Dissociation and posttraumatic stress 1 year after the World Trade Center disaster

Follow-up of a longitudinal survey

Daphne Simeon, Jennifer Greenberg, Dorothy Nelson, James Schmeidler, Eric Hollander

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: We conducted a 1-year follow-up of an original mail survey of early reactions to the World Trade Center disaster. Method: Of the 75 subjects originally surveyed, 58 (77%) responded. The survey included measures of dissociation (Dissociative Experiences Scale, Cambridge Depersonalization Scale, Clinician-Administered Dissociative States Scale), posttraumatic stress (Impact of Event Scale-Revised), social support (Interpersonal Support Evaluation List-short form), and a life quality measure (Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-short form). We hypothesized that dissociative versus posttraumatic symptoms at follow-up could be dissected on the basis of early reactions. Results: Responders and nonresponders did not differ in baseline characteristics. Exposure was not associated with dissociation or posttraumatic stress at follow-up. Of distress, dissociation, and posttraumatic stress at baseline, baseline dissociation was the strongest predictor of outcome dissociation while baseline posttraumatic stress was the strongest predictor of outcome posttraumatic stress. Of 4 peritraumatic distress factors generated in the original survey, "loss of control" and "guilt/shame" were significantly related to dissociation and posttraumatic stress at outcome, while "helplessness/anger" was only associated with posttraumatic stress at outcome. Lesser improvement in posttraumatic stress over the first year was significantly related to less social support and greater comorbid dissociation. Interim social support was associated with better life quality and fewer symptoms at outcome. Conclusion: There was evidence for partly independent pathways toward dissociation versus posttraumatic stress 1 year after the disaster. Feelings of guilt and shame, and persistent dissociation, were poor prognostic factors, while social support had a powerful ameliorating influence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)231-237
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Clinical Psychiatry
Volume66
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dissociative Disorders
Disasters
Longitudinal Studies
Social Support
Shame
Guilt
Quality of Life
Depersonalization
Anger
Postal Service
Emotions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Dissociation and posttraumatic stress 1 year after the World Trade Center disaster : Follow-up of a longitudinal survey. / Simeon, Daphne; Greenberg, Jennifer; Nelson, Dorothy; Schmeidler, James; Hollander, Eric.

In: Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, Vol. 66, No. 2, 2005, p. 231-237.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Simeon, Daphne ; Greenberg, Jennifer ; Nelson, Dorothy ; Schmeidler, James ; Hollander, Eric. / Dissociation and posttraumatic stress 1 year after the World Trade Center disaster : Follow-up of a longitudinal survey. In: Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2005 ; Vol. 66, No. 2. pp. 231-237.
@article{6eaa5985fdd9430083f9dddfa59651e6,
title = "Dissociation and posttraumatic stress 1 year after the World Trade Center disaster: Follow-up of a longitudinal survey",
abstract = "Background: We conducted a 1-year follow-up of an original mail survey of early reactions to the World Trade Center disaster. Method: Of the 75 subjects originally surveyed, 58 (77{\%}) responded. The survey included measures of dissociation (Dissociative Experiences Scale, Cambridge Depersonalization Scale, Clinician-Administered Dissociative States Scale), posttraumatic stress (Impact of Event Scale-Revised), social support (Interpersonal Support Evaluation List-short form), and a life quality measure (Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-short form). We hypothesized that dissociative versus posttraumatic symptoms at follow-up could be dissected on the basis of early reactions. Results: Responders and nonresponders did not differ in baseline characteristics. Exposure was not associated with dissociation or posttraumatic stress at follow-up. Of distress, dissociation, and posttraumatic stress at baseline, baseline dissociation was the strongest predictor of outcome dissociation while baseline posttraumatic stress was the strongest predictor of outcome posttraumatic stress. Of 4 peritraumatic distress factors generated in the original survey, {"}loss of control{"} and {"}guilt/shame{"} were significantly related to dissociation and posttraumatic stress at outcome, while {"}helplessness/anger{"} was only associated with posttraumatic stress at outcome. Lesser improvement in posttraumatic stress over the first year was significantly related to less social support and greater comorbid dissociation. Interim social support was associated with better life quality and fewer symptoms at outcome. Conclusion: There was evidence for partly independent pathways toward dissociation versus posttraumatic stress 1 year after the disaster. Feelings of guilt and shame, and persistent dissociation, were poor prognostic factors, while social support had a powerful ameliorating influence.",
author = "Daphne Simeon and Jennifer Greenberg and Dorothy Nelson and James Schmeidler and Eric Hollander",
year = "2005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "66",
pages = "231--237",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Psychiatry",
issn = "0160-6689",
publisher = "Physicians Postgraduate Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dissociation and posttraumatic stress 1 year after the World Trade Center disaster

