Conducting Health Disparities Research with Criminal Justice Populations

Examining Research, Ethics, and Participation

Pamela Valera, Stephanie Cook, Ruth Macklin, Yvonne Chang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study explored the challenges of informed consent and understanding of the research process among Black and Latino men under community supervision (e.g., parole and/or probation). Between February and October 2012, we conducted cognitive face-to-face interviews using open-ended questions on the significant areas of research participation (i.e., the informed consent process, confidentiality, compensation, what is meant by human subject and clinical trials) among 259 men aged 35 to 67 under community supervision in Bronx, New York. Content analysis of the open-ended questions revealed limited knowledge concerning the understanding of research participation. The study participants appeared to generally understand concepts such as compensation after research participation and confidentiality. Participants demonstrated a lack of understanding of certain aspects of the research process-informed consent, human subject, Institutional Review Board, and clinical trials. These findings are informative to researchers conducting studies with criminal justice populations and Institutional Review Boards reviewing research studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)164-174
Number of pages11
JournalEthics and Behavior
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2014

Fingerprint

Research Ethics
Criminal Law
Health
Informed Consent
Research
Population
Research Ethics Committees
Confidentiality
Compensation and Redress
Clinical Trials
Hispanic Americans
Research Personnel
Interviews

Keywords

  • medical ethics
  • research participants
  • responsible conduct of research
  • trust

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Conducting Health Disparities Research with Criminal Justice Populations : Examining Research, Ethics, and Participation. / Valera, Pamela; Cook, Stephanie; Macklin, Ruth; Chang, Yvonne.

In: Ethics and Behavior, Vol. 24, No. 2, 03.2014, p. 164-174.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Valera, Pamela ; Cook, Stephanie ; Macklin, Ruth ; Chang, Yvonne. / Conducting Health Disparities Research with Criminal Justice Populations : Examining Research, Ethics, and Participation. In: Ethics and Behavior. 2014 ; Vol. 24, No. 2. pp. 164-174.
@article{b6b08e0cfc9a47729de0e0e562b5f8af,
title = "Conducting Health Disparities Research with Criminal Justice Populations: Examining Research, Ethics, and Participation",
abstract = "This study explored the challenges of informed consent and understanding of the research process among Black and Latino men under community supervision (e.g., parole and/or probation). Between February and October 2012, we conducted cognitive face-to-face interviews using open-ended questions on the significant areas of research participation (i.e., the informed consent process, confidentiality, compensation, what is meant by human subject and clinical trials) among 259 men aged 35 to 67 under community supervision in Bronx, New York. Content analysis of the open-ended questions revealed limited knowledge concerning the understanding of research participation. The study participants appeared to generally understand concepts such as compensation after research participation and confidentiality. Participants demonstrated a lack of understanding of certain aspects of the research process-informed consent, human subject, Institutional Review Board, and clinical trials. These findings are informative to researchers conducting studies with criminal justice populations and Institutional Review Boards reviewing research studies.",
keywords = "medical ethics, research participants, responsible conduct of research, trust",
author = "Pamela Valera and Stephanie Cook and Ruth Macklin and Yvonne Chang",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1080/10508422.2013.826581",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "164--174",
journal = "Ethics and Behavior",
issn = "1050-8422",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conducting Health Disparities Research with Criminal Justice Populations

T2 - Examining Research, Ethics, and Participation

AU - Valera, Pamela

AU - Cook, Stephanie

AU - Macklin, Ruth

AU - Chang, Yvonne

PY - 2014/3

Y1 - 2014/3

N2 - This study explored the challenges of informed consent and understanding of the research process among Black and Latino men under community supervision (e.g., parole and/or probation). Between February and October 2012, we conducted cognitive face-to-face interviews using open-ended questions on the significant areas of research participation (i.e., the informed consent process, confidentiality, compensation, what is meant by human subject and clinical trials) among 259 men aged 35 to 67 under community supervision in Bronx, New York. Content analysis of the open-ended questions revealed limited knowledge concerning the understanding of research participation. The study participants appeared to generally understand concepts such as compensation after research participation and confidentiality. Participants demonstrated a lack of understanding of certain aspects of the research process-informed consent, human subject, Institutional Review Board, and clinical trials. These findings are informative to researchers conducting studies with criminal justice populations and Institutional Review Boards reviewing research studies.

AB - This study explored the challenges of informed consent and understanding of the research process among Black and Latino men under community supervision (e.g., parole and/or probation). Between February and October 2012, we conducted cognitive face-to-face interviews using open-ended questions on the significant areas of research participation (i.e., the informed consent process, confidentiality, compensation, what is meant by human subject and clinical trials) among 259 men aged 35 to 67 under community supervision in Bronx, New York. Content analysis of the open-ended questions revealed limited knowledge concerning the understanding of research participation. The study participants appeared to generally understand concepts such as compensation after research participation and confidentiality. Participants demonstrated a lack of understanding of certain aspects of the research process-informed consent, human subject, Institutional Review Board, and clinical trials. These findings are informative to researchers conducting studies with criminal justice populations and Institutional Review Boards reviewing research studies.

KW - medical ethics

KW - research participants

KW - responsible conduct of research

KW - trust

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893347026&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893347026&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10508422.2013.826581

DO - 10.1080/10508422.2013.826581

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 164

EP - 174

JO - Ethics and Behavior

JF - Ethics and Behavior

SN - 1050-8422

IS - 2

ER -