Findings corroborate the Rapkin and Schwartz QOL appraisal theory. QOL appraisal measures correlate as expected with personality scales, and explain more variance in QOL than does personality. The QOLAPv2 can be used across populations to provide insight into patients’ concerns, salient experiences, and comparators.

KW - Appraisal

KW - Chronic disease

KW - Cognitive processes

KW - Patient-reported outcomes

KW - Personality

KW - Quality of life

KW - Rare disease

KW - Response shift

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020237972&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85020237972&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11136-017-1600-y

DO - 10.1007/s11136-017-1600-y

M3 - Article

C2 - 28593531

AN - SCOPUS:85020237972

SP - 1

EP - 15

JO - Quality of Life Research

JF - Quality of Life Research

SN - 0962-9343

ER -