Cytologic criteria for the brush diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma

Jonathan H. Hughes, Christopher J. Leigh, Stephen S. Raab, Sharon Y. Hook, Michael B. Cohen, Mark J. Suhrland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND. The cytologic diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma often is difficult, and the role of gastric brushing in the detection of gastric malignancy is controversial. The purpose of this study was to identify the key cytologic criteria that are most useful for establishing a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in gastric brushing specimens. METHODS. One hundred gastric brushings were reviewed retrospectively. Fifty of the specimens were obtained from patients with histologically confirmed benign lesions. The other 50 specimens were obtained from patients with histologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma. All 100 brushing specimens were reviewed without knowledge of the histologic diagnosis. Each specimen was assessed for the presence or absence of 16 different cytologic features that have been identified in the published literature as being useful for separating benign conditions from malignancy. A multiple logistic linear regression analysis was performed to determine which combination of criteria was the most useful for diagnosing gastric adenocarcinoma. RESULTS. Three key cytologic criteria were identified as being the most useful for diagnosing gastric adenocarcinoma: single atypical cells with intact cytoplasm, eccentric nuclei, and atypical naked nuclei. When at least 2 of these cytologic criteria were present, the sensitivity and specificity for detecting adenocarcinoma were 88% and 100%, respectively. Two minor cytologic criteria also were identified: nuclear hyperchromasia and nuclear molding. CONCLUSIONS. Our statistical analysis demonstrates that gastric adenocarcinoma can be diagnosed with a high degree of accuracy using gastric brushing specimens when specific cytologic criteria are applied.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)289-294
Number of pages6
JournalCancer
Volume84
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 25 1998

Fingerprint

Stomach
Adenocarcinoma
Linear Models
Neoplasms
Cytoplasm
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis
Sensitivity and Specificity

Keywords

  • Adenocarcinoma
  • Criteria
  • Gastric brush cytology
  • Logistic regression analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research
  • Oncology

Cite this

Cytologic criteria for the brush diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma. / Hughes, Jonathan H.; Leigh, Christopher J.; Raab, Stephen S.; Hook, Sharon Y.; Cohen, Michael B.; Suhrland, Mark J.

In: Cancer, Vol. 84, No. 5, 25.10.1998, p. 289-294.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hughes, Jonathan H. ; Leigh, Christopher J. ; Raab, Stephen S. ; Hook, Sharon Y. ; Cohen, Michael B. ; Suhrland, Mark J. / Cytologic criteria for the brush diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma. In: Cancer. 1998 ; Vol. 84, No. 5. pp. 289-294.
@article{355c77008755434b8377f31ab5b1b70b,
title = "Cytologic criteria for the brush diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma",
abstract = "BACKGROUND. The cytologic diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma often is difficult, and the role of gastric brushing in the detection of gastric malignancy is controversial. The purpose of this study was to identify the key cytologic criteria that are most useful for establishing a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in gastric brushing specimens. METHODS. One hundred gastric brushings were reviewed retrospectively. Fifty of the specimens were obtained from patients with histologically confirmed benign lesions. The other 50 specimens were obtained from patients with histologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma. All 100 brushing specimens were reviewed without knowledge of the histologic diagnosis. Each specimen was assessed for the presence or absence of 16 different cytologic features that have been identified in the published literature as being useful for separating benign conditions from malignancy. A multiple logistic linear regression analysis was performed to determine which combination of criteria was the most useful for diagnosing gastric adenocarcinoma. RESULTS. Three key cytologic criteria were identified as being the most useful for diagnosing gastric adenocarcinoma: single atypical cells with intact cytoplasm, eccentric nuclei, and atypical naked nuclei. When at least 2 of these cytologic criteria were present, the sensitivity and specificity for detecting adenocarcinoma were 88{\%} and 100{\%}, respectively. Two minor cytologic criteria also were identified: nuclear hyperchromasia and nuclear molding. CONCLUSIONS. Our statistical analysis demonstrates that gastric adenocarcinoma can be diagnosed with a high degree of accuracy using gastric brushing specimens when specific cytologic criteria are applied.",
keywords = "Adenocarcinoma, Criteria, Gastric brush cytology, Logistic regression analysis",
author = "Hughes, {Jonathan H.} and Leigh, {Christopher J.} and Raab, {Stephen S.} and Hook, {Sharon Y.} and Cohen, {Michael B.} and Suhrland, {Mark J.}",
year = "1998",
month = "10",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19981025)84:5<289::AID-CNCR4>3.0.CO;2-L",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "84",
pages = "289--294",
journal = "Cancer",
issn = "0008-543X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cytologic criteria for the brush diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma

AU - Hughes, Jonathan H.

