Developing Common Metrics for the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSAs)

Lessons Learned

Doris M. Rubio, Arthur E. Blank, Ann Dozier, Lisle Hites, Victoria A. Gilliam, Joe Hunt, Julie Rainwater, William M. Trochim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Roadmap for Medical Research initiative, funded by the NIH Common Fund and offered through the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) program, developed more than 60 unique models for achieving the NIH goal of accelerating discoveries toward better public health. The variety of these models enabled participating academic centers to experiment with different approaches to fit their research environment. A central challenge related to the diversity of approaches is the ability to determine the success and contribution of each model. This paper describes the effort by the Evaluation Key Function Committee to develop and test a methodology for identifying a set of common metrics to assess the efficiency of clinical research processes and for pilot testing these processes for collecting and analyzing metrics. The project involved more than one-fourth of all CTSAs and resulted in useful information regarding the challenges in developing common metrics, the complexity and costs of acquiring data for the metrics, and limitations on the utility of the metrics in assessing clinical research performance. The results of this process led to the identification of lessons learned and recommendations for development and use of common metrics to evaluate the CTSA effort.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)451-459
Number of pages9
JournalClinical and Translational Science
Volume8
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2015

Fingerprint

National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Health
Research
Biomedical Research
Public health
Public Health
Costs and Cost Analysis
Testing
Costs
Experiments

Keywords

  • Clinical and Translational Science Awards
  • Clinical research
  • Common metrics
  • Evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics(all)

Cite this

Rubio, D. M., Blank, A. E., Dozier, A., Hites, L., Gilliam, V. A., Hunt, J., ... Trochim, W. M. (2015). Developing Common Metrics for the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSAs): Lessons Learned. Clinical and Translational Science, 8(5), 451-459. https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.12296

Developing Common Metrics for the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSAs) : Lessons Learned. / Rubio, Doris M.; Blank, Arthur E.; Dozier, Ann; Hites, Lisle; Gilliam, Victoria A.; Hunt, Joe; Rainwater, Julie; Trochim, William M.

In: Clinical and Translational Science, Vol. 8, No. 5, 01.10.2015, p. 451-459.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rubio, DM, Blank, AE, Dozier, A, Hites, L, Gilliam, VA, Hunt, J, Rainwater, J & Trochim, WM 2015, 'Developing Common Metrics for the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSAs): Lessons Learned', Clinical and Translational Science, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 451-459. https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.12296
Rubio, Doris M. ; Blank, Arthur E. ; Dozier, Ann ; Hites, Lisle ; Gilliam, Victoria A. ; Hunt, Joe ; Rainwater, Julie ; Trochim, William M. / Developing Common Metrics for the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSAs) : Lessons Learned. In: Clinical and Translational Science. 2015 ; Vol. 8, No. 5. pp. 451-459.
@article{07970f5d099a4de78e0bdccc1ebc954b,
title = "Developing Common Metrics for the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSAs): Lessons Learned",
abstract = "The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Roadmap for Medical Research initiative, funded by the NIH Common Fund and offered through the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) program, developed more than 60 unique models for achieving the NIH goal of accelerating discoveries toward better public health. The variety of these models enabled participating academic centers to experiment with different approaches to fit their research environment. A central challenge related to the diversity of approaches is the ability to determine the success and contribution of each model. This paper describes the effort by the Evaluation Key Function Committee to develop and test a methodology for identifying a set of common metrics to assess the efficiency of clinical research processes and for pilot testing these processes for collecting and analyzing metrics. The project involved more than one-fourth of all CTSAs and resulted in useful information regarding the challenges in developing common metrics, the complexity and costs of acquiring data for the metrics, and limitations on the utility of the metrics in assessing clinical research performance. The results of this process led to the identification of lessons learned and recommendations for development and use of common metrics to evaluate the CTSA effort.",
keywords = "Clinical and Translational Science Awards, Clinical research, Common metrics, Evaluation",
author = "Rubio, {Doris M.} and Blank, {Arthur E.} and Ann Dozier and Lisle Hites and Gilliam, {Victoria A.} and Joe Hunt and Julie Rainwater and Trochim, {William M.}",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/cts.12296",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "451--459",
journal = "Clinical and Translational Science",
issn = "1752-8054",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Developing Common Metrics for the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSAs)

T2 - Lessons Learned

AU - Rubio, Doris M.

AU - Blank, Arthur E.

AU - Dozier, Ann

AU - Hites, Lisle

AU - Gilliam, Victoria A.

AU - Hunt, Joe

AU - Rainwater, Julie

AU - Trochim, William M.

PY - 2015/10/1

Y1 - 2015/10/1

N2 - The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Roadmap for Medical Research initiative, funded by the NIH Common Fund and offered through the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) program, developed more than 60 unique models for achieving the NIH goal of accelerating discoveries toward better public health. The variety of these models enabled participating academic centers to experiment with different approaches to fit their research environment. A central challenge related to the diversity of approaches is the ability to determine the success and contribution of each model. This paper describes the effort by the Evaluation Key Function Committee to develop and test a methodology for identifying a set of common metrics to assess the efficiency of clinical research processes and for pilot testing these processes for collecting and analyzing metrics. The project involved more than one-fourth of all CTSAs and resulted in useful information regarding the challenges in developing common metrics, the complexity and costs of acquiring data for the metrics, and limitations on the utility of the metrics in assessing clinical research performance. The results of this process led to the identification of lessons learned and recommendations for development and use of common metrics to evaluate the CTSA effort.

AB - The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Roadmap for Medical Research initiative, funded by the NIH Common Fund and offered through the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) program, developed more than 60 unique models for achieving the NIH goal of accelerating discoveries toward better public health. The variety of these models enabled participating academic centers to experiment with different approaches to fit their research environment. A central challenge related to the diversity of approaches is the ability to determine the success and contribution of each model. This paper describes the effort by the Evaluation Key Function Committee to develop and test a methodology for identifying a set of common metrics to assess the efficiency of clinical research processes and for pilot testing these processes for collecting and analyzing metrics. The project involved more than one-fourth of all CTSAs and resulted in useful information regarding the challenges in developing common metrics, the complexity and costs of acquiring data for the metrics, and limitations on the utility of the metrics in assessing clinical research performance. The results of this process led to the identification of lessons learned and recommendations for development and use of common metrics to evaluate the CTSA effort.

KW - Clinical and Translational Science Awards

KW - Clinical research

KW - Common metrics

KW - Evaluation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84946494821&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84946494821&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/cts.12296

DO - 10.1111/cts.12296

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 451

EP - 459

JO - Clinical and Translational Science

JF - Clinical and Translational Science

SN - 1752-8054

IS - 5

ER -