Cytology versus visual inspection with acetic acid among women treated previously with cryotherapy in a low-resource setting

Miriam Cremer, Kimberley Bullard, Mauricio Maza, Ethel Peralta, Elizabeth Moore, Lydia Garcia, Rachel Masch, Veronica T. Lerner, Todd A. Alonzo, Juan Felix

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To compare visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) with conventional cervical cytology as a follow-up cervical cancer screening method in women who had been treated previously with cryotherapy. Methods: Salvadoran women screened with VIA and treated with cryotherapy within 3 years were eligible to participate. Study participants were rescreened with VIA, Pap smear, colposcopy, 4-quandrant biopsy, and endocervical curettage. Results: Of 147 women enrolled in the study, post-cryotherapy VIA was positive in 39 women (26.5%; 95% CI, 19.6%-34.4%). Of these 39, 1 woman had CIN 1 or higher on biopsy. Post-cryotherapy Pap smear was positive (ASCUS or higher) in 6 women (4.1%; 95% CI, 1.5%-8.7%). Of these 6, 2 women had CIN 1 or higher on biopsy. Post-cryotherapy specificity was significantly higher for Pap compared with VIA (95.8% [138/144]; 95% CI, 91.2%-98.5% vs 73.6% [106/144]; 95% CI, 65.6%-80.6%; P < 0.001). Conclusion: As the single-visit approach for cervical cancer screening gains popularity, more women will have been treated with cryotherapy. Appropriate follow-up screening is therefore vital. Cytology may be a more suitable screening method than VIA in low-resource settings for women treated previously with cryotherapy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)249-252
Number of pages4
JournalInternational Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Volume111
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cryotherapy
Acetic Acid
Cell Biology
Papanicolaou Test
Biopsy
Early Detection of Cancer
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Colposcopy
Curettage

Keywords

  • Cryotherapy
  • Cytology
  • El Salvador
  • Follow-up screening
  • Low-resource setting
  • VIA
  • Visual inspection with ascetic acid

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Cytology versus visual inspection with acetic acid among women treated previously with cryotherapy in a low-resource setting. / Cremer, Miriam; Bullard, Kimberley; Maza, Mauricio; Peralta, Ethel; Moore, Elizabeth; Garcia, Lydia; Masch, Rachel; Lerner, Veronica T.; Alonzo, Todd A.; Felix, Juan.

In: International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Vol. 111, No. 3, 01.01.2010, p. 249-252.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cremer, Miriam ; Bullard, Kimberley ; Maza, Mauricio ; Peralta, Ethel ; Moore, Elizabeth ; Garcia, Lydia ; Masch, Rachel ; Lerner, Veronica T. ; Alonzo, Todd A. ; Felix, Juan. / Cytology versus visual inspection with acetic acid among women treated previously with cryotherapy in a low-resource setting. In: International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2010 ; Vol. 111, No. 3. pp. 249-252.
@article{ce5a31a597434aad8b36ae9e453327db,
title = "Cytology versus visual inspection with acetic acid among women treated previously with cryotherapy in a low-resource setting",
abstract = "Objective: To compare visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) with conventional cervical cytology as a follow-up cervical cancer screening method in women who had been treated previously with cryotherapy. Methods: Salvadoran women screened with VIA and treated with cryotherapy within 3 years were eligible to participate. Study participants were rescreened with VIA, Pap smear, colposcopy, 4-quandrant biopsy, and endocervical curettage. Results: Of 147 women enrolled in the study, post-cryotherapy VIA was positive in 39 women (26.5{\%}; 95{\%} CI, 19.6{\%}-34.4{\%}). Of these 39, 1 woman had CIN 1 or higher on biopsy. Post-cryotherapy Pap smear was positive (ASCUS or higher) in 6 women (4.1{\%}; 95{\%} CI, 1.5{\%}-8.7{\%}). Of these 6, 2 women had CIN 1 or higher on biopsy. Post-cryotherapy specificity was significantly higher for Pap compared with VIA (95.8{\%} [138/144]; 95{\%} CI, 91.2{\%}-98.5{\%} vs 73.6{\%} [106/144]; 95{\%} CI, 65.6{\%}-80.6{\%}; P < 0.001). Conclusion: As the single-visit approach for cervical cancer screening gains popularity, more women will have been treated with cryotherapy. Appropriate follow-up screening is therefore vital. Cytology may be a more suitable screening method than VIA in low-resource settings for women treated previously with cryotherapy.",
keywords = "Cryotherapy, Cytology, El Salvador, Follow-up screening, Low-resource setting, VIA, Visual inspection with ascetic acid",
author = "Miriam Cremer and Kimberley Bullard and Mauricio Maza and Ethel Peralta and Elizabeth Moore and Lydia Garcia and Rachel Masch and Lerner, {Veronica T.} and Alonzo, {Todd A.} and Juan Felix",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.06.022",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "111",
pages = "249--252",
journal = "International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics",
issn = "0020-7292",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cytology versus visual inspection with acetic acid among women treated previously with cryotherapy in a low-resource setting

