Conservation of amino acids in multiple alignments: Aspartic acid has unexpected conservation

Andras Fiser, István Simon, Geoffrey J. Barton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Analysis of the relationship between surface accessibility and amino acid conservation in multiple sequence alignments of homologous proteins confirms expected trends for hydrophobic amino acids, but reveals an unexpected difference between the conservation of Asp, Glu and Gln. Even when not in an active site, Asp is more highly conserved than Glu. There is a clear preference for conserved and buried Asp to be present in coil, but there is no tendency for Asp to conserve Φ/Ψ in the ++ region of the Ramachandran map. Glu does not show any preference to be conserved in a particular secondary structure. Analysis of recently derived substitution matrices (e.g. BLO-SUM) confirms that Glu tends to substitute more frequently with other amino acids than does Asp. Analysis of relative accessibility versus relative conservation for individual amino acid positions in alignments shows a negative correlation for all amino acid types. With the exception of Arg, Lys, Gly, Gln, Asp and Tyr, a relative conservation of > 2 suggests the amino acid will have a relative accessibility of < 50%. Observation of conserved Cys, Gly or Asp in a reliable multiple alignment suggests a position important for the structure of the protein. Furthermore, the Asp is likely to be involved in polar interactions through its side chain oxygen atoms. In contrast, Gln is the least conserved amino acid overall.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)225-229
Number of pages5
JournalFEBS Letters
Volume397
Issue number2-3
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 18 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Aspartic Acid
Conservation
Amino Acids
Sequence Alignment
Viperidae
Catalytic Domain
Proteins
Substitution reactions
Observation
Oxygen
Atoms

Keywords

  • Conservation analysis
  • Multiple sequence alignment
  • Protein structure prediction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics
  • Molecular Biology

Cite this

Conservation of amino acids in multiple alignments : Aspartic acid has unexpected conservation. / Fiser, Andras; Simon, István; Barton, Geoffrey J.

In: FEBS Letters, Vol. 397, No. 2-3, 18.11.1996, p. 225-229.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fiser, Andras ; Simon, István ; Barton, Geoffrey J. / Conservation of amino acids in multiple alignments : Aspartic acid has unexpected conservation. In: FEBS Letters. 1996 ; Vol. 397, No. 2-3. pp. 225-229.
@article{133f38116b6546f39ad4bc80ceefb82f,
title = "Conservation of amino acids in multiple alignments: Aspartic acid has unexpected conservation",
abstract = "Analysis of the relationship between surface accessibility and amino acid conservation in multiple sequence alignments of homologous proteins confirms expected trends for hydrophobic amino acids, but reveals an unexpected difference between the conservation of Asp, Glu and Gln. Even when not in an active site, Asp is more highly conserved than Glu. There is a clear preference for conserved and buried Asp to be present in coil, but there is no tendency for Asp to conserve Φ/Ψ in the ++ region of the Ramachandran map. Glu does not show any preference to be conserved in a particular secondary structure. Analysis of recently derived substitution matrices (e.g. BLO-SUM) confirms that Glu tends to substitute more frequently with other amino acids than does Asp. Analysis of relative accessibility versus relative conservation for individual amino acid positions in alignments shows a negative correlation for all amino acid types. With the exception of Arg, Lys, Gly, Gln, Asp and Tyr, a relative conservation of > 2 suggests the amino acid will have a relative accessibility of < 50{\%}. Observation of conserved Cys, Gly or Asp in a reliable multiple alignment suggests a position important for the structure of the protein. Furthermore, the Asp is likely to be involved in polar interactions through its side chain oxygen atoms. In contrast, Gln is the least conserved amino acid overall.",
keywords = "Conservation analysis, Multiple sequence alignment, Protein structure prediction",
author = "Andras Fiser and Istv{\'a}n Simon and Barton, {Geoffrey J.}",
year = "1996",
month = "11",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1016/S0014-5793(96)01181-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "397",
pages = "225--229",
journal = "FEBS Letters",
issn = "0014-5793",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conservation of amino acids in multiple alignments

T2 - Aspartic acid has unexpected conservation

AU - Fiser, Andras

AU - Simon, István

AU - Barton, Geoffrey J.

PY - 1996/11/18

Y1 - 1996/11/18

N2 - Analysis of the relationship between surface accessibility and amino acid conservation in multiple sequence alignments of homologous proteins confirms expected trends for hydrophobic amino acids, but reveals an unexpected difference between the conservation of Asp, Glu and Gln. Even when not in an active site, Asp is more highly conserved than Glu. There is a clear preference for conserved and buried Asp to be present in coil, but there is no tendency for Asp to conserve Φ/Ψ in the ++ region of the Ramachandran map. Glu does not show any preference to be conserved in a particular secondary structure. Analysis of recently derived substitution matrices (e.g. BLO-SUM) confirms that Glu tends to substitute more frequently with other amino acids than does Asp. Analysis of relative accessibility versus relative conservation for individual amino acid positions in alignments shows a negative correlation for all amino acid types. With the exception of Arg, Lys, Gly, Gln, Asp and Tyr, a relative conservation of > 2 suggests the amino acid will have a relative accessibility of < 50%. Observation of conserved Cys, Gly or Asp in a reliable multiple alignment suggests a position important for the structure of the protein. Furthermore, the Asp is likely to be involved in polar interactions through its side chain oxygen atoms. In contrast, Gln is the least conserved amino acid overall.

AB - Analysis of the relationship between surface accessibility and amino acid conservation in multiple sequence alignments of homologous proteins confirms expected trends for hydrophobic amino acids, but reveals an unexpected difference between the conservation of Asp, Glu and Gln. Even when not in an active site, Asp is more highly conserved than Glu. There is a clear preference for conserved and buried Asp to be present in coil, but there is no tendency for Asp to conserve Φ/Ψ in the ++ region of the Ramachandran map. Glu does not show any preference to be conserved in a particular secondary structure. Analysis of recently derived substitution matrices (e.g. BLO-SUM) confirms that Glu tends to substitute more frequently with other amino acids than does Asp. Analysis of relative accessibility versus relative conservation for individual amino acid positions in alignments shows a negative correlation for all amino acid types. With the exception of Arg, Lys, Gly, Gln, Asp and Tyr, a relative conservation of > 2 suggests the amino acid will have a relative accessibility of < 50%. Observation of conserved Cys, Gly or Asp in a reliable multiple alignment suggests a position important for the structure of the protein. Furthermore, the Asp is likely to be involved in polar interactions through its side chain oxygen atoms. In contrast, Gln is the least conserved amino acid overall.

KW - Conservation analysis

KW - Multiple sequence alignment

KW - Protein structure prediction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030592845&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030592845&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0014-5793(96)01181-7

DO - 10.1016/S0014-5793(96)01181-7

M3 - Article

C2 - 8955352

AN - SCOPUS:0030592845

VL - 397

SP - 225

EP - 229

JO - FEBS Letters

JF - FEBS Letters

SN - 0014-5793

IS - 2-3

ER -