Coronal and sagittal plane correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A comparison between all pedicle screw versus hybrid thoracic hook lumbar screw constructs

Jason E. Lowenstein, Hiroko Matsumoto, Michael G. Vitale, Mark Weidenbaum, Jaime A. Gomez, Francis Young In Lee, Joshua E. Hyman, David P. Roye

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

175 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN. This was a retrospective cohort study using a previously matched convenience sample of 34 patients. OBJECTIVE. This study sought to determine the relative corrective benefits of these 2 types of constructs in the correction of coronal and sagittal curves in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). In addition, the 2 constructs were compared for coronal and sagittal balance. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND INFORMATION. Recent clinical research suggests that thoracic pedicle screw constructs (all-screw constructs) are more effective than hybrid lumbar screw thoracic hook constructs (hybrid constructs) in correcting spine deformity. METHODS. The sample consisted of patients with AIS who underwent isolated posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation. Seventeen patients underwent fusion using all-screw constructs, and 17 underwent fusion with hybrid constructs; preoperative and postoperative radiographs and measurements were compared. RESULTS. There was no significant difference observed when comparing the 2 groups, although there was a trend toward better correction of the main thoracic curve in the all-screw construct group (P = 0.089). In the all-screw group, mean thoracic kyphosis decreased from 29.6° to 19.4° (P = 0.012). Sagittal balance changed in the hybrid group from -21.2 mm to 8.2 mm, and in the all-screw group changed from -28.8 mm to 1.5 mm. The major curve in the hybrid group improved from 54.06° to 20.25° and improved from 54.88° to 15.06° in the all-screw group. CONCLUSIONS. There was no statistically significant difference comparing the 2 groups, although a trend was observed toward better correction of the main thoracic curve in the all-screw construct group. The all-screw group demonstrated a significant decrease in kyphosis, which was not seen in the hybrid group. Hybrid constructs were comparable to all-screw constructs in the correction of coronal plane deformity and sagittal balance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)448-452
Number of pages5
JournalSpine
Volume32
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Scoliosis
Thorax
Kyphosis
Spinal Fusion
Spine
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies
Pedicle Screws
Research

Keywords

  • Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
  • Hybrid lumbar screw thoracic hook construct
  • Kyphosis
  • Thoracic pedicle screw

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Coronal and sagittal plane correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis : A comparison between all pedicle screw versus hybrid thoracic hook lumbar screw constructs. / Lowenstein, Jason E.; Matsumoto, Hiroko; Vitale, Michael G.; Weidenbaum, Mark; Gomez, Jaime A.; Lee, Francis Young In; Hyman, Joshua E.; Roye, David P.

In: Spine, Vol. 32, No. 4, 02.2007, p. 448-452.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lowenstein, Jason E. ; Matsumoto, Hiroko ; Vitale, Michael G. ; Weidenbaum, Mark ; Gomez, Jaime A. ; Lee, Francis Young In ; Hyman, Joshua E. ; Roye, David P. / Coronal and sagittal plane correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis : A comparison between all pedicle screw versus hybrid thoracic hook lumbar screw constructs. In: Spine. 2007 ; Vol. 32, No. 4. pp. 448-452.
@article{b1075631a8084cbab6e6a631ab4da989,
title = "Coronal and sagittal plane correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A comparison between all pedicle screw versus hybrid thoracic hook lumbar screw constructs",
abstract = "STUDY DESIGN. This was a retrospective cohort study using a previously matched convenience sample of 34 patients. OBJECTIVE. This study sought to determine the relative corrective benefits of these 2 types of constructs in the correction of coronal and sagittal curves in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). In addition, the 2 constructs were compared for coronal and sagittal balance. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND INFORMATION. Recent clinical research suggests that thoracic pedicle screw constructs (all-screw constructs) are more effective than hybrid lumbar screw thoracic hook constructs (hybrid constructs) in correcting spine deformity. METHODS. The sample consisted of patients with AIS who underwent isolated posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation. Seventeen patients underwent fusion using all-screw constructs, and 17 underwent fusion with hybrid constructs; preoperative and postoperative radiographs and measurements were compared. RESULTS. There was no significant difference observed when comparing the 2 groups, although there was a trend toward better correction of the main thoracic curve in the all-screw construct group (P = 0.089). In the all-screw group, mean thoracic kyphosis decreased from 29.6° to 19.4° (P = 0.012). Sagittal balance changed in the hybrid group from -21.2 mm to 8.2 mm, and in the all-screw group changed from -28.8 mm to 1.5 mm. The major curve in the hybrid group improved from 54.06° to 20.25° and improved from 54.88° to 15.06° in the all-screw group. CONCLUSIONS. There was no statistically significant difference comparing the 2 groups, although a trend was observed toward better correction of the main thoracic curve in the all-screw construct group. The all-screw group demonstrated a significant decrease in kyphosis, which was not seen in the hybrid group. Hybrid constructs were comparable to all-screw constructs in the correction of coronal plane deformity and sagittal balance.",
keywords = "Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, Hybrid lumbar screw thoracic hook construct, Kyphosis, Thoracic pedicle screw",
author = "Lowenstein, {Jason E.} and Hiroko Matsumoto and Vitale, {Michael G.} and Mark Weidenbaum and Gomez, {Jaime A.} and Lee, {Francis Young In} and Hyman, {Joshua E.} and Roye, {David P.}",
year = "2007",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1097/01.brs.0000255030.78293.fd",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "448--452",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Coronal and sagittal plane correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

