Cost-effectiveness of routine and campaign vaccination strategies in Ecuador

D. S. Shepard, R. L. Robertson, C. S M Cameron, P. Saturno, M. Pollack, J. Manceau, P. Martinez, Paul Meissner, J. Perrone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A national household coverage survey of 3697 Ecuadorean children, carried out in July 1986, provided an opportunity for a cost-effectiveness analysis of (1) routine vaccination services based in fixed facilities and (2) mass immunization campaigns. A major purpose of the campaigns was to complement the routine services and to accelerate immunization activities. Based on the coverage survey, the Program for Reduction of Maternal and Childhood Illness (PREMI) and earlier campaigns increased the proportion of children under 5 years who were fully vaccinated from 43% to 64%. In one year, the PREMI campaign was responsible for fully vaccinating 11% of children under one year, 21% of 1-2 year-old children, and 13% of all children under 5 years. The campaign also helped ensure that vaccinations were completed when children were still very young and at greatest risk. The average cost per vaccination dose (in 1985 US$ prices) was approximately $0.29 for fixed facilities and $0.83 for the PREMI campaign. Total national costs were $675 000 and $1 665 000 for routine and campaign services respectively. The cost per fully vaccinated child (FVC) was $4.39 for routine vaccination services and $8.60 for the campaign. The cost per death averted was about $1900 for routine vaccination services, $4200 for the PREMI campaign, and $3200 for the combined programme. Because of Ecuador's lower mortality rates, the costs per death averted in Ecuador from both vaccination strategies are not as low as those from studies of vaccinations in Africa. The campaigns, though less cost-effective than routine services, significantly improved the vaccination coverage of younger children who had been missed by the routine services. The costs per FVC of both the campaign and the routine services compare favourably with such programmes in other countries.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)649-662
Number of pages14
JournalBulletin of the World Health Organization
Volume67
Issue number6
StatePublished - 1989
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ecuador
Immunization Programs
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Vaccination
Costs and Cost Analysis
Mothers
Mass Vaccination
Immunization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Shepard, D. S., Robertson, R. L., Cameron, C. S. M., Saturno, P., Pollack, M., Manceau, J., ... Perrone, J. (1989). Cost-effectiveness of routine and campaign vaccination strategies in Ecuador. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 67(6), 649-662.

Cost-effectiveness of routine and campaign vaccination strategies in Ecuador. / Shepard, D. S.; Robertson, R. L.; Cameron, C. S M; Saturno, P.; Pollack, M.; Manceau, J.; Martinez, P.; Meissner, Paul; Perrone, J.

In: Bulletin of the World Health Organization, Vol. 67, No. 6, 1989, p. 649-662.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shepard, DS, Robertson, RL, Cameron, CSM, Saturno, P, Pollack, M, Manceau, J, Martinez, P, Meissner, P & Perrone, J 1989, 'Cost-effectiveness of routine and campaign vaccination strategies in Ecuador', Bulletin of the World Health Organization, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 649-662.
Shepard DS, Robertson RL, Cameron CSM, Saturno P, Pollack M, Manceau J et al. Cost-effectiveness of routine and campaign vaccination strategies in Ecuador. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 1989;67(6):649-662.
Shepard, D. S. ; Robertson, R. L. ; Cameron, C. S M ; Saturno, P. ; Pollack, M. ; Manceau, J. ; Martinez, P. ; Meissner, Paul ; Perrone, J. / Cost-effectiveness of routine and campaign vaccination strategies in Ecuador. In: Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 1989 ; Vol. 67, No. 6. pp. 649-662.
@article{bc43ff371bf24fae9f5e280c03b56ad4,
title = "Cost-effectiveness of routine and campaign vaccination strategies in Ecuador",
abstract = "A national household coverage survey of 3697 Ecuadorean children, carried out in July 1986, provided an opportunity for a cost-effectiveness analysis of (1) routine vaccination services based in fixed facilities and (2) mass immunization campaigns. A major purpose of the campaigns was to complement the routine services and to accelerate immunization activities. Based on the coverage survey, the Program for Reduction of Maternal and Childhood Illness (PREMI) and earlier campaigns increased the proportion of children under 5 years who were fully vaccinated from 43{\%} to 64{\%}. In one year, the PREMI campaign was responsible for fully vaccinating 11{\%} of children under one year, 21{\%} of 1-2 year-old children, and 13{\%} of all children under 5 years. The campaign also helped ensure that vaccinations were completed when children were still very young and at greatest risk. The average cost per vaccination dose (in 1985 US$ prices) was approximately $0.29 for fixed facilities and $0.83 for the PREMI campaign. Total national costs were $675 000 and $1 665 000 for routine and campaign services respectively. The cost per fully vaccinated child (FVC) was $4.39 for routine vaccination services and $8.60 for the campaign. The cost per death averted was about $1900 for routine vaccination services, $4200 for the PREMI campaign, and $3200 for the combined programme. Because of Ecuador's lower mortality rates, the costs per death averted in Ecuador from both vaccination strategies are not as low as those from studies of vaccinations in Africa. The campaigns, though less cost-effective than routine services, significantly improved the vaccination coverage of younger children who had been missed by the routine services. The costs per FVC of both the campaign and the routine services compare favourably with such programmes in other countries.",
author = "Shepard, {D. S.} and Robertson, {R. L.} and Cameron, {C. S M} and P. Saturno and M. Pollack and J. Manceau and P. Martinez and Paul Meissner and J. Perrone",
year = "1989",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "67",
pages = "649--662",
journal = "Bulletin of the World Health Organization",
issn = "0042-9686",
publisher = "World Health Organization",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cost-effectiveness of routine and campaign vaccination strategies in Ecuador

