Developing and testing a checklist to enhance quality in clinical ethics consultation

Lauren S. Flicker, Susannah L. Rose, Margot M. Eves, Anne Lederman Flamm, Ruchi Sanghani, Martin L. Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Checklists have been used to improve quality in many industries, including healthcare. The use of checklists, however, has not been extensively evaluated in clinical ethics consultation. This article seeks to fill this gap by exploring the efficacy of using a checklist in ethics consultation, as tested by an empirical investigation of the use of the checklist at a large academic medical system (Cleveland Clinic). The specific aims of this project are as follows: (1) to improve the quality of ethics consultations by providing reminders to ethics consultants about process steps that are important for most patient-centered ethics consultations, (2) to create consistency in the ethics consultation process across the medical system, and (3) to establish an effective educational tool for trainers and trainees in clinical ethics consultation. The checklist was developed after a thorough literature review and an iterative process of revising and testing by a group of experienced ethics consultants. To pilot test the checklist, it was distributed to 46 ethics consultants. After a six-month pilot period in which ethics professionals used the checklist during their clinical activities, a survey was distributed to all of those who used the checklist. The 10-item survey examined consultants' perceptions regarding the three aims listed above. Of the 25 survey respondents, 11 self-reported as experts in ethics consultation, nine perceived themselves to have mid-level expertise, and five self-reported as novices. The majority (68 percent) of all respondents, regardless of expertise, believed that the checklist could be a "helpful" or "very helpful" tool in the consultation process generally. Novices were more likely than experts to believe that the checklist would be useful in conducting consultations. The limitations of this study include: reduced generalizability given that this project was conducted at one medical system, utilized a small sample size, and used self-reported quality outcome measures. Despite these limitations, to the authors' knowledge this is the first investigatation of the use of a checklist systematically to improve quality in ethics consultation. Importantly, our findings shed light on ways this checklist can be used to improve ethics consultation, including its use as an educational tool. The authors hope to test the checklist with consultants in other healthcare systems to explore its usefulness in different healthcare environments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)281-290
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Clinical Ethics
Volume25
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 1 2014

Fingerprint

Ethics Consultation
Clinical Ethics
Checklist
moral philosophy
Ethicists
Consultants
expertise
Hope
Referral and Consultation
expert
Professional Ethics
professional ethics
Delivery of Health Care
Health Care Sector
trainee

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Health(social science)

Cite this

Flicker, L. S., Rose, S. L., Eves, M. M., Flamm, A. L., Sanghani, R., & Smith, M. L. (2014). Developing and testing a checklist to enhance quality in clinical ethics consultation. Journal of Clinical Ethics, 25(4), 281-290.

Developing and testing a checklist to enhance quality in clinical ethics consultation. / Flicker, Lauren S.; Rose, Susannah L.; Eves, Margot M.; Flamm, Anne Lederman; Sanghani, Ruchi; Smith, Martin L.

In: Journal of Clinical Ethics, Vol. 25, No. 4, 01.12.2014, p. 281-290.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Flicker, LS, Rose, SL, Eves, MM, Flamm, AL, Sanghani, R & Smith, ML 2014, 'Developing and testing a checklist to enhance quality in clinical ethics consultation', Journal of Clinical Ethics, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 281-290.
Flicker LS, Rose SL, Eves MM, Flamm AL, Sanghani R, Smith ML. Developing and testing a checklist to enhance quality in clinical ethics consultation. Journal of Clinical Ethics. 2014 Dec 1;25(4):281-290.
Flicker, Lauren S. ; Rose, Susannah L. ; Eves, Margot M. ; Flamm, Anne Lederman ; Sanghani, Ruchi ; Smith, Martin L. / Developing and testing a checklist to enhance quality in clinical ethics consultation. In: Journal of Clinical Ethics. 2014 ; Vol. 25, No. 4. pp. 281-290.
@article{105a2213fc0f48b984a37e6a44de5ac3,
title = "Developing and testing a checklist to enhance quality in clinical ethics consultation",
abstract = "Checklists have been used to improve quality in many industries, including healthcare. The use of checklists, however, has not been extensively evaluated in clinical ethics consultation. This article seeks to fill this gap by exploring the efficacy of using a checklist in ethics consultation, as tested by an empirical investigation of the use of the checklist at a large academic medical system (Cleveland Clinic). The specific aims of this project are as follows: (1) to improve the quality of ethics consultations by providing reminders to ethics consultants about process steps that are important for most patient-centered ethics consultations, (2) to create consistency in the ethics consultation process across the medical system, and (3) to establish an effective educational tool for trainers and trainees in clinical ethics consultation. The checklist was developed after a thorough literature review and an iterative process of revising and testing by a group of experienced ethics consultants. To pilot test the checklist, it was distributed to 46 ethics consultants. After a six-month pilot period in which ethics professionals used the checklist during their clinical activities, a survey was distributed to all of those who used the checklist. The 10-item survey examined consultants' perceptions regarding the three aims listed above. Of the 25 survey respondents, 11 self-reported as experts in ethics consultation, nine perceived themselves to have mid-level expertise, and five self-reported as novices. The majority (68 percent) of all respondents, regardless of expertise, believed that the checklist could be a {"}helpful{"} or {"}very helpful{"} tool in the consultation process generally. Novices were more likely than experts to believe that the checklist would be useful in conducting consultations. The limitations of this study include: reduced generalizability given that this project was conducted at one medical system, utilized a small sample size, and used self-reported quality outcome measures. Despite these limitations, to the authors' knowledge this is the first investigatation of the use of a checklist systematically to improve quality in ethics consultation. Importantly, our findings shed light on ways this checklist can be used to improve ethics consultation, including its use as an educational tool. The authors hope to test the checklist with consultants in other healthcare systems to explore its usefulness in different healthcare environments.",
author = "Flicker, {Lauren S.} and Rose, {Susannah L.} and Eves, {Margot M.} and Flamm, {Anne Lederman} and Ruchi Sanghani and Smith, {Martin L.}",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "281--290",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Ethics",
issn = "1046-7890",
publisher = "Journal of Clinical Ethics",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Developing and testing a checklist to enhance quality in clinical ethics consultation

