Peut-on se fier aux statistiques fournies par les banques de données émanant du ministère de la santé?

Translated title of the contribution: Could we trust clinical statistics from data banks of the National Health Service (NHS)?

Sarah Bellemare, M. Morin, E. Bastien, R. Girard, R. Blais, S. Dubé

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Can we accept the statistics provided by the Ministry of Health, which uses large computerized databases? Through MEDECHO, the Ministry provides to hospital managers, reports cards on different interventions. These reports compare different hospitals performances. Surgeons involved in the process hesitate to accept this information. Using the results of the performance of cholecystectomy provided by this system (Gr: A), we compared the same cohort (1 April-31 December 1996 = 346 cholecystectomies) but using specific criteria determined as relevant to our surgeons (Gr: B). The rate of complication gives a crude aftermath and no attempt was used to adjust for severity. The MEDECHO data are adjusted for severity. The global rate of complications is similar Gr: A 11%, Gr: B 12%. Major complication rate for pulmonary embolism, hemorrhage and biliary duct trauma are identical. The rate of surgical site infection is higher in Gr: B (5% vs. 2%). The patients are seen in the outpatient clinic and these observations are not included by the analytical system unless the patient has been readmitted. For our hospital, the MEDECHO data are valid and reliable even though they underestimated the wound infection rate. These results could be explained by an appropriate interpretation of the code system by the archivist and by the surgeons' precision to complete the summary sheet of hospitalization. We can conclude that these data can be used as a means to evaluate the quality of outcome of a surgical service.

Original languageFrench
Pages (from-to)11-13
Number of pages3
JournalAnnales de Chirurgie
Volume129
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

National Health Programs
Cholecystectomy
Databases
Surgical Wound Infection
Wound Infection
Ambulatory Care Facilities
Pulmonary Embolism
Hospitalization
Hemorrhage
Health
Wounds and Injuries
Surgeons

Keywords

  • Banque de données informatisée
  • Cholécystectomie
  • Cholecystectomy
  • Évaluation de la qualité
  • Hospital performance
  • Indicateurs de performance hospitalière
  • Outcome indicators
  • Quality assessment
  • Report cards

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Peut-on se fier aux statistiques fournies par les banques de données émanant du ministère de la santé? / Bellemare, Sarah; Morin, M.; Bastien, E.; Girard, R.; Blais, R.; Dubé, S.

In: Annales de Chirurgie, Vol. 129, No. 1, 02.2004, p. 11-13.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bellemare, Sarah ; Morin, M. ; Bastien, E. ; Girard, R. ; Blais, R. ; Dubé, S. / Peut-on se fier aux statistiques fournies par les banques de données émanant du ministère de la santé?. In: Annales de Chirurgie. 2004 ; Vol. 129, No. 1. pp. 11-13.
@article{8281c4a0c5764fc197e448505e7f0fca,
title = "Peut-on se fier aux statistiques fournies par les banques de donn{\'e}es {\'e}manant du minist{\`e}re de la sant{\'e}?",
abstract = "Can we accept the statistics provided by the Ministry of Health, which uses large computerized databases? Through MEDECHO, the Ministry provides to hospital managers, reports cards on different interventions. These reports compare different hospitals performances. Surgeons involved in the process hesitate to accept this information. Using the results of the performance of cholecystectomy provided by this system (Gr: A), we compared the same cohort (1 April-31 December 1996 = 346 cholecystectomies) but using specific criteria determined as relevant to our surgeons (Gr: B). The rate of complication gives a crude aftermath and no attempt was used to adjust for severity. The MEDECHO data are adjusted for severity. The global rate of complications is similar Gr: A 11{\%}, Gr: B 12{\%}. Major complication rate for pulmonary embolism, hemorrhage and biliary duct trauma are identical. The rate of surgical site infection is higher in Gr: B (5{\%} vs. 2{\%}). The patients are seen in the outpatient clinic and these observations are not included by the analytical system unless the patient has been readmitted. For our hospital, the MEDECHO data are valid and reliable even though they underestimated the wound infection rate. These results could be explained by an appropriate interpretation of the code system by the archivist and by the surgeons' precision to complete the summary sheet of hospitalization. We can conclude that these data can be used as a means to evaluate the quality of outcome of a surgical service.",
keywords = "Banque de donn{\'e}es informatis{\'e}e, Chol{\'e}cystectomie, Cholecystectomy, {\'E}valuation de la qualit{\'e}, Hospital performance, Indicateurs de performance hospitali{\`e}re, Outcome indicators, Quality assessment, Report cards",
author = "Sarah Bellemare and M. Morin and E. Bastien and R. Girard and R. Blais and S. Dub{\'e}",
year = "2004",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.anchir.2003.11.007",
language = "French",
volume = "129",
pages = "11--13",
journal = "Journal de Chirurgie Viscerale",
issn = "1878-786X",
publisher = "Elsevier Masson",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Peut-on se fier aux statistiques fournies par les banques de données émanant du ministère de la santé?

