Cough reflex sensitivity in cigarette smokers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

95 Scopus citations

Abstract

Study objectives: To evaluate cough reflex sensitivity in a population of young, healthy, male cigarette smokers. Design: Cross-sectional comparison. Setting: Academic medical center. Participants: Twenty healthy, male current-smokers (mean [± SEM] age, 32.2 ± 1.2 years). Measurements: Subjects underwent baseline spirometry followed by capsaicin cough challenge testing, which involved the inhalation of capsaicin in ascending, doubling concentrations until the concentrations inducing two or more coughs (C2) and those inducing five or more coughs (C5) were reached. The data were compared to those from a group of 50 healthy, male nonsmokers who had undergone identical cough challenge testing. Results: The two groups did not differ in terms of age or baseline pulmonary function. Cough sensitivity was significantly diminished in the current-smokers compared to control subjects. The mean (± SEM) log C2 values in smokers and nonsmokers were 1.26 ± 0.13 and 0.81 ± 0.08, respectively (p = 0.004). The mean log C5 values in smokers and nonsmokers were 2.03 ± 0.10 and 1.20 ± 0.08, respectively (p < 0.000001). Conclusions: Cough reflex sensitivity is significantly diminished in young, healthy, male current-smokers compared to a similar population of nonsmokers. The mechanism of cough suppression in smokers remains speculative but may involve long-term tobacco smoke-induced desensitization of the cough receptors within the airway epithelium.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)685-688
Number of pages4
JournalChest
Volume123
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2003

Keywords

  • Capsaicin
  • Cough
  • Pulmonary function tests
  • Smoking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cough reflex sensitivity in cigarette smokers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this