TY - JOUR
T1 - Coronary physiologic assessment based on angiography and intracoronary imaging
AU - Takahashi, Tatsunori
AU - Theodoropoulos, Kleanthis
AU - Latib, Azeem
AU - Okura, Hiroyuki
AU - Kobayashi, Yuhei
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Dr Toru Tanigaki, Dr Yoshiaki Kawase, and Dr Hitoshi Matsuo from Gifu Heart Center for their support to prepare figures in this review.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - Despite the current evidence supporting clinical benefits of fractional flow reserve (FFR), its uptake in the cardiac catheterization laboratory has been slow due to procedural cost and increased time with the need for maximum hyperemia. Recently, novel physiological indices derived from coronary angiography and intracoronary imaging have emerged to overcome issues with a wire-based FFR. Angiography-based FFR can be measured without vessel instrumentation and has shown excellent diagnostic performance using wire-based FFR as the reference standard. Thus, angiography-based FFR may facilitate coronary functional assessment before and after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Angiography-based index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) is another new computational index for assessing the coronary microcirculation. Although angiography-derived IMR remains in an early phase of development and requires further validation, its less-invasive nature may help broaden the adoption of microvascular functional assessment in various conditions such as myocardial infarction and cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Lastly, computational FFR based on intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography allows detailed lesion assessment from both morphological and functional standpoints. Given a growing interest in physiology‐guided PCI optimization strategies, intravascular imaging-based FFR may become the main assessment tool to confirm successful PCI.
AB - Despite the current evidence supporting clinical benefits of fractional flow reserve (FFR), its uptake in the cardiac catheterization laboratory has been slow due to procedural cost and increased time with the need for maximum hyperemia. Recently, novel physiological indices derived from coronary angiography and intracoronary imaging have emerged to overcome issues with a wire-based FFR. Angiography-based FFR can be measured without vessel instrumentation and has shown excellent diagnostic performance using wire-based FFR as the reference standard. Thus, angiography-based FFR may facilitate coronary functional assessment before and after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Angiography-based index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) is another new computational index for assessing the coronary microcirculation. Although angiography-derived IMR remains in an early phase of development and requires further validation, its less-invasive nature may help broaden the adoption of microvascular functional assessment in various conditions such as myocardial infarction and cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Lastly, computational FFR based on intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography allows detailed lesion assessment from both morphological and functional standpoints. Given a growing interest in physiology‐guided PCI optimization strategies, intravascular imaging-based FFR may become the main assessment tool to confirm successful PCI.
KW - Coronary angiography
KW - Fractional flow reserve
KW - Functional assessment
KW - Intravascular ultrasound
KW - Microcirculation
KW - Optical coherence tomography
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85112162556&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85112162556&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jjcc.2021.07.009
DO - 10.1016/j.jjcc.2021.07.009
M3 - Review article
C2 - 34384666
AN - SCOPUS:85112162556
SN - 0914-5087
VL - 79
SP - 71
EP - 78
JO - Journal of Cardiology
JF - Journal of Cardiology
IS - 1
ER -