AU - Bellemare, Sarah

AU - Morin, M.

AU - Bastien, E.

AU - Girard, R.

AU - Blais, R.

AU - Dubé, S.

PY - 2004/2

Y1 - 2004/2

N2 - Can we accept the statistics provided by the Ministry of Health, which uses large computerized databases? Through MEDECHO, the Ministry provides to hospital managers, reports cards on different interventions. These reports compare different hospitals performances. Surgeons involved in the process hesitate to accept this information. Using the results of the performance of cholecystectomy provided by this system (Gr: A), we compared the same cohort (1 April-31 December 1996 = 346 cholecystectomies) but using specific criteria determined as relevant to our surgeons (Gr: B). The rate of complication gives a crude aftermath and no attempt was used to adjust for severity. The MEDECHO data are adjusted for severity. The global rate of complications is similar Gr: A 11%, Gr: B 12%. Major complication rate for pulmonary embolism, hemorrhage and biliary duct trauma are identical. The rate of surgical site infection is higher in Gr: B (5% vs. 2%). The patients are seen in the outpatient clinic and these observations are not included by the analytical system unless the patient has been readmitted. For our hospital, the MEDECHO data are valid and reliable even though they underestimated the wound infection rate. These results could be explained by an appropriate interpretation of the code system by the archivist and by the surgeons' precision to complete the summary sheet of hospitalization. We can conclude that these data can be used as a means to evaluate the quality of outcome of a surgical service.

AB - Can we accept the statistics provided by the Ministry of Health, which uses large computerized databases? Through MEDECHO, the Ministry provides to hospital managers, reports cards on different interventions. These reports compare different hospitals performances. Surgeons involved in the process hesitate to accept this information. Using the results of the performance of cholecystectomy provided by this system (Gr: A), we compared the same cohort (1 April-31 December 1996 = 346 cholecystectomies) but using specific criteria determined as relevant to our surgeons (Gr: B). The rate of complication gives a crude aftermath and no attempt was used to adjust for severity. The MEDECHO data are adjusted for severity. The global rate of complications is similar Gr: A 11%, Gr: B 12%. Major complication rate for pulmonary embolism, hemorrhage and biliary duct trauma are identical. The rate of surgical site infection is higher in Gr: B (5% vs. 2%). The patients are seen in the outpatient clinic and these observations are not included by the analytical system unless the patient has been readmitted. For our hospital, the MEDECHO data are valid and reliable even though they underestimated the wound infection rate. These results could be explained by an appropriate interpretation of the code system by the archivist and by the surgeons' precision to complete the summary sheet of hospitalization. We can conclude that these data can be used as a means to evaluate the quality of outcome of a surgical service.

KW - Banque de données informatisée

KW - Cholécystectomie

KW - Cholecystectomy

KW - Évaluation de la qualité

KW - Hospital performance

KW - Indicateurs de performance hospitalière

KW - Outcome indicators

KW - Quality assessment

KW - Report cards

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1642488151&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1642488151&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.anchir.2003.11.007

DO - 10.1016/j.anchir.2003.11.007

M3 - Article

C2 - 15019848

AN - SCOPUS:1642488151

VL - 129

SP - 11

EP - 13

JO - Journal de Chirurgie Viscerale

JF - Journal de Chirurgie Viscerale

SN - 1878-786X

IS - 1

ER -