Discharge Destination After Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty

An Analysis of Postdischarge Outcomes and Placement Risk Factors

Aakash Keswani, Mitchell C. Weiser, John Shin, Andrew J. Lovy, Calin S. Moucha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Given the rising incidence of revision total joint arthroplasty (RJR), bundled payments will likely be applied to RJR in the near future. This study aimed to compare postdischarge adverse events by discharge destination, identify risk factors for discharge placement, and stratify RJR patients based on these risk factors to identify the most appropriate discharge destination. Methods Patients that underwent revision total hip or knee arthroplasty from 2011 to 2013 were identified in the American College of Surgeon's National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Analysis of risk factors was assessed using preoperative and intraoperative variables. Results A total of 9973 RJR patients from 2011 to 2013 were included for analysis. The most common discharge destination included home (66%), skilled nursing facility (SNF; 23%), and inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF; 11%). Bivariate analysis revealed higher rate of postdischarge 30-day severe adverse events (6.1% vs 4.1%, P <.001) and unplanned readmissions (9.3% vs 6.1%, P <.001) in nonhome vs home patients. In multivariate analysis, SNF and IRF patients were 1.30 and 1.51 times more likely to suffer an unplanned 30-day readmission relative to home patients (P ≤.01), respectively. After stratifying patients by number of significant risk factors and discharge destination, IRF patients consistently had significantly higher rates of unplanned 30-day readmission than home patients (P ≤.05). Conclusion RJR patients who are discharged to SNF or IRF have significantly increased risk for unplanned readmissions as compared with patients discharged home. Across risk levels, home discharge destination (when feasible) is the optimal strategy compared with IRF, although the distinction between SNF and home is less clear.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1866-1872.e1
JournalJournal of Arthroplasty
Volume31
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Reoperation
Arthroplasty
Skilled Nursing Facilities
Patient Readmission
Knee Replacement Arthroplasties
Quality Improvement
Hip
Inpatients
Rehabilitation
Multivariate Analysis
Databases
Incidence

Keywords

  • discharge destination
  • discharge disposition
  • inpatient rehab
  • readmission
  • revision joint arthroplasty
  • skilled nursing facility

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Discharge Destination After Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty : An Analysis of Postdischarge Outcomes and Placement Risk Factors. / Keswani, Aakash; Weiser, Mitchell C.; Shin, John; Lovy, Andrew J.; Moucha, Calin S.

In: Journal of Arthroplasty, Vol. 31, No. 9, 01.09.2016, p. 1866-1872.e1.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Keswani, Aakash ; Weiser, Mitchell C. ; Shin, John ; Lovy, Andrew J. ; Moucha, Calin S. / Discharge Destination After Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty : An Analysis of Postdischarge Outcomes and Placement Risk Factors. In: Journal of Arthroplasty. 2016 ; Vol. 31, No. 9. pp. 1866-1872.e1.
@article{53b55620ecf74b4b906c07030110fdca,
title = "Discharge Destination After Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty: An Analysis of Postdischarge Outcomes and Placement Risk Factors",
abstract = "Background Given the rising incidence of revision total joint arthroplasty (RJR), bundled payments will likely be applied to RJR in the near future. This study aimed to compare postdischarge adverse events by discharge destination, identify risk factors for discharge placement, and stratify RJR patients based on these risk factors to identify the most appropriate discharge destination. Methods Patients that underwent revision total hip or knee arthroplasty from 2011 to 2013 were identified in the American College of Surgeon's National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Analysis of risk factors was assessed using preoperative and intraoperative variables. Results A total of 9973 RJR patients from 2011 to 2013 were included for analysis. The most common discharge destination included home (66{\%}), skilled nursing facility (SNF; 23{\%}), and inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF; 11{\%}). Bivariate analysis revealed higher rate of postdischarge 30-day severe adverse events (6.1{\%} vs 4.1{\%}, P <.001) and unplanned readmissions (9.3{\%} vs 6.1{\%}, P <.001) in nonhome vs home patients. In multivariate analysis, SNF and IRF patients were 1.30 and 1.51 times more likely to suffer an unplanned 30-day readmission relative to home patients (P ≤.01), respectively. After stratifying patients by number of significant risk factors and discharge destination, IRF patients consistently had significantly higher rates of unplanned 30-day readmission than home patients (P ≤.05). Conclusion RJR patients who are discharged to SNF or IRF have significantly increased risk for unplanned readmissions as compared with patients discharged home. Across risk levels, home discharge destination (when feasible) is the optimal strategy compared with IRF, although the distinction between SNF and home is less clear.",
keywords = "discharge destination, discharge disposition, inpatient rehab, readmission, revision joint arthroplasty, skilled nursing facility",
author = "Aakash Keswani and Weiser, {Mitchell C.} and John Shin and Lovy, {Andrew J.} and Moucha, {Calin S.}",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.arth.2016.02.053",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "1866--1872.e1",
journal = "Journal of Arthroplasty",
issn = "0883-5403",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Discharge Destination After Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty

