TY - JOUR
T1 - Composite Index Tagging for PVI in Paroxysmal AF
T2 - A Prospective, Multicenter Postapproval Study
AU - SURPOINT Postapproval Trial Investigators
AU - Di Biase, Luigi
AU - Monir, George
AU - Melby, Daniel
AU - Tabereaux, Paul
AU - Natale, Andrea
AU - Manyam, Harish
AU - Athill, Charles
AU - Delaughter, Craig
AU - Patel, Anshul
AU - Gentlesk, Philip
AU - Liu, Christopher
AU - Arkles, Jeffrey
AU - McElderry, Hugh Thomas
AU - Osorio, Jose
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was funded by Biosense Webster, Inc. Dr Di Biase has received consulting fees from Biosense Webster, Inc., Stereotaxis, and Rhythm Management; and has received speaker honoraria/travel compensation from Biosense Webster, Inc., St. Jude Medical (now Abbott), Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Biotronik, AtriCure, Baylis, and Zoll. Dr Melby has received consulting fees and speaker honoraria/travel compensation from Biosense Webster, Inc. Dr Natale has received consulting fees from Abbott, Baylis, Biosense Webster, Inc., Biotronik, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic. Dr Manyam has received consulting fees from Abbott and Janssen Pharmaceuticals. Dr Athill has received consulting fees from Biosense Webster, Inc., Abbott, and Boston Scientific; and has received speaker honoraria/travel compensation from Zoll and Janssen Pharmaceuticals. Dr Delaughter has received consulting fees from Biosense Webster, Inc. Drs Patel and McElderry, Jr., have received speaker honoraria/travel compensation from Biosense Webster, Inc. Dr Arkles has received speaker honoraria/travel compensation from Varian and Abbott. Dr Osorio has received consulting fees from Biosense Webster, Inc., Boston Scientific, and Medtronic; has received speaker honoraria/travel compensation from Biosense Webster, Inc., and Boston Scientific; and has received grants/contracts from Biosense Webster, Inc., and Abbott. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors
PY - 2022/9
Y1 - 2022/9
N2 - Background: VISITAG SURPOINT (VS)–guided ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation has demonstrated good short- and long-term success rates with low rates of complications in recent, predominantly European, studies. However, there is a lack of multicenter data from the United States. Objectives: This U.S. study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of VS ablation using a contact force–sensing catheter for the treatment of drug-refractory symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Methods: The prospective, nonrandomized VS postapproval study was conducted at 32 U.S. sites. Ablation consisted of pulmonary vein isolation with recommended VS index targets (anterior, roof, or ridge: 550; posterior or inferior: 380). Additional non–pulmonary vein triggers were ablated at the investigators’ discretion. Subjects were followed for 12 months, including a 3-month blanking period. The primary safety endpoint was the primary adverse event rate up to 7 days postablation. The primary effectiveness endpoint was 12-month freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence and an additional set of failure modes based on stringent monitoring (weekly transtelephonic monitoring [TTM] [day 91 through month 5], monthly TTM [months 6 to 12], and any symptomatic cardiac episode using TTM, plus electrocardiogram [at discharge, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months] with 24-hour Holter monitoring [12 months]). Results: Of 283 patients enrolled, 261 had the catheter inserted and underwent ablation (safety cohort); 246 met all eligibility criteria (effectiveness cohort). Mean fluoroscopy time was 2.2 minutes. Mean amount of catheter-delivered fluid was 671 mL; only 18.0% of patients utilized a Foley catheter. Primary safety and effectiveness endpoints were met. The raw primary adverse event rate was 4.3% (14 events, n = 11). At 12 months, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from primary effectiveness failure was 76.4%; estimates of 12-month freedom from documented atrial fibrillation, atrial tachycardia, or atrial flutter recurrence were 81.5% and 92.7% per stringent monitoring and standard-of-care monitoring (excluding TTM), respectively. The first-pass isolation rate was 83.1%, represented by no acute reconnection after the 30-minute waiting period. Freedom from repeat ablation at 12 months was 94.0%. Conclusions: The VS postapproval study confirms reproducibility of clinical safety and effectiveness of the standardized VS paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation workflow with >80% 12-month freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence and first-pass isolation rate of 83.1%. Procedures were performed with minimal fluoroscopy.
AB - Background: VISITAG SURPOINT (VS)–guided ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation has demonstrated good short- and long-term success rates with low rates of complications in recent, predominantly European, studies. However, there is a lack of multicenter data from the United States. Objectives: This U.S. study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of VS ablation using a contact force–sensing catheter for the treatment of drug-refractory symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Methods: The prospective, nonrandomized VS postapproval study was conducted at 32 U.S. sites. Ablation consisted of pulmonary vein isolation with recommended VS index targets (anterior, roof, or ridge: 550; posterior or inferior: 380). Additional non–pulmonary vein triggers were ablated at the investigators’ discretion. Subjects were followed for 12 months, including a 3-month blanking period. The primary safety endpoint was the primary adverse event rate up to 7 days postablation. The primary effectiveness endpoint was 12-month freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence and an additional set of failure modes based on stringent monitoring (weekly transtelephonic monitoring [TTM] [day 91 through month 5], monthly TTM [months 6 to 12], and any symptomatic cardiac episode using TTM, plus electrocardiogram [at discharge, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months] with 24-hour Holter monitoring [12 months]). Results: Of 283 patients enrolled, 261 had the catheter inserted and underwent ablation (safety cohort); 246 met all eligibility criteria (effectiveness cohort). Mean fluoroscopy time was 2.2 minutes. Mean amount of catheter-delivered fluid was 671 mL; only 18.0% of patients utilized a Foley catheter. Primary safety and effectiveness endpoints were met. The raw primary adverse event rate was 4.3% (14 events, n = 11). At 12 months, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from primary effectiveness failure was 76.4%; estimates of 12-month freedom from documented atrial fibrillation, atrial tachycardia, or atrial flutter recurrence were 81.5% and 92.7% per stringent monitoring and standard-of-care monitoring (excluding TTM), respectively. The first-pass isolation rate was 83.1%, represented by no acute reconnection after the 30-minute waiting period. Freedom from repeat ablation at 12 months was 94.0%. Conclusions: The VS postapproval study confirms reproducibility of clinical safety and effectiveness of the standardized VS paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation workflow with >80% 12-month freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence and first-pass isolation rate of 83.1%. Procedures were performed with minimal fluoroscopy.
KW - SMARTTOUCH
KW - VISITAG SURPOINT
KW - atrial fibrillation
KW - contact force catheter
KW - paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
KW - pulmonary vein isolation
KW - radiofrequency ablation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85137725642&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85137725642&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jacep.2022.06.007
DO - 10.1016/j.jacep.2022.06.007
M3 - Article
C2 - 36137711
AN - SCOPUS:85137725642
SN - 2405-5018
VL - 8
SP - 1077
EP - 1089
JO - JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
JF - JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
IS - 9
ER -