Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Survival Improves With Multidisciplinary Approach

Ulrich P. Jorde, Aman M. Shah, Daniel B. Sims, Shivank Madan, Nida Siddiqi, Anne Luke, Omar Saeed, Snehal R. Patel, Sandhya Murthy, Jooyoung (Julia) Shin, Johanna Oviedo, Sade Watts, William A. Jakobleff, Stephen J. Forest, Sasa Vukelic, Dimitri Belov, Yoram A. Puius, Grace Y. Minamoto, Victoria Muggia, Anthony J. CarleseSharon S. Leung, Marjan Rahmanian, Jonathan D. Leff, Daniel J. Goldstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices have revolutionized the management of advanced heart failure. Device complications continue to limit survival, but enhanced management strategies have shown promise. This study compared outcomes for HeartMate II recipients before and after implementation of a multidisciplinary continuous support heart team (HTMCS) strategy. Methods: Between January 2012 and December 2016, 124 consecutive patients underwent primary HeartMate II implantation at our institution. In January 2015, we instituted a HTMCS approach consisting of (1) daily simultaneous cardiology/cardiac surgery/critical care/pharmacy/coordinator rounds, (2) pharmacist-directed anticoagulation, (3) speed optimization echocardiogram before discharge, (4) comprehensive device thrombosis screening and early intervention, (5) blood pressure clinic with pulsatility-adjusted goals, (6) early follow-up after discharge and individual long-term coordinator/cardiologist assignment, and (7) systematic basic/advanced/expert training and credentialing of ancillary in-hospital providers. All patients completed 1-year of follow-up. Results: Demographic characteristics for pre-HTMCS (n = 71) and HTMCS (n = 53) groups, including age (55.8 ± 12.1 versus 52.5 ± 14.1 years, p = not significant), percentage of men (77.5% versus 71.7%, p = not significant), and Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support class 3 (84.5% versus 83.0%, p = not significant), were comparable. One-year survival was 74.6% versus 100% for the pre-HTMCS and HTMCS groups, respectively (p = 0.0002). One-year survival free of serious adverse events (reoperation to replace device or disabling stroke) was 70.4% versus 84.9% for the pre-HTMCS and HTMCS groups, respectively (p = 0.059). Event per patient-year rates for disabling stroke (0.15 versus 0, p = 0.019), gastrointestinal bleeding (0.87 versus 0.51, p = 0.11), and driveline infection (0.24 versus 0.10, p = 0.18) were lower for the HTMCS group, whereas pump thrombosis requiring device exchange was higher (0.09 versus 0.18, p = 0.14). Conclusions: Implementing a comprehensive multidisciplinary approach substantially improved outcomes for recipients of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAnnals of Thoracic Surgery
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Heart-Assist Devices
Equipment and Supplies
Survival
Thrombosis
Stroke
Credentialing
Critical Care
Cardiology
Reoperation
Pharmacists
Thoracic Surgery
Registries
Heart Failure
Age Groups
Demography
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Hemorrhage
Blood Pressure
Infection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

@article{c6e5c87668a34f17be815728bdaee3f4,
title = "Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Survival Improves With Multidisciplinary Approach",
abstract = "Background: Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices have revolutionized the management of advanced heart failure. Device complications continue to limit survival, but enhanced management strategies have shown promise. This study compared outcomes for HeartMate II recipients before and after implementation of a multidisciplinary continuous support heart team (HTMCS) strategy. Methods: Between January 2012 and December 2016, 124 consecutive patients underwent primary HeartMate II implantation at our institution. In January 2015, we instituted a HTMCS approach consisting of (1) daily simultaneous cardiology/cardiac surgery/critical care/pharmacy/coordinator rounds, (2) pharmacist-directed anticoagulation, (3) speed optimization echocardiogram before discharge, (4) comprehensive device thrombosis screening and early intervention, (5) blood pressure clinic with pulsatility-adjusted goals, (6) early follow-up after discharge and individual long-term coordinator/cardiologist assignment, and (7) systematic basic/advanced/expert training and credentialing of ancillary in-hospital providers. All patients completed 1-year of follow-up. Results: Demographic characteristics for pre-HTMCS (n = 71) and HTMCS (n = 53) groups, including age (55.8 ± 12.1 versus 52.5 ± 14.1 years, p = not significant), percentage of men (77.5{\%} versus 71.7{\%}, p = not significant), and Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support class 3 (84.5{\%} versus 83.0{\%}, p = not significant), were comparable. One-year survival was 74.6{\%} versus 100{\%} for the pre-HTMCS and HTMCS groups, respectively (p = 0.0002). One-year survival free of serious adverse events (reoperation to replace device or disabling stroke) was 70.4{\%} versus 84.9{\%} for the pre-HTMCS and HTMCS groups, respectively (p = 0.059). Event per patient-year rates for disabling stroke (0.15 versus 0, p = 0.019), gastrointestinal bleeding (0.87 versus 0.51, p = 0.11), and driveline infection (0.24 versus 0.10, p = 0.18) were lower for the HTMCS group, whereas pump thrombosis requiring device exchange was higher (0.09 versus 0.18, p = 0.14). Conclusions: Implementing a comprehensive multidisciplinary approach substantially improved outcomes for recipients of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.",
author = "Jorde, {Ulrich P.} and Shah, {Aman M.} and Sims, {Daniel B.} and Shivank Madan and Nida Siddiqi and Anne Luke and Omar Saeed and Patel, {Snehal R.} and Sandhya Murthy and Shin, {Jooyoung (Julia)} and Johanna Oviedo and Sade Watts and Jakobleff, {William A.} and Forest, {Stephen J.} and Sasa Vukelic and Dimitri Belov and Puius, {Yoram A.} and Minamoto, {Grace Y.} and Victoria Muggia and Carlese, {Anthony J.} and Leung, {Sharon S.} and Marjan Rahmanian and Leff, {Jonathan D.} and Goldstein, {Daniel J.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.01.063",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Annals of Thoracic Surgery",
issn = "0003-4975",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Survival Improves With Multidisciplinary Approach

AU - Jorde, Ulrich P.