AU - Cremer, Miriam

AU - Bullard, Kimberley

AU - Maza, Mauricio

AU - Peralta, Ethel

AU - Moore, Elizabeth

AU - Garcia, Lydia

AU - Masch, Rachel

AU - Lerner, Veronica T.

AU - Alonzo, Todd A.

AU - Felix, Juan

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - Objective: To compare visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) with conventional cervical cytology as a follow-up cervical cancer screening method in women who had been treated previously with cryotherapy. Methods: Salvadoran women screened with VIA and treated with cryotherapy within 3 years were eligible to participate. Study participants were rescreened with VIA, Pap smear, colposcopy, 4-quandrant biopsy, and endocervical curettage. Results: Of 147 women enrolled in the study, post-cryotherapy VIA was positive in 39 women (26.5%; 95% CI, 19.6%-34.4%). Of these 39, 1 woman had CIN 1 or higher on biopsy. Post-cryotherapy Pap smear was positive (ASCUS or higher) in 6 women (4.1%; 95% CI, 1.5%-8.7%). Of these 6, 2 women had CIN 1 or higher on biopsy. Post-cryotherapy specificity was significantly higher for Pap compared with VIA (95.8% [138/144]; 95% CI, 91.2%-98.5% vs 73.6% [106/144]; 95% CI, 65.6%-80.6%; P < 0.001). Conclusion: As the single-visit approach for cervical cancer screening gains popularity, more women will have been treated with cryotherapy. Appropriate follow-up screening is therefore vital. Cytology may be a more suitable screening method than VIA in low-resource settings for women treated previously with cryotherapy.

AB - Objective: To compare visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) with conventional cervical cytology as a follow-up cervical cancer screening method in women who had been treated previously with cryotherapy. Methods: Salvadoran women screened with VIA and treated with cryotherapy within 3 years were eligible to participate. Study participants were rescreened with VIA, Pap smear, colposcopy, 4-quandrant biopsy, and endocervical curettage. Results: Of 147 women enrolled in the study, post-cryotherapy VIA was positive in 39 women (26.5%; 95% CI, 19.6%-34.4%). Of these 39, 1 woman had CIN 1 or higher on biopsy. Post-cryotherapy Pap smear was positive (ASCUS or higher) in 6 women (4.1%; 95% CI, 1.5%-8.7%). Of these 6, 2 women had CIN 1 or higher on biopsy. Post-cryotherapy specificity was significantly higher for Pap compared with VIA (95.8% [138/144]; 95% CI, 91.2%-98.5% vs 73.6% [106/144]; 95% CI, 65.6%-80.6%; P < 0.001). Conclusion: As the single-visit approach for cervical cancer screening gains popularity, more women will have been treated with cryotherapy. Appropriate follow-up screening is therefore vital. Cytology may be a more suitable screening method than VIA in low-resource settings for women treated previously with cryotherapy.

KW - Cryotherapy

KW - Cytology

KW - El Salvador

KW - Follow-up screening

KW - Low-resource setting

KW - VIA

KW - Visual inspection with ascetic acid

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78049529105&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78049529105&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.06.022

DO - 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.06.022

M3 - Article

C2 - 20801447

AN - SCOPUS:78049529105

VL - 111

SP - 249

EP - 252

JO - International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics

JF - International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics

SN - 0020-7292

IS - 3

ER -