Contributions of discriminant analysis to differential diagnosis by self-report.

D. B. Marlowe, Scott Wetzler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We used discriminant function analyses of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI; Hathaway & McKinley, 1983), Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI; Millon, 1983), MCMI-II (Millon, 1987), and Symptom Checklist Ninety-Revised (SCL-90-R; Derogatis, 1983) profiles from a heterogenous group of 272 psychiatric inpatients to classify patients as depressed, manic, and/or psychotic. Most functions generated from these tests significantly discriminated depressed, manic (not MCMI-II), and psychotic (not MCMI) subjects from psychiatric controls. However, there was little improvement in diagnostic efficiency over the use of single scale elevations at specified cut scores. Functions derived from the MCMI for mania and the MCMI-II for psychosis show the most promise but require replication. The difficulty of using group profile differences for the diagnosis of individual psychiatric patients is discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)320-331
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Personality Assessment
Volume62
Issue number2
StatePublished - Apr 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

MMPI
Discriminant Analysis
Self Report
Psychiatry
Differential Diagnosis
Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory
Checklist
Bipolar Disorder
Mental Disorders
Individuality
Psychotic Disorders
Inpatients

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Contributions of discriminant analysis to differential diagnosis by self-report. / Marlowe, D. B.; Wetzler, Scott.

In: Journal of Personality Assessment, Vol. 62, No. 2, 04.1994, p. 320-331.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{734bb12011df49d698935f1172082187,
title = "Contributions of discriminant analysis to differential diagnosis by self-report.",
abstract = "We used discriminant function analyses of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI; Hathaway & McKinley, 1983), Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI; Millon, 1983), MCMI-II (Millon, 1987), and Symptom Checklist Ninety-Revised (SCL-90-R; Derogatis, 1983) profiles from a heterogenous group of 272 psychiatric inpatients to classify patients as depressed, manic, and/or psychotic. Most functions generated from these tests significantly discriminated depressed, manic (not MCMI-II), and psychotic (not MCMI) subjects from psychiatric controls. However, there was little improvement in diagnostic efficiency over the use of single scale elevations at specified cut scores. Functions derived from the MCMI for mania and the MCMI-II for psychosis show the most promise but require replication. The difficulty of using group profile differences for the diagnosis of individual psychiatric patients is discussed.",
author = "Marlowe, {D. B.} and Scott Wetzler",
year = "1994",
month = "4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "62",
pages = "320--331",
journal = "Journal of Personality Assessment",
issn = "0022-3891",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contributions of discriminant analysis to differential diagnosis by self-report.

AU - Marlowe, D. B.

AU - Wetzler, Scott

PY - 1994/4

Y1 - 1994/4

N2 - We used discriminant function analyses of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI; Hathaway & McKinley, 1983), Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI; Millon, 1983), MCMI-II (Millon, 1987), and Symptom Checklist Ninety-Revised (SCL-90-R; Derogatis, 1983) profiles from a heterogenous group of 272 psychiatric inpatients to classify patients as depressed, manic, and/or psychotic. Most functions generated from these tests significantly discriminated depressed, manic (not MCMI-II), and psychotic (not MCMI) subjects from psychiatric controls. However, there was little improvement in diagnostic efficiency over the use of single scale elevations at specified cut scores. Functions derived from the MCMI for mania and the MCMI-II for psychosis show the most promise but require replication. The difficulty of using group profile differences for the diagnosis of individual psychiatric patients is discussed.

AB - We used discriminant function analyses of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI; Hathaway & McKinley, 1983), Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI; Millon, 1983), MCMI-II (Millon, 1987), and Symptom Checklist Ninety-Revised (SCL-90-R; Derogatis, 1983) profiles from a heterogenous group of 272 psychiatric inpatients to classify patients as depressed, manic, and/or psychotic. Most functions generated from these tests significantly discriminated depressed, manic (not MCMI-II), and psychotic (not MCMI) subjects from psychiatric controls. However, there was little improvement in diagnostic efficiency over the use of single scale elevations at specified cut scores. Functions derived from the MCMI for mania and the MCMI-II for psychosis show the most promise but require replication. The difficulty of using group profile differences for the diagnosis of individual psychiatric patients is discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028418544&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028418544&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 62

SP - 320

EP - 331

JO - Journal of Personality Assessment

JF - Journal of Personality Assessment

SN - 0022-3891

IS - 2

ER -