Coronary artery bypass grafting using the radial artery: Clinical outcomes, patency, and need for reintervention

Robert F. Tranbaugh, Kamellia R. Dimitrova, Patricia Friedmann, Charles M. Geller, Loren J. Harris, Paul Stelzer, Bertram M. Cohen, Wilson Ko, Helbert Decastro, David Lucido, Darryl M. Hoffman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

66 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background-Radial artery (RA) grafts are an attractive second arterial conduit after the left internal thoracic artery (LITA) for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. However, long-term outcomes and the need for subsequent reintervention have not been defined. Methods and Results-We performed a retrospective cohort study of our single institution's 16-year experience with 1851 consecutive patients (average age, 58 years; 82% men, 36% diabetic) undergoing primary, isolated CABG with the LITA, RA, and saphenous vein as needed. Average grafts per patient were 3.8, with 2.4 arterial grafts per patient. Survival was determined using the Social Security Death Index. Grafts were nonpatent if they had a >50% stenosis, a string sign, or were occluded. Five patients (0.3%) died in hospital and 0.8% had a myocardial infarction, 1.1% a stroke, and 0.6% renal failure. Kaplan-Meier-estimated 1-, 5-, 10-, and 15-year survival was 99%, 96%, 89%, and 75%, respectively. Of the cohort, 278 symptomatic patients underwent cardiac catheterization at our institution an average of 5.0±3.8 years (range, 0.1-12 years) after CABG. Overall RA (n=420 grafts) patency was 82% and SV (n=364 grafts) patency, 47% (P<0.0001). LITA (n=287 grafts including 9 sequential grafts) patency was 85% and right internal thoracic artery (n=15 grafts) patency was 80% (P=0.6). RA patency was not different from LITA patency (P=0.3). Overall freedom from catheterization, percutaneous coronary intervention, and CABG was 85%, 97%, and 99%, respectively. Conclusions-RA grafting is a highly effective revascularization strategy providing excellent short and long-term outcomes with very low rates of reintervention. RA patency is similar to LITA patency and is much better than SV patency. RA grafting should be more widely utilized in patients undergoing CABG.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S170-S175
JournalCirculation
Volume126
Issue number11 SUPPL.1
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 11 2012

Keywords

  • CABG
  • bypass surgery
  • coronary disease
  • radial artery grafting

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Coronary artery bypass grafting using the radial artery: Clinical outcomes, patency, and need for reintervention'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Tranbaugh, R. F., Dimitrova, K. R., Friedmann, P., Geller, C. M., Harris, L. J., Stelzer, P., Cohen, B. M., Ko, W., Decastro, H., Lucido, D., & Hoffman, D. M. (2012). Coronary artery bypass grafting using the radial artery: Clinical outcomes, patency, and need for reintervention. Circulation, 126(11 SUPPL.1), S170-S175. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.083048