T2 - A comparison between all pedicle screw versus hybrid thoracic hook lumbar screw constructs

AU - Lowenstein, Jason E.

AU - Matsumoto, Hiroko

AU - Vitale, Michael G.

AU - Weidenbaum, Mark

AU - Gomez, Jaime A.

AU - Lee, Francis Young In

AU - Hyman, Joshua E.

AU - Roye, David P.

PY - 2007/2

Y1 - 2007/2

N2 - STUDY DESIGN. This was a retrospective cohort study using a previously matched convenience sample of 34 patients. OBJECTIVE. This study sought to determine the relative corrective benefits of these 2 types of constructs in the correction of coronal and sagittal curves in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). In addition, the 2 constructs were compared for coronal and sagittal balance. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND INFORMATION. Recent clinical research suggests that thoracic pedicle screw constructs (all-screw constructs) are more effective than hybrid lumbar screw thoracic hook constructs (hybrid constructs) in correcting spine deformity. METHODS. The sample consisted of patients with AIS who underwent isolated posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation. Seventeen patients underwent fusion using all-screw constructs, and 17 underwent fusion with hybrid constructs; preoperative and postoperative radiographs and measurements were compared. RESULTS. There was no significant difference observed when comparing the 2 groups, although there was a trend toward better correction of the main thoracic curve in the all-screw construct group (P = 0.089). In the all-screw group, mean thoracic kyphosis decreased from 29.6° to 19.4° (P = 0.012). Sagittal balance changed in the hybrid group from -21.2 mm to 8.2 mm, and in the all-screw group changed from -28.8 mm to 1.5 mm. The major curve in the hybrid group improved from 54.06° to 20.25° and improved from 54.88° to 15.06° in the all-screw group. CONCLUSIONS. There was no statistically significant difference comparing the 2 groups, although a trend was observed toward better correction of the main thoracic curve in the all-screw construct group. The all-screw group demonstrated a significant decrease in kyphosis, which was not seen in the hybrid group. Hybrid constructs were comparable to all-screw constructs in the correction of coronal plane deformity and sagittal balance.

AB - STUDY DESIGN. This was a retrospective cohort study using a previously matched convenience sample of 34 patients. OBJECTIVE. This study sought to determine the relative corrective benefits of these 2 types of constructs in the correction of coronal and sagittal curves in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). In addition, the 2 constructs were compared for coronal and sagittal balance. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND INFORMATION. Recent clinical research suggests that thoracic pedicle screw constructs (all-screw constructs) are more effective than hybrid lumbar screw thoracic hook constructs (hybrid constructs) in correcting spine deformity. METHODS. The sample consisted of patients with AIS who underwent isolated posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation. Seventeen patients underwent fusion using all-screw constructs, and 17 underwent fusion with hybrid constructs; preoperative and postoperative radiographs and measurements were compared. RESULTS. There was no significant difference observed when comparing the 2 groups, although there was a trend toward better correction of the main thoracic curve in the all-screw construct group (P = 0.089). In the all-screw group, mean thoracic kyphosis decreased from 29.6° to 19.4° (P = 0.012). Sagittal balance changed in the hybrid group from -21.2 mm to 8.2 mm, and in the all-screw group changed from -28.8 mm to 1.5 mm. The major curve in the hybrid group improved from 54.06° to 20.25° and improved from 54.88° to 15.06° in the all-screw group. CONCLUSIONS. There was no statistically significant difference comparing the 2 groups, although a trend was observed toward better correction of the main thoracic curve in the all-screw construct group. The all-screw group demonstrated a significant decrease in kyphosis, which was not seen in the hybrid group. Hybrid constructs were comparable to all-screw constructs in the correction of coronal plane deformity and sagittal balance.

KW - Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

KW - Hybrid lumbar screw thoracic hook construct

KW - Kyphosis

KW - Thoracic pedicle screw

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33847043033&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33847043033&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.brs.0000255030.78293.fd

DO - 10.1097/01.brs.0000255030.78293.fd

M3 - Article

C2 - 17304136

AN - SCOPUS:33847043033

VL - 32

SP - 448

EP - 452

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 4

ER -