AU - Leigh, Christopher J.

AU - Raab, Stephen S.

AU - Hook, Sharon Y.

AU - Cohen, Michael B.

AU - Suhrland, Mark J.

PY - 1998/10/25

Y1 - 1998/10/25

N2 - BACKGROUND. The cytologic diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma often is difficult, and the role of gastric brushing in the detection of gastric malignancy is controversial. The purpose of this study was to identify the key cytologic criteria that are most useful for establishing a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in gastric brushing specimens. METHODS. One hundred gastric brushings were reviewed retrospectively. Fifty of the specimens were obtained from patients with histologically confirmed benign lesions. The other 50 specimens were obtained from patients with histologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma. All 100 brushing specimens were reviewed without knowledge of the histologic diagnosis. Each specimen was assessed for the presence or absence of 16 different cytologic features that have been identified in the published literature as being useful for separating benign conditions from malignancy. A multiple logistic linear regression analysis was performed to determine which combination of criteria was the most useful for diagnosing gastric adenocarcinoma. RESULTS. Three key cytologic criteria were identified as being the most useful for diagnosing gastric adenocarcinoma: single atypical cells with intact cytoplasm, eccentric nuclei, and atypical naked nuclei. When at least 2 of these cytologic criteria were present, the sensitivity and specificity for detecting adenocarcinoma were 88% and 100%, respectively. Two minor cytologic criteria also were identified: nuclear hyperchromasia and nuclear molding. CONCLUSIONS. Our statistical analysis demonstrates that gastric adenocarcinoma can be diagnosed with a high degree of accuracy using gastric brushing specimens when specific cytologic criteria are applied.

AB - BACKGROUND. The cytologic diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma often is difficult, and the role of gastric brushing in the detection of gastric malignancy is controversial. The purpose of this study was to identify the key cytologic criteria that are most useful for establishing a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in gastric brushing specimens. METHODS. One hundred gastric brushings were reviewed retrospectively. Fifty of the specimens were obtained from patients with histologically confirmed benign lesions. The other 50 specimens were obtained from patients with histologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma. All 100 brushing specimens were reviewed without knowledge of the histologic diagnosis. Each specimen was assessed for the presence or absence of 16 different cytologic features that have been identified in the published literature as being useful for separating benign conditions from malignancy. A multiple logistic linear regression analysis was performed to determine which combination of criteria was the most useful for diagnosing gastric adenocarcinoma. RESULTS. Three key cytologic criteria were identified as being the most useful for diagnosing gastric adenocarcinoma: single atypical cells with intact cytoplasm, eccentric nuclei, and atypical naked nuclei. When at least 2 of these cytologic criteria were present, the sensitivity and specificity for detecting adenocarcinoma were 88% and 100%, respectively. Two minor cytologic criteria also were identified: nuclear hyperchromasia and nuclear molding. CONCLUSIONS. Our statistical analysis demonstrates that gastric adenocarcinoma can be diagnosed with a high degree of accuracy using gastric brushing specimens when specific cytologic criteria are applied.

KW - Adenocarcinoma

KW - Criteria

KW - Gastric brush cytology

KW - Logistic regression analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032566914&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032566914&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19981025)84:5<289::AID-CNCR4>3.0.CO;2-L

DO - 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19981025)84:5<289::AID-CNCR4>3.0.CO;2-L

M3 - Article

C2 - 9801203

AN - SCOPUS:0032566914

VL - 84

SP - 289

EP - 294

JO - Cancer

JF - Cancer

SN - 0008-543X

IS - 5

ER -