Comparison of the Raja and the Abrams pleural biopsy needles in patients with pleural effusion

R. G. Ogirala, V. Agarwal, L. D. Vizioli, K. L. Pinsker, T. K. Aldrich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In 31 patients with exudative pleural effusions, we compared the diagnostic yield of the Abrams pleural biopsy needle with that of a new instrument, the Raja pleural biopsy needle. Each patient was randomly biopsied with both needles, and a total of 153 pleural biopsies were done, 73 with the Abrams needle and 80 with the Raja needle. No complications resulted from biopsies with either needle. Etiologic diagnoses were possible in 38 (52%) biopsies obtained using the Abrams needle, compared with 66 (82.5%) for those using the Raja needle; the difference in proportions for the diagnostic yield was statistically significant (p < 0.01, two-tailed Fisher's exact test). There were no significant differences between the needles in obtaining etiologic diagnoses in any specific disease category. The difference between the mean size of the pleural specimens obtained with the two needles was also statistically significant (p < 0.001, Mann-Whitney U test). The Raja pleural biopsy needle is easy and safe to use, and despite its smaller external diameter yields a significantly larger pleural tissue sample and significantly increases the diagnostic yield of pleural biopsies compared with the Abrams pleural biopsy needle.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1291-1294
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Review of Respiratory Disease
Volume147
Issue number5
StatePublished - 1993

Fingerprint

Skates (Fish)
Needle Biopsy
Pleural Effusion
Needles
Biopsy
Nonparametric Statistics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Ogirala, R. G., Agarwal, V., Vizioli, L. D., Pinsker, K. L., & Aldrich, T. K. (1993). Comparison of the Raja and the Abrams pleural biopsy needles in patients with pleural effusion. American Review of Respiratory Disease, 147(5), 1291-1294.

Comparison of the Raja and the Abrams pleural biopsy needles in patients with pleural effusion. / Ogirala, R. G.; Agarwal, V.; Vizioli, L. D.; Pinsker, K. L.; Aldrich, T. K.

In: American Review of Respiratory Disease, Vol. 147, No. 5, 1993, p. 1291-1294.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ogirala, RG, Agarwal, V, Vizioli, LD, Pinsker, KL & Aldrich, TK 1993, 'Comparison of the Raja and the Abrams pleural biopsy needles in patients with pleural effusion', American Review of Respiratory Disease, vol. 147, no. 5, pp. 1291-1294.
Ogirala, R. G. ; Agarwal, V. ; Vizioli, L. D. ; Pinsker, K. L. ; Aldrich, T. K. / Comparison of the Raja and the Abrams pleural biopsy needles in patients with pleural effusion. In: American Review of Respiratory Disease. 1993 ; Vol. 147, No. 5. pp. 1291-1294.
@article{1afd9aa5ebd343b09b90dcee8dd15982,
title = "Comparison of the Raja and the Abrams pleural biopsy needles in patients with pleural effusion",
abstract = "In 31 patients with exudative pleural effusions, we compared the diagnostic yield of the Abrams pleural biopsy needle with that of a new instrument, the Raja pleural biopsy needle. Each patient was randomly biopsied with both needles, and a total of 153 pleural biopsies were done, 73 with the Abrams needle and 80 with the Raja needle. No complications resulted from biopsies with either needle. Etiologic diagnoses were possible in 38 (52{\%}) biopsies obtained using the Abrams needle, compared with 66 (82.5{\%}) for those using the Raja needle; the difference in proportions for the diagnostic yield was statistically significant (p < 0.01, two-tailed Fisher's exact test). There were no significant differences between the needles in obtaining etiologic diagnoses in any specific disease category. The difference between the mean size of the pleural specimens obtained with the two needles was also statistically significant (p < 0.001, Mann-Whitney U test). The Raja pleural biopsy needle is easy and safe to use, and despite its smaller external diameter yields a significantly larger pleural tissue sample and significantly increases the diagnostic yield of pleural biopsies compared with the Abrams pleural biopsy needle.",
author = "Ogirala, {R. G.} and V. Agarwal and Vizioli, {L. D.} and Pinsker, {K. L.} and Aldrich, {T. K.}",
year = "1993",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "147",
pages = "1291--1294",
journal = "American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine",
issn = "1073-449X",
publisher = "American Thoracic Society",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of the Raja and the Abrams pleural biopsy needles in patients with pleural effusion

AU - Ogirala, R. G.

AU - Agarwal, V.

AU - Vizioli, L. D.

AU - Pinsker, K. L.

AU - Aldrich, T. K.

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - In 31 patients with exudative pleural effusions, we compared the diagnostic yield of the Abrams pleural biopsy needle with that of a new instrument, the Raja pleural biopsy needle. Each patient was randomly biopsied with both needles, and a total of 153 pleural biopsies were done, 73 with the Abrams needle and 80 with the Raja needle. No complications resulted from biopsies with either needle. Etiologic diagnoses were possible in 38 (52%) biopsies obtained using the Abrams needle, compared with 66 (82.5%) for those using the Raja needle; the difference in proportions for the diagnostic yield was statistically significant (p < 0.01, two-tailed Fisher's exact test). There were no significant differences between the needles in obtaining etiologic diagnoses in any specific disease category. The difference between the mean size of the pleural specimens obtained with the two needles was also statistically significant (p < 0.001, Mann-Whitney U test). The Raja pleural biopsy needle is easy and safe to use, and despite its smaller external diameter yields a significantly larger pleural tissue sample and significantly increases the diagnostic yield of pleural biopsies compared with the Abrams pleural biopsy needle.

AB - In 31 patients with exudative pleural effusions, we compared the diagnostic yield of the Abrams pleural biