Computer based audit of potassium monitoring

P. N. Valenstein, Evan M. Cadoff, M. D. Burke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

We conducted a computer-based audit of serum potassium monitoring at a university teaching hospital over the course of a single year. Intensive monitoring accounted for half of 59,488 potassium determinations performed by the laboratory. Strong preferences were shown for monitoring at intervals of 4, 12, 24, and 48 hours. Individual patients tended to be tested at the same interval repeatedly; the time separating two potassium determinations was significantly correlated with the time separating the previous two determinations (R2 = 0.3; P < 0.0001). The rate at which potassium was monitored was not strongly correlated with the presence of severity of potassium abnormalities revelaed in previous determinations; the coefficient of determination (R2) ranged from 0 to 0.06 for six different types of potassium abnormalities examined. These observations suggest that potassium monitoring accounts for a substantial proportion of all potassium testing and that monitoring is not being used to follow preexisting potassium abnormalities. Potassium monitoring is conducted according to fairly rigid testing protocols. However, the selection of a particular protocol may be difficult to explain with a computer-based audit focused on laboratory data.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)102-106
Number of pages5
JournalInformatics in Pathology
Volume2
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1987
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Potassium
Teaching Hospitals
Serum

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Valenstein, P. N., Cadoff, E. M., & Burke, M. D. (1987). Computer based audit of potassium monitoring. Informatics in Pathology, 2(2), 102-106.

Computer based audit of potassium monitoring. / Valenstein, P. N.; Cadoff, Evan M.; Burke, M. D.

In: Informatics in Pathology, Vol. 2, No. 2, 1987, p. 102-106.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Valenstein, PN, Cadoff, EM & Burke, MD 1987, 'Computer based audit of potassium monitoring', Informatics in Pathology, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 102-106.
Valenstein, P. N. ; Cadoff, Evan M. ; Burke, M. D. / Computer based audit of potassium monitoring. In: Informatics in Pathology. 1987 ; Vol. 2, No. 2. pp. 102-106.
@article{18fec8358ff44c9a884bdb2c4cc9b965,
title = "Computer based audit of potassium monitoring",
abstract = "We conducted a computer-based audit of serum potassium monitoring at a university teaching hospital over the course of a single year. Intensive monitoring accounted for half of 59,488 potassium determinations performed by the laboratory. Strong preferences were shown for monitoring at intervals of 4, 12, 24, and 48 hours. Individual patients tended to be tested at the same interval repeatedly; the time separating two potassium determinations was significantly correlated with the time separating the previous two determinations (R2 = 0.3; P < 0.0001). The rate at which potassium was monitored was not strongly correlated with the presence of severity of potassium abnormalities revelaed in previous determinations; the coefficient of determination (R2) ranged from 0 to 0.06 for six different types of potassium abnormalities examined. These observations suggest that potassium monitoring accounts for a substantial proportion of all potassium testing and that monitoring is not being used to follow preexisting potassium abnormalities. Potassium monitoring is conducted according to fairly rigid testing protocols. However, the selection of a particular protocol may be difficult to explain with a computer-based audit focused on laboratory data.",
author = "Valenstein, {P. N.} and Cadoff, {Evan M.} and Burke, {M. D.}",
year = "1987",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "102--106",
journal = "Informatics in Pathology",
issn = "0883-9425",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Computer based audit of potassium monitoring

AU - Valenstein, P. N.

AU - Cadoff, Evan M.

AU - Burke, M. D.

PY - 1987

Y1 - 1987

N2 - We conducted a computer-based audit of serum potassium monitoring at a university teaching hospital over the course of a single year. Intensive monitoring accounted for half of 59,488 potassium determinations performed by the laboratory. Strong preferences were shown for monitoring at intervals of 4, 12, 24, and 48 hours. Individual patients tended to be tested at the same interval repeatedly; the time separating two potassium determinations was significantly correlated with the time separating the previous two determinations (R2 = 0.3; P < 0.0001). The rate at which potassium was monitored was not strongly correlated with the presence of severity of potassium abnormalities revelaed in previous determinations; the coefficient of determination (R2) ranged from 0 to 0.06 for six different types of potassium abnormalities examined. These observations suggest that potassium monitoring accounts for a substantial proportion of all potassium testing and that monitoring is not being used to follow preexisting potassium abnormalities. Potassium monitoring is conducted according to fairly rigid testing protocols. However, the selection of a particular protocol may be difficult to explain with a computer-based audit focused on laboratory data.

AB - We conducted a computer-based audit of serum potassium monitoring at a university teaching hospital over the course of a single year. Intensive monitoring accounted for half of 59,488 potassium determinations performed by the laboratory. Strong preferences were shown for monitoring at intervals of 4, 12, 24, and 48 hours. Individual patients tended to be tested at the same interval repeatedly; the time separating two potassium determinations was significantly correlated with the time separating the previous two determinations (R2 = 0.3; P < 0.0001). The rate at which potassium was monitored was not strongly correlated with the presence of severity of potassium abnormalities revelaed in previous determinations; the coefficient of determination (R2) ranged from 0 to 0.06 for six different types of potassium abnormalities examined. These observations suggest that potassium monitoring accounts for a substantial proportion of all potassium testing and that monitoring is not being used to follow preexisting potassium abnormalities. Potassium monitoring is conducted according to fairly rigid testing protocols. However, the selection of a particular protocol may be difficult to explain with a computer-based audit focused on laboratory data.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023633435&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023633435&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0023633435

VL - 2

SP - 102

EP - 106

JO - Informatics in Pathology

JF - Informatics in Pathology

SN - 0883-9425

IS - 2

ER -