AU - Shah, Aman M.

AU - Sims, Daniel B.

AU - Madan, Shivank

AU - Siddiqi, Nida

AU - Luke, Anne

AU - Saeed, Omar

AU - Patel, Snehal R.

AU - Murthy, Sandhya

AU - Shin, Jooyoung (Julia)

AU - Oviedo, Johanna

AU - Watts, Sade

AU - Jakobleff, William A.

AU - Forest, Stephen J.

AU - Vukelic, Sasa

AU - Belov, Dimitri

AU - Puius, Yoram A.

AU - Minamoto, Grace Y.

AU - Muggia, Victoria

AU - Carlese, Anthony J.

AU - Leung, Sharon S.

AU - Rahmanian, Marjan

AU - Leff, Jonathan D.

AU - Goldstein, Daniel J.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices have revolutionized the management of advanced heart failure. Device complications continue to limit survival, but enhanced management strategies have shown promise. This study compared outcomes for HeartMate II recipients before and after implementation of a multidisciplinary continuous support heart team (HTMCS) strategy. Methods: Between January 2012 and December 2016, 124 consecutive patients underwent primary HeartMate II implantation at our institution. In January 2015, we instituted a HTMCS approach consisting of (1) daily simultaneous cardiology/cardiac surgery/critical care/pharmacy/coordinator rounds, (2) pharmacist-directed anticoagulation, (3) speed optimization echocardiogram before discharge, (4) comprehensive device thrombosis screening and early intervention, (5) blood pressure clinic with pulsatility-adjusted goals, (6) early follow-up after discharge and individual long-term coordinator/cardiologist assignment, and (7) systematic basic/advanced/expert training and credentialing of ancillary in-hospital providers. All patients completed 1-year of follow-up. Results: Demographic characteristics for pre-HTMCS (n = 71) and HTMCS (n = 53) groups, including age (55.8 ± 12.1 versus 52.5 ± 14.1 years, p = not significant), percentage of men (77.5% versus 71.7%, p = not significant), and Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support class 3 (84.5% versus 83.0%, p = not significant), were comparable. One-year survival was 74.6% versus 100% for the pre-HTMCS and HTMCS groups, respectively (p = 0.0002). One-year survival free of serious adverse events (reoperation to replace device or disabling stroke) was 70.4% versus 84.9% for the pre-HTMCS and HTMCS groups, respectively (p = 0.059). Event per patient-year rates for disabling stroke (0.15 versus 0, p = 0.019), gastrointestinal bleeding (0.87 versus 0.51, p = 0.11), and driveline infection (0.24 versus 0.10, p = 0.18) were lower for the HTMCS group, whereas pump thrombosis requiring device exchange was higher (0.09 versus 0.18, p = 0.14). Conclusions: Implementing a comprehensive multidisciplinary approach substantially improved outcomes for recipients of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.

AB - Background: Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices have revolutionized the management of advanced heart failure. Device complications continue to limit survival, but enhanced management strategies have shown promise. This study compared outcomes for HeartMate II recipients before and after implementation of a multidisciplinary continuous support heart team (HTMCS) strategy. Methods: Between January 2012 and December 2016, 124 consecutive patients underwent primary HeartMate II implantation at our institution. In January 2015, we instituted a HTMCS approach consisting of (1) daily simultaneous cardiology/cardiac surgery/critical care/pharmacy/coordinator rounds, (2) pharmacist-directed anticoagulation, (3) speed optimization echocardiogram before discharge, (4) comprehensive device thrombosis screening and early intervention, (5) blood pressure clinic with pulsatility-adjusted goals, (6) early follow-up after discharge and individual long-term coordinator/cardiologist assignment, and (7) systematic basic/advanced/expert training and credentialing of ancillary in-hospital providers. All patients completed 1-year of follow-up. Results: Demographic characteristics for pre-HTMCS (n = 71) and HTMCS (n = 53) groups, including age (55.8 ± 12.1 versus 52.5 ± 14.1 years, p = not significant), percentage of men (77.5% versus 71.7%, p = not significant), and Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support class 3 (84.5% versus 83.0%, p = not significant), were comparable. One-year survival was 74.6% versus 100% for the pre-HTMCS and HTMCS groups, respectively (p = 0.0002). One-year survival free of serious adverse events (reoperation to replace device or disabling stroke) was 70.4% versus 84.9% for the pre-HTMCS and HTMCS groups, respectively (p = 0.059). Event per patient-year rates for disabling stroke (0.15 versus 0, p = 0.019), gastrointestinal bleeding (0.87 versus 0.51, p = 0.11), and driveline infection (0.24 versus 0.10, p = 0.18) were lower for the HTMCS group, whereas pump thrombosis requiring device exchange was higher (0.09 versus 0.18, p = 0.14). Conclusions: Implementing a comprehensive multidisciplinary approach substantially improved outcomes for recipients of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066923943&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066923943&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.01.063

DO - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.01.063

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85066923943

JO - Annals of Thoracic Surgery

JF - Annals of Thoracic Surgery

SN - 0003-4975

ER -