Criminal-thinking styles and illegal behavior among college students: Validation of the PICTS

Katrina L. McCoy, William Fremouw, Elizabeth Tyner, Carl Clegg, Jill Johansson-Love, Julia Strunk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present study examined the relation of self-reported criminal-thinking styles and self-reported illegal behavior among college students. Participants were 177 male and 216 female (N=393) undergraduate students. Participants were divided by gender and further classified into four groups of self-reported illegal behavior: control-status offenses, drug crimes, property crimes, and violent crimes against people. The psychological inventory of criminal-thinking styles (PICTS) (1) measured criminal-thinking patterns on eight scales. Results indicated that males who committed violent crimes against people endorsed significantly higher levels of distorted criminal-thinking patterns on all scales than the control-status offenses, and drug crimes groups. Interestingly, female participants who committed property crimes displayed six significantly elevated PICTS scales whereas females with violent crimes against people had significant elevations on only four of the criminal-thinking style scales. These results extend Walter's initial validation of the PICTS with incarcerated respondents to a nonincarcerated population and show potential use of the PICTS with other populations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1174-1177
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Forensic Sciences
Volume51
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Crime
Students
Psychology
Equipment and Supplies
offense
violent crime
student
drug
behavior control
Behavior Control
Criminal Behavior
Thinking
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Population
Group
gender

Keywords

  • Criminal-thinking styles
  • Forensic science
  • Illegal behavior
  • Psychological inventory of criminal-thinking styles

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Law

Cite this

Criminal-thinking styles and illegal behavior among college students : Validation of the PICTS. / McCoy, Katrina L.; Fremouw, William; Tyner, Elizabeth; Clegg, Carl; Johansson-Love, Jill; Strunk, Julia.

In: Journal of Forensic Sciences, Vol. 51, No. 5, 09.2006, p. 1174-1177.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McCoy, Katrina L. ; Fremouw, William ; Tyner, Elizabeth ; Clegg, Carl ; Johansson-Love, Jill ; Strunk, Julia. / Criminal-thinking styles and illegal behavior among college students : Validation of the PICTS. In: Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2006 ; Vol. 51, No. 5. pp. 1174-1177.
@article{60a263056ef3449aab352f9391c9f4fd,
title = "Criminal-thinking styles and illegal behavior among college students: Validation of the PICTS",
abstract = "The present study examined the relation of self-reported criminal-thinking styles and self-reported illegal behavior among college students. Participants were 177 male and 216 female (N=393) undergraduate students. Participants were divided by gender and further classified into four groups of self-reported illegal behavior: control-status offenses, drug crimes, property crimes, and violent crimes against people. The psychological inventory of criminal-thinking styles (PICTS) (1) measured criminal-thinking patterns on eight scales. Results indicated that males who committed violent crimes against people endorsed significantly higher levels of distorted criminal-thinking patterns on all scales than the control-status offenses, and drug crimes groups. Interestingly, female participants who committed property crimes displayed six significantly elevated PICTS scales whereas females with violent crimes against people had significant elevations on only four of the criminal-thinking style scales. These results extend Walter's initial validation of the PICTS with incarcerated respondents to a nonincarcerated population and show potential use of the PICTS with other populations.",
keywords = "Criminal-thinking styles, Forensic science, Illegal behavior, Psychological inventory of criminal-thinking styles",
author = "McCoy, {Katrina L.} and William Fremouw and Elizabeth Tyner and Carl Clegg and Jill Johansson-Love and Julia Strunk",
year = "2006",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00216.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "1174--1177",
journal = "Journal of Forensic Sciences",
issn = "0022-1198",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Criminal-thinking styles and illegal behavior among college students

T2 - Validation of the PICTS

AU - McCoy, Katrina L.

AU - Fremouw, William

AU - Tyner, Elizabeth

AU - Clegg, Carl

AU - Johansson-Love, Jill

AU - Strunk, Julia

PY - 2006/9

Y1 - 2006/9

N2 - The present study examined the relation of self-reported criminal-thinking styles and self-reported illegal behavior among college students. Participants were 177 male and 216 female (N=393) undergraduate students. Participants were divided by gender and further classified into four groups of self-reported illegal behavior: control-status offenses, drug crimes, property crimes, and violent crimes against people. The psychological inventory of criminal-thinking styles (PICTS) (1) measured criminal-thinking patterns on eight scales. Results indicated that males who committed violent crimes against people endorsed significantly higher levels of distorted criminal-thinking patterns on all scales than the control-status offenses, and drug crimes groups. Interestingly, female participants who committed property crimes displayed six significantly elevated PICTS scales whereas females with violent crimes against people had significant elevations on only four of the criminal-thinking style scales. These results extend Walter's initial validation of the PICTS with incarcerated respondents to a nonincarcerated population and show potential use of the PICTS with other populations.

AB - The present study examined the relation of self-reported criminal-thinking styles and self-reported illegal behavior among college students. Participants were 177 male and 216 female (N=393) undergraduate students. Participants were divided by gender and further classified into four groups of self-reported illegal behavior: control-status offenses, drug crimes, property crimes, and violent crimes against people. The psychological inventory of criminal-thinking styles (PICTS) (1) measured criminal-thinking patterns on eight scales. Results indicated that males who committed violent crimes against people endorsed significantly higher levels of distorted criminal-thinking patterns on all scales than the control-status offenses, and drug crimes groups. Interestingly, female participants who committed property crimes displayed six significantly elevated PICTS scales whereas females with violent crimes against people had significant elevations on only four of the criminal-thinking style scales. These results extend Walter's initial validation of the PICTS with incarcerated respondents to a nonincarcerated population and show potential use of the PICTS with other populations.

KW - Criminal-thinking styles

KW - Forensic science

KW - Illegal behavior

KW - Psychological inventory of criminal-thinking styles

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33749030476&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33749030476&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00216.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00216.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 17018105

AN - SCOPUS:33749030476

VL - 51

SP - 1174

EP - 1177

JO - Journal of Forensic Sciences

JF - Journal of Forensic Sciences

SN - 0022-1198

IS - 5

ER -