T2 - An Analysis of Postdischarge Outcomes and Placement Risk Factors

AU - Keswani, Aakash

AU - Weiser, Mitchell C.

AU - Shin, John

AU - Lovy, Andrew J.

AU - Moucha, Calin S.

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - Background Given the rising incidence of revision total joint arthroplasty (RJR), bundled payments will likely be applied to RJR in the near future. This study aimed to compare postdischarge adverse events by discharge destination, identify risk factors for discharge placement, and stratify RJR patients based on these risk factors to identify the most appropriate discharge destination. Methods Patients that underwent revision total hip or knee arthroplasty from 2011 to 2013 were identified in the American College of Surgeon's National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Analysis of risk factors was assessed using preoperative and intraoperative variables. Results A total of 9973 RJR patients from 2011 to 2013 were included for analysis. The most common discharge destination included home (66%), skilled nursing facility (SNF; 23%), and inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF; 11%). Bivariate analysis revealed higher rate of postdischarge 30-day severe adverse events (6.1% vs 4.1%, P <.001) and unplanned readmissions (9.3% vs 6.1%, P <.001) in nonhome vs home patients. In multivariate analysis, SNF and IRF patients were 1.30 and 1.51 times more likely to suffer an unplanned 30-day readmission relative to home patients (P ≤.01), respectively. After stratifying patients by number of significant risk factors and discharge destination, IRF patients consistently had significantly higher rates of unplanned 30-day readmission than home patients (P ≤.05). Conclusion RJR patients who are discharged to SNF or IRF have significantly increased risk for unplanned readmissions as compared with patients discharged home. Across risk levels, home discharge destination (when feasible) is the optimal strategy compared with IRF, although the distinction between SNF and home is less clear.

AB - Background Given the rising incidence of revision total joint arthroplasty (RJR), bundled payments will likely be applied to RJR in the near future. This study aimed to compare postdischarge adverse events by discharge destination, identify risk factors for discharge placement, and stratify RJR patients based on these risk factors to identify the most appropriate discharge destination. Methods Patients that underwent revision total hip or knee arthroplasty from 2011 to 2013 were identified in the American College of Surgeon's National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Analysis of risk factors was assessed using preoperative and intraoperative variables. Results A total of 9973 RJR patients from 2011 to 2013 were included for analysis. The most common discharge destination included home (66%), skilled nursing facility (SNF; 23%), and inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF; 11%). Bivariate analysis revealed higher rate of postdischarge 30-day severe adverse events (6.1% vs 4.1%, P <.001) and unplanned readmissions (9.3% vs 6.1%, P <.001) in nonhome vs home patients. In multivariate analysis, SNF and IRF patients were 1.30 and 1.51 times more likely to suffer an unplanned 30-day readmission relative to home patients (P ≤.01), respectively. After stratifying patients by number of significant risk factors and discharge destination, IRF patients consistently had significantly higher rates of unplanned 30-day readmission than home patients (P ≤.05). Conclusion RJR patients who are discharged to SNF or IRF have significantly increased risk for unplanned readmissions as compared with patients discharged home. Across risk levels, home discharge destination (when feasible) is the optimal strategy compared with IRF, although the distinction between SNF and home is less clear.

KW - discharge destination

KW - discharge disposition

KW - inpatient rehab

KW - readmission

KW - revision joint arthroplasty

KW - skilled nursing facility

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84965172114&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84965172114&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.arth.2016.02.053

DO - 10.1016/j.arth.2016.02.053

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 1866-1872.e1

JO - Journal of Arthroplasty

JF - Journal of Arthroplasty

SN - 0883-5403

IS - 9

ER -