Determinants of gating polarity of a connexin 32 hemichannel

Seunghoon Oh, Shira Rivkin, Qingxiu Tang, Vytautas Verselis, Thaddeus A. Bargiello

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is good evidence supporting the view that the transjunctional voltage sensor (Vj-sensor) of Cx32 and other Group 1 connexins is contained within a segment of the N-terminus that contributes to the formation of the channel pore. We have shown that the addition of negatively charged amino acid residues at several positions within the first 10 amino acid residues reverses the polarity of Vj-gating and proposed that channel closure is initiated by the inward movement of this region. Here, we report that positive charge substitutions of the 2nd, 5th, and 8th residues maintain the negative polarity of Vj-gating. These data are consistent with the original gating model. Surprisingly, some channels containing combinations of positive and/or negative charges at the 2nd and 5th positions display bipolar V j-gating. The appearance of bipolar gating does not correlate with relative orientation of charges at this position. However, the voltage sensitivity of bipolar channels correlates with the sign of the charge at the 2nd residue, suggesting that charges at this position may have a larger role in determining gating polarity. Taken together with previous findings, the results suggest that the polarity Vj-gating is not determined by the sign of the charge lying closest to the cytoplasmic entry of the channel, nor is it likely to result from the reorientation of an electrical dipole contained in the N-terminus. We further explore the mechanism of polarity determination by utilizing the one-dimensional Poisson-Nernst-Plank model to determine the voltage profile of simple model channels containing regions of permanent charge within the channel pore. These considerations demonstrate how local variations in the electric field may influence the polarity and sensitivity of V j-gating but are unlikely to account for the appearance of bipolar Vj-gating.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)912-928
Number of pages17
JournalBiophysical Journal
Volume87
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2004

Fingerprint

Amino Acids
Connexins
connexin 32

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics

Cite this

Determinants of gating polarity of a connexin 32 hemichannel. / Oh, Seunghoon; Rivkin, Shira; Tang, Qingxiu; Verselis, Vytautas; Bargiello, Thaddeus A.

In: Biophysical Journal, Vol. 87, No. 2, 08.2004, p. 912-928.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Oh, Seunghoon ; Rivkin, Shira ; Tang, Qingxiu ; Verselis, Vytautas ; Bargiello, Thaddeus A. / Determinants of gating polarity of a connexin 32 hemichannel. In: Biophysical Journal. 2004 ; Vol. 87, No. 2. pp. 912-928.
@article{30a10b36ac484feda57fb690dc8f8713,
title = "Determinants of gating polarity of a connexin 32 hemichannel",
abstract = "There is good evidence supporting the view that the transjunctional voltage sensor (Vj-sensor) of Cx32 and other Group 1 connexins is contained within a segment of the N-terminus that contributes to the formation of the channel pore. We have shown that the addition of negatively charged amino acid residues at several positions within the first 10 amino acid residues reverses the polarity of Vj-gating and proposed that channel closure is initiated by the inward movement of this region. Here, we report that positive charge substitutions of the 2nd, 5th, and 8th residues maintain the negative polarity of Vj-gating. These data are consistent with the original gating model. Surprisingly, some channels containing combinations of positive and/or negative charges at the 2nd and 5th positions display bipolar V j-gating. The appearance of bipolar gating does not correlate with relative orientation of charges at this position. However, the voltage sensitivity of bipolar channels correlates with the sign of the charge at the 2nd residue, suggesting that charges at this position may have a larger role in determining gating polarity. Taken together with previous findings, the results suggest that the polarity Vj-gating is not determined by the sign of the charge lying closest to the cytoplasmic entry of the channel, nor is it likely to result from the reorientation of an electrical dipole contained in the N-terminus. We further explore the mechanism of polarity determination by utilizing the one-dimensional Poisson-Nernst-Plank model to determine the voltage profile of simple model channels containing regions of permanent charge within the channel pore. These considerations demonstrate how local variations in the electric field may influence the polarity and sensitivity of V j-gating but are unlikely to account for the appearance of bipolar Vj-gating.",
author = "Seunghoon Oh and Shira Rivkin and Qingxiu Tang and Vytautas Verselis and Bargiello, {Thaddeus A.}",
year = "2004",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1529/biophysj.103.038448",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "87",
pages = "912--928",
journal = "Biophysical Journal",
issn = "0006-3495",
publisher = "Biophysical Society",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Determinants of gating polarity of a connexin 32 hemichannel

AU - Oh, Seunghoon

AU - Rivkin, Shira

AU - Tang, Qingxiu

AU - Verselis, Vytautas

AU - Bargiello, Thaddeus A.

PY - 2004/8

Y1 - 2004/8

N2 - There is good evidence supporting the view that the transjunctional voltage sensor (Vj-sensor) of Cx32 and other Group 1 connexins is contained within a segment of the N-terminus that contributes to the formation of the channel pore. We have shown that the addition of negatively charged amino acid residues at several positions within the first 10 amino acid residues reverses the polarity of Vj-gating and proposed that channel closure is initiated by the inward movement of this region. Here, we report that positive charge substitutions of the 2nd, 5th, and 8th residues maintain the negative polarity of Vj-gating. These data are consistent with the original gating model. Surprisingly, some channels containing combinations of positive and/or negative charges at the 2nd and 5th positions display bipolar V j-gating. The appearance of bipolar gating does not correlate with relative orientation of charges at this position. However, the voltage sensitivity of bipolar channels correlates with the sign of the charge at the 2nd residue, suggesting that charges at this position may have a larger role in determining gating polarity. Taken together with previous findings, the results suggest that the polarity Vj-gating is not determined by the sign of the charge lying closest to the cytoplasmic entry of the channel, nor is it likely to result from the reorientation of an electrical dipole contained in the N-terminus. We further explore the mechanism of polarity determination by utilizing the one-dimensional Poisson-Nernst-Plank model to determine the voltage profile of simple model channels containing regions of permanent charge within the channel pore. These considerations demonstrate how local variations in the electric field may influence the polarity and sensitivity of V j-gating but are unlikely to account for the appearance of bipolar Vj-gating.

AB - There is good evidence supporting the view that the transjunctional voltage sensor (Vj-sensor) of Cx32 and other Group 1 connexins is contained within a segment of the N-terminus that contributes to the formation of the channel pore. We have shown that the addition of negatively charged amino acid residues at several positions within the first 10 amino acid residues reverses the polarity of Vj-gating and proposed that channel closure is initiated by the inward movement of this region. Here, we report that positive charge substitutions of the 2nd, 5th, and 8th residues maintain the negative polarity of Vj-gating. These data are consistent with the original gating model. Surprisingly, some channels containing combinations of positive and/or negative charges at the 2nd and 5th positions display bipolar V j-gating. The appearance of bipolar gating does not correlate with relative orientation of charges at this position. However, the voltage sensitivity of bipolar channels correlates with the sign of the charge at the 2nd residue, suggesting that charges at this position may have a larger role in determining gating polarity. Taken together with previous findings, the results suggest that the polarity Vj-gating is not determined by the sign of the charge lying closest to the cytoplasmic entry of the channel, nor is it likely to result from the reorientation of an electrical dipole contained in the N-terminus. We further explore the mechanism of polarity determination by utilizing the one-dimensional Poisson-Nernst-Plank model to determine the voltage profile of simple model channels containing regions of permanent charge within the channel pore. These considerations demonstrate how local variations in the electric field may influence the polarity and sensitivity of V j-gating but are unlikely to account for the appearance of bipolar Vj-gating.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4143088047&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4143088047&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1529/biophysj.103.038448

DO - 10.1529/biophysj.103.038448

M3 - Article

C2 - 15298899

AN - SCOPUS:4143088047

VL - 87

SP - 912

EP - 928

JO - Biophysical Journal

JF - Biophysical Journal

SN - 0006-3495

IS - 2

ER -