Comparison of visceral adipose tissue quantification on water suppressed and nonwater-suppressed MRI at 3.0 tesla

Anqi Zhou, Horacio Murillo, Kenneth Cusi, Qi Peng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To systematically evaluate and compare the performance of water-saturated and nonwater-saturated T1-weighted 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the application of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) quantification. Materials and Methods: Forty-five patients underwent abdomen MRI using two different sequences at 3.0 T: 1) a traditional T1-weighted gradient echo sequence, and 2) the same sequence with water presaturation to enhance fat and nonfat contrast. VAT amounts from both water-saturated and nonwater-saturated images were quantified with a manual thresholding technique and an automated segmentation method to study quantification variability and consistency of the two imaging techniques. Results: Nonwater-saturated MRI had significantly larger coefficient of variation than water-saturated MRI in the imaging reproducibility study based on 112 slices from seven subjects (11.4% vs. 2.5%, P < 0.0001). VAT volumes measured from the nonwater-saturation MRI sequence had significantly higher variability than those from water-saturation images even when using a manual quantification method based on images from 38 subjects (1.76% vs. 1.08%, P < 0.001). In addition, the VAT volume amounts from nonwater-saturation images and water-saturated images quantified with the automatic and manual quantification methods were statistically consistent. Conclusion: Water-saturated MRI sequences at 3.0 T for VAT quantification improve reproducibility and decrease variability compared with nonwater saturated sequences, especially with the use of automatic quantification methods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1445-1452
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Volume35
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2012

Fingerprint

Intra-Abdominal Fat
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Water
Abdomen
Fats

Keywords

  • abdominal MRI
  • body composition
  • image segmentation
  • obesity
  • visceral adipose tissue

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Comparison of visceral adipose tissue quantification on water suppressed and nonwater-suppressed MRI at 3.0 tesla. / Zhou, Anqi; Murillo, Horacio; Cusi, Kenneth; Peng, Qi.

In: Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Vol. 35, No. 6, 06.2012, p. 1445-1452.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5f2a2e62178449faaa605a82797eced0,
title = "Comparison of visceral adipose tissue quantification on water suppressed and nonwater-suppressed MRI at 3.0 tesla",
abstract = "Purpose: To systematically evaluate and compare the performance of water-saturated and nonwater-saturated T1-weighted 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the application of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) quantification. Materials and Methods: Forty-five patients underwent abdomen MRI using two different sequences at 3.0 T: 1) a traditional T1-weighted gradient echo sequence, and 2) the same sequence with water presaturation to enhance fat and nonfat contrast. VAT amounts from both water-saturated and nonwater-saturated images were quantified with a manual thresholding technique and an automated segmentation method to study quantification variability and consistency of the two imaging techniques. Results: Nonwater-saturated MRI had significantly larger coefficient of variation than water-saturated MRI in the imaging reproducibility study based on 112 slices from seven subjects (11.4{\%} vs. 2.5{\%}, P < 0.0001). VAT volumes measured from the nonwater-saturation MRI sequence had significantly higher variability than those from water-saturation images even when using a manual quantification method based on images from 38 subjects (1.76{\%} vs. 1.08{\%}, P < 0.001). In addition, the VAT volume amounts from nonwater-saturation images and water-saturated images quantified with the automatic and manual quantification methods were statistically consistent. Conclusion: Water-saturated MRI sequences at 3.0 T for VAT quantification improve reproducibility and decrease variability compared with nonwater saturated sequences, especially with the use of automatic quantification methods.",
keywords = "abdominal MRI, body composition, image segmentation, obesity, visceral adipose tissue",
author = "Anqi Zhou and Horacio Murillo and Kenneth Cusi and Qi Peng",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1002/jmri.23582",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "1445--1452",
journal = "Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging",
issn = "1053-1807",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of visceral adipose tissue quantification on water suppressed and nonwater-suppressed MRI at 3.0 tesla

AU - Zhou, Anqi

AU - Murillo, Horacio

AU - Cusi, Kenneth

AU - Peng, Qi

PY - 2012/6

Y1 - 2012/6

N2 - Purpose: To systematically evaluate and compare the performance of water-saturated and nonwater-saturated T1-weighted 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the application of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) quantification. Materials and Methods: Forty-five patients underwent abdomen MRI using two different sequences at 3.0 T: 1) a traditional T1-weighted gradient echo sequence, and 2) the same sequence with water presaturation to enhance fat and nonfat contrast. VAT amounts from both water-saturated and nonwater-saturated images were quantified with a manual thresholding technique and an automated segmentation method to study quantification variability and consistency of the two imaging techniques. Results: Nonwater-saturated MRI had significantly larger coefficient of variation than water-saturated MRI in the imaging reproducibility study based on 112 slices from seven subjects (11.4% vs. 2.5%, P < 0.0001). VAT volumes measured from the nonwater-saturation MRI sequence had significantly higher variability than those from water-saturation images even when using a manual quantification method based on images from 38 subjects (1.76% vs. 1.08%, P < 0.001). In addition, the VAT volume amounts from nonwater-saturation images and water-saturated images quantified with the automatic and manual quantification methods were statistically consistent. Conclusion: Water-saturated MRI sequences at 3.0 T for VAT quantification improve reproducibility and decrease variability compared with nonwater saturated sequences, especially with the use of automatic quantification methods.

AB - Purpose: To systematically evaluate and compare the performance of water-saturated and nonwater-saturated T1-weighted 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the application of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) quantification. Materials and Methods: Forty-five patients underwent abdomen MRI using two different sequences at 3.0 T: 1) a traditional T1-weighted gradient echo sequence, and 2) the same sequence with water presaturation to enhance fat and nonfat contrast. VAT amounts from both water-saturated and nonwater-saturated images were quantified with a manual thresholding technique and an automated segmentation method to study quantification variability and consistency of the two imaging techniques. Results: Nonwater-saturated MRI had significantly larger coefficient of variation than water-saturated MRI in the imaging reproducibility study based on 112 slices from seven subjects (11.4% vs. 2.5%, P < 0.0001). VAT volumes measured from the nonwater-saturation MRI sequence had significantly higher variability than those from water-saturation images even when using a manual quantification method based on images from 38 subjects (1.76% vs. 1.08%, P < 0.001). In addition, the VAT volume amounts from nonwater-saturation images and water-saturated images quantified with the automatic and manual quantification methods were statistically consistent. Conclusion: Water-saturated MRI sequences at 3.0 T for VAT quantification improve reproducibility and decrease variability compared with nonwater saturated sequences, especially with the use of automatic quantification methods.

KW - abdominal MRI

KW - body composition

KW - image segmentation

KW - obesity

KW - visceral adipose tissue

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862062908&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862062908&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jmri.23582

DO - 10.1002/jmri.23582

M3 - Article

C2 - 22246813

AN - SCOPUS:84862062908

VL - 35

SP - 1445

EP - 1452

JO - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

JF - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

SN - 1053-1807

IS - 6

ER -