Detection of cervical cancer and its precursors by endocervical curettage in 13,115 colposcopically guided biopsy examinations

Julia C. Gage, Mire A. Duggan, Jill G. Nation, Song Gao, Philip E. Castle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Endocervical curettage (ECC) specimens obtained during colposcopy can detect cervical cancer and precursors otherwise missed by biopsy alone, but the procedure can be painful and reduce compliance with needed follow-up. ECC is routinely performed in the Calgary Health Region colposcopy clinics, permitting a look at its real-world utility. Study Design: We analyzed pathology and colposcopy reports from 2003 to 2007. We calculated the added diagnostic utility of ECC compared with cervical biopsy alone. Results: ECC increased the diagnostic yield of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [CIN]2+) in 1.01% of 13,115 colposcopically guided biopsy examinations. Therefore, 99 ECC specimens were taken to detect 1 additional CIN2+. ECC detected 5.4% of 2443 CIN2+ subjects otherwise missed by biopsy alone. Utility was greatest among women aged 46 years or older referred after a high-grade cytology. Conclusion: ECC is rarely informative when used routinely in colposcopic practice. Older women referred after high-risk cytology benefit most from ECC.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume203
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Curettage
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Biopsy
Colposcopy
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
Cell Biology
Pathology
Health

Keywords

  • cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
  • colposcopy
  • curettage
  • diagnosis
  • endocervical sampling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Detection of cervical cancer and its precursors by endocervical curettage in 13,115 colposcopically guided biopsy examinations. / Gage, Julia C.; Duggan, Mire A.; Nation, Jill G.; Gao, Song; Castle, Philip E.

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 203, No. 5, 11.2010.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5cb6db7e15e54a97a8a5d7633e7e472f,
title = "Detection of cervical cancer and its precursors by endocervical curettage in 13,115 colposcopically guided biopsy examinations",
abstract = "Objective: Endocervical curettage (ECC) specimens obtained during colposcopy can detect cervical cancer and precursors otherwise missed by biopsy alone, but the procedure can be painful and reduce compliance with needed follow-up. ECC is routinely performed in the Calgary Health Region colposcopy clinics, permitting a look at its real-world utility. Study Design: We analyzed pathology and colposcopy reports from 2003 to 2007. We calculated the added diagnostic utility of ECC compared with cervical biopsy alone. Results: ECC increased the diagnostic yield of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [CIN]2+) in 1.01{\%} of 13,115 colposcopically guided biopsy examinations. Therefore, 99 ECC specimens were taken to detect 1 additional CIN2+. ECC detected 5.4{\%} of 2443 CIN2+ subjects otherwise missed by biopsy alone. Utility was greatest among women aged 46 years or older referred after a high-grade cytology. Conclusion: ECC is rarely informative when used routinely in colposcopic practice. Older women referred after high-risk cytology benefit most from ECC.",
keywords = "cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, colposcopy, curettage, diagnosis, endocervical sampling",
author = "Gage, {Julia C.} and Duggan, {Mire A.} and Nation, {Jill G.} and Song Gao and Castle, {Philip E.}",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.048",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "203",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Detection of cervical cancer and its precursors by endocervical curettage in 13,115 colposcopically guided biopsy examinations

AU - Gage, Julia C.

AU - Duggan, Mire A.

AU - Nation, Jill G.

AU - Gao, Song

AU - Castle, Philip E.

PY - 2010/11

Y1 - 2010/11

N2 - Objective: Endocervical curettage (ECC) specimens obtained during colposcopy can detect cervical cancer and precursors otherwise missed by biopsy alone, but the procedure can be painful and reduce compliance with needed follow-up. ECC is routinely performed in the Calgary Health Region colposcopy clinics, permitting a look at its real-world utility. Study Design: We analyzed pathology and colposcopy reports from 2003 to 2007. We calculated the added diagnostic utility of ECC compared with cervical biopsy alone. Results: ECC increased the diagnostic yield of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [CIN]2+) in 1.01% of 13,115 colposcopically guided biopsy examinations. Therefore, 99 ECC specimens were taken to detect 1 additional CIN2+. ECC detected 5.4% of 2443 CIN2+ subjects otherwise missed by biopsy alone. Utility was greatest among women aged 46 years or older referred after a high-grade cytology. Conclusion: ECC is rarely informative when used routinely in colposcopic practice. Older women referred after high-risk cytology benefit most from ECC.

AB - Objective: Endocervical curettage (ECC) specimens obtained during colposcopy can detect cervical cancer and precursors otherwise missed by biopsy alone, but the procedure can be painful and reduce compliance with needed follow-up. ECC is routinely performed in the Calgary Health Region colposcopy clinics, permitting a look at its real-world utility. Study Design: We analyzed pathology and colposcopy reports from 2003 to 2007. We calculated the added diagnostic utility of ECC compared with cervical biopsy alone. Results: ECC increased the diagnostic yield of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [CIN]2+) in 1.01% of 13,115 colposcopically guided biopsy examinations. Therefore, 99 ECC specimens were taken to detect 1 additional CIN2+. ECC detected 5.4% of 2443 CIN2+ subjects otherwise missed by biopsy alone. Utility was greatest among women aged 46 years or older referred after a high-grade cytology. Conclusion: ECC is rarely informative when used routinely in colposcopic practice. Older women referred after high-risk cytology benefit most from ECC.

KW - cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

KW - colposcopy

KW - curettage

KW - diagnosis

KW - endocervical sampling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78149281493&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78149281493&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.048

DO - 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.048

M3 - Article

C2 - 20800216

AN - SCOPUS:78149281493

VL - 203

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 5

ER -