T2 - Follow-up of a longitudinal survey

AU - Simeon, Daphne

AU - Greenberg, Jennifer

AU - Nelson, Dorothy

AU - Schmeidler, James

AU - Hollander, Eric

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Background: We conducted a 1-year follow-up of an original mail survey of early reactions to the World Trade Center disaster. Method: Of the 75 subjects originally surveyed, 58 (77%) responded. The survey included measures of dissociation (Dissociative Experiences Scale, Cambridge Depersonalization Scale, Clinician-Administered Dissociative States Scale), posttraumatic stress (Impact of Event Scale-Revised), social support (Interpersonal Support Evaluation List-short form), and a life quality measure (Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-short form). We hypothesized that dissociative versus posttraumatic symptoms at follow-up could be dissected on the basis of early reactions. Results: Responders and nonresponders did not differ in baseline characteristics. Exposure was not associated with dissociation or posttraumatic stress at follow-up. Of distress, dissociation, and posttraumatic stress at baseline, baseline dissociation was the strongest predictor of outcome dissociation while baseline posttraumatic stress was the strongest predictor of outcome posttraumatic stress. Of 4 peritraumatic distress factors generated in the original survey, "loss of control" and "guilt/shame" were significantly related to dissociation and posttraumatic stress at outcome, while "helplessness/anger" was only associated with posttraumatic stress at outcome. Lesser improvement in posttraumatic stress over the first year was significantly related to less social support and greater comorbid dissociation. Interim social support was associated with better life quality and fewer symptoms at outcome. Conclusion: There was evidence for partly independent pathways toward dissociation versus posttraumatic stress 1 year after the disaster. Feelings of guilt and shame, and persistent dissociation, were poor prognostic factors, while social support had a powerful ameliorating influence.

AB - Background: We conducted a 1-year follow-up of an original mail survey of early reactions to the World Trade Center disaster. Method: Of the 75 subjects originally surveyed, 58 (77%) responded. The survey included measures of dissociation (Dissociative Experiences Scale, Cambridge Depersonalization Scale, Clinician-Administered Dissociative States Scale), posttraumatic stress (Impact of Event Scale-Revised), social support (Interpersonal Support Evaluation List-short form), and a life quality measure (Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-short form). We hypothesized that dissociative versus posttraumatic symptoms at follow-up could be dissected on the basis of early reactions. Results: Responders and nonresponders did not differ in baseline characteristics. Exposure was not associated with dissociation or posttraumatic stress at follow-up. Of distress, dissociation, and posttraumatic stress at baseline, baseline dissociation was the strongest predictor of outcome dissociation while baseline posttraumatic stress was the strongest predictor of outcome posttraumatic stress. Of 4 peritraumatic distress factors generated in the original survey, "loss of control" and "guilt/shame" were significantly related to dissociation and posttraumatic stress at outcome, while "helplessness/anger" was only associated with posttraumatic stress at outcome. Lesser improvement in posttraumatic stress over the first year was significantly related to less social support and greater comorbid dissociation. Interim social support was associated with better life quality and fewer symptoms at outcome. Conclusion: There was evidence for partly independent pathways toward dissociation versus posttraumatic stress 1 year after the disaster. Feelings of guilt and shame, and persistent dissociation, were poor prognostic factors, while social support had a powerful ameliorating influence.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=14644420161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=14644420161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 66

SP - 231

EP - 237

JO - Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

JF - Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

SN - 0160-6689

IS - 2

ER -