AU - Shepard, D. S.

AU - Robertson, R. L.

AU - Cameron, C. S M

AU - Saturno, P.

AU - Pollack, M.

AU - Manceau, J.

AU - Martinez, P.

AU - Meissner, Paul

AU - Perrone, J.

PY - 1989

Y1 - 1989

N2 - A national household coverage survey of 3697 Ecuadorean children, carried out in July 1986, provided an opportunity for a cost-effectiveness analysis of (1) routine vaccination services based in fixed facilities and (2) mass immunization campaigns. A major purpose of the campaigns was to complement the routine services and to accelerate immunization activities. Based on the coverage survey, the Program for Reduction of Maternal and Childhood Illness (PREMI) and earlier campaigns increased the proportion of children under 5 years who were fully vaccinated from 43% to 64%. In one year, the PREMI campaign was responsible for fully vaccinating 11% of children under one year, 21% of 1-2 year-old children, and 13% of all children under 5 years. The campaign also helped ensure that vaccinations were completed when children were still very young and at greatest risk. The average cost per vaccination dose (in 1985 US$ prices) was approximately $0.29 for fixed facilities and $0.83 for the PREMI campaign. Total national costs were $675 000 and $1 665 000 for routine and campaign services respectively. The cost per fully vaccinated child (FVC) was $4.39 for routine vaccination services and $8.60 for the campaign. The cost per death averted was about $1900 for routine vaccination services, $4200 for the PREMI campaign, and $3200 for the combined programme. Because of Ecuador's lower mortality rates, the costs per death averted in Ecuador from both vaccination strategies are not as low as those from studies of vaccinations in Africa. The campaigns, though less cost-effective than routine services, significantly improved the vaccination coverage of younger children who had been missed by the routine services. The costs per FVC of both the campaign and the routine services compare favourably with such programmes in other countries.

AB - A national household coverage survey of 3697 Ecuadorean children, carried out in July 1986, provided an opportunity for a cost-effectiveness analysis of (1) routine vaccination services based in fixed facilities and (2) mass immunization campaigns. A major purpose of the campaigns was to complement the routine services and to accelerate immunization activities. Based on the coverage survey, the Program for Reduction of Maternal and Childhood Illness (PREMI) and earlier campaigns increased the proportion of children under 5 years who were fully vaccinated from 43% to 64%. In one year, the PREMI campaign was responsible for fully vaccinating 11% of children under one year, 21% of 1-2 year-old children, and 13% of all children under 5 years. The campaign also helped ensure that vaccinations were completed when children were still very young and at greatest risk. The average cost per vaccination dose (in 1985 US$ prices) was approximately $0.29 for fixed facilities and $0.83 for the PREMI campaign. Total national costs were $675 000 and $1 665 000 for routine and campaign services respectively. The cost per fully vaccinated child (FVC) was $4.39 for routine vaccination services and $8.60 for the campaign. The cost per death averted was about $1900 for routine vaccination services, $4200 for the PREMI campaign, and $3200 for the combined programme. Because of Ecuador's lower mortality rates, the costs per death averted in Ecuador from both vaccination strategies are not as low as those from studies of vaccinations in Africa. The campaigns, though less cost-effective than routine services, significantly improved the vaccination coverage of younger children who had been missed by the routine services. The costs per FVC of both the campaign and the routine services compare favourably with such programmes in other countries.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024947579&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024947579&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 67

SP - 649

EP - 662

JO - Bulletin of the World Health Organization

JF - Bulletin of the World Health Organization

SN - 0042-9686

IS - 6

ER -