AU - Flicker, Lauren S.

AU - Rose, Susannah L.

AU - Eves, Margot M.

AU - Flamm, Anne Lederman

AU - Sanghani, Ruchi

AU - Smith, Martin L.

PY - 2014/12/1

Y1 - 2014/12/1

N2 - Checklists have been used to improve quality in many industries, including healthcare. The use of checklists, however, has not been extensively evaluated in clinical ethics consultation. This article seeks to fill this gap by exploring the efficacy of using a checklist in ethics consultation, as tested by an empirical investigation of the use of the checklist at a large academic medical system (Cleveland Clinic). The specific aims of this project are as follows: (1) to improve the quality of ethics consultations by providing reminders to ethics consultants about process steps that are important for most patient-centered ethics consultations, (2) to create consistency in the ethics consultation process across the medical system, and (3) to establish an effective educational tool for trainers and trainees in clinical ethics consultation. The checklist was developed after a thorough literature review and an iterative process of revising and testing by a group of experienced ethics consultants. To pilot test the checklist, it was distributed to 46 ethics consultants. After a six-month pilot period in which ethics professionals used the checklist during their clinical activities, a survey was distributed to all of those who used the checklist. The 10-item survey examined consultants' perceptions regarding the three aims listed above. Of the 25 survey respondents, 11 self-reported as experts in ethics consultation, nine perceived themselves to have mid-level expertise, and five self-reported as novices. The majority (68 percent) of all respondents, regardless of expertise, believed that the checklist could be a "helpful" or "very helpful" tool in the consultation process generally. Novices were more likely than experts to believe that the checklist would be useful in conducting consultations. The limitations of this study include: reduced generalizability given that this project was conducted at one medical system, utilized a small sample size, and used self-reported quality outcome measures. Despite these limitations, to the authors' knowledge this is the first investigatation of the use of a checklist systematically to improve quality in ethics consultation. Importantly, our findings shed light on ways this checklist can be used to improve ethics consultation, including its use as an educational tool. The authors hope to test the checklist with consultants in other healthcare systems to explore its usefulness in different healthcare environments.

AB - Checklists have been used to improve quality in many industries, including healthcare. The use of checklists, however, has not been extensively evaluated in clinical ethics consultation. This article seeks to fill this gap by exploring the efficacy of using a checklist in ethics consultation, as tested by an empirical investigation of the use of the checklist at a large academic medical system (Cleveland Clinic). The specific aims of this project are as follows: (1) to improve the quality of ethics consultations by providing reminders to ethics consultants about process steps that are important for most patient-centered ethics consultations, (2) to create consistency in the ethics consultation process across the medical system, and (3) to establish an effective educational tool for trainers and trainees in clinical ethics consultation. The checklist was developed after a thorough literature review and an iterative process of revising and testing by a group of experienced ethics consultants. To pilot test the checklist, it was distributed to 46 ethics consultants. After a six-month pilot period in which ethics professionals used the checklist during their clinical activities, a survey was distributed to all of those who used the checklist. The 10-item survey examined consultants' perceptions regarding the three aims listed above. Of the 25 survey respondents, 11 self-reported as experts in ethics consultation, nine perceived themselves to have mid-level expertise, and five self-reported as novices. The majority (68 percent) of all respondents, regardless of expertise, believed that the checklist could be a "helpful" or "very helpful" tool in the consultation process generally. Novices were more likely than experts to believe that the checklist would be useful in conducting consultations. The limitations of this study include: reduced generalizability given that this project was conducted at one medical system, utilized a small sample size, and used self-reported quality outcome measures. Despite these limitations, to the authors' knowledge this is the first investigatation of the use of a checklist systematically to improve quality in ethics consultation. Importantly, our findings shed light on ways this checklist can be used to improve ethics consultation, including its use as an educational tool. The authors hope to test the checklist with consultants in other healthcare systems to explore its usefulness in different healthcare environments.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922515343&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922515343&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 281

EP - 290

JO - Journal of Clinical Ethics

JF - Journal of Clinical Ethics

SN - 1046-7890

IS - 4

ER -