TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of an algorithm for phenotypic screening of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in the routine laboratory
AU - on behalf of ONERBA's Carbapenem Resistance Study Group
AU - Robert, Jérôme
AU - Pantel, Alix
AU - Merens, Audrey
AU - Meiller, Elodie
AU - Lavigne, Jean Philippe
AU - Nicolas-Chanoine, Marie Hélène
AU - Brieu, N.
AU - Vrain, A.
AU - Scanvic, A.
AU - Porcheret, H.
AU - Garnier, P.
AU - Bertrand, X.
AU - Descamps, D.
AU - Hombrouck, C.
AU - Soullié, B.
AU - Heym, B.
AU - Paul, J. G.
AU - de Montclos, H.
AU - Garrec, H.
AU - Levast, M.
AU - Mendes-Martins, L.
AU - Langeard, M.
AU - Decousser, J. W.
AU - Huet, C.
AU - Bert, F.
AU - Herzig, V.
AU - Klein, J. P.
AU - Nebbad, B.
AU - Hendricx, S.
AU - Verhaeghe, A.
AU - Lafaurie, C.
AU - Lanselle, C.
AU - Elsayed, F.
AU - Carrer, A.
AU - Drieux-Rouzet, L.
AU - Evreux, F.
AU - Varache, C.
AU - Wallet, F.
AU - Martin, C.
AU - Le-Bris, J. M.
AU - Moulhade, M. C.
AU - Deville, E.
AU - Menouni, O.
AU - Jean-Pierre, H.
AU - Mion, P.
AU - Pierrot, P.
AU - Delarbre, J. M.
AU - Coude, B.
AU - Foca, M.
AU - Degand, N.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the French Society for Microbiology (SFM, www.sfm-microbiologie.org).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Author(s).
PY - 2017/1/17
Y1 - 2017/1/17
N2 - Background: Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) are difficult to identify among carbapenem non-susceptible Enterobacteriaceae (NSE). We designed phenotypic strategies giving priority to high sensitivity for screening putative CPE before further testing. Methods: Presence of carbapenemase-encoding genes in ertapenem NSE (MIC > 0.5 mg/l) consecutively isolated in 80 French laboratories between November 2011 and April 2012 was determined by the Check-MDR-CT103 array method. Using the Mueller-Hinton (MH) disk diffusion method, clinical diameter breakpoints of carbapenems other than ertapenem, piperazicillin+tazobactam, ticarcillin+clavulanate and cefepime as well as diameter cut-offs for these antibiotics and temocillin were evaluated alone or combined to determine their performances (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios) for identifying putative CPE among these ertapenem-NSE isolates. To increase the screening specificity, these antibiotics were also tested on cloxacillin-containing MH when carbapenem NSE isolates belonged to species producing chromosomal cephalosporinase (AmpC) but Escherichia coli. Results: Out of the 349 ertapenem NSE, 52 (14.9%) were CPE, including 39 producing OXA-48 group carbapenemase, eight KPC and five MBL. A screening strategy based on the following diameter cut offs, ticarcillin+clavulanate <15 mm, temocillin <15 mm, meropenem or imipenem <22 mm, and cefepime <26 mm, showed 100% sensitivity and 68.1% specificity with the better likelihood ratios combination. The specificity increased when a diameter cut-off <32 mm for imipenem (76.1%) or meropenem (78.8%) further tested on cloxacillin-containing MH was added to the previous strategy for AmpC-producing isolates. Conclusion: The proposed strategies that allowed for increasing the likelihood of CPE among ertapenem-NSE isolates should be considered as a surrogate for carbapenemase production before further CPE confirmatory testing.
AB - Background: Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) are difficult to identify among carbapenem non-susceptible Enterobacteriaceae (NSE). We designed phenotypic strategies giving priority to high sensitivity for screening putative CPE before further testing. Methods: Presence of carbapenemase-encoding genes in ertapenem NSE (MIC > 0.5 mg/l) consecutively isolated in 80 French laboratories between November 2011 and April 2012 was determined by the Check-MDR-CT103 array method. Using the Mueller-Hinton (MH) disk diffusion method, clinical diameter breakpoints of carbapenems other than ertapenem, piperazicillin+tazobactam, ticarcillin+clavulanate and cefepime as well as diameter cut-offs for these antibiotics and temocillin were evaluated alone or combined to determine their performances (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios) for identifying putative CPE among these ertapenem-NSE isolates. To increase the screening specificity, these antibiotics were also tested on cloxacillin-containing MH when carbapenem NSE isolates belonged to species producing chromosomal cephalosporinase (AmpC) but Escherichia coli. Results: Out of the 349 ertapenem NSE, 52 (14.9%) were CPE, including 39 producing OXA-48 group carbapenemase, eight KPC and five MBL. A screening strategy based on the following diameter cut offs, ticarcillin+clavulanate <15 mm, temocillin <15 mm, meropenem or imipenem <22 mm, and cefepime <26 mm, showed 100% sensitivity and 68.1% specificity with the better likelihood ratios combination. The specificity increased when a diameter cut-off <32 mm for imipenem (76.1%) or meropenem (78.8%) further tested on cloxacillin-containing MH was added to the previous strategy for AmpC-producing isolates. Conclusion: The proposed strategies that allowed for increasing the likelihood of CPE among ertapenem-NSE isolates should be considered as a surrogate for carbapenemase production before further CPE confirmatory testing.
KW - Algorithm
KW - Carbapenemase
KW - Disk diffusion method
KW - Enterobacteriaceae
KW - Screening
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011343406&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011343406&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12879-016-2174-y
DO - 10.1186/s12879-016-2174-y
M3 - Article
C2 - 28095794
AN - SCOPUS:85011343406
SN - 1471-2334
VL - 17
JO - BMC Infectious Diseases
JF - BMC Infectious Diseases
IS - 1
M1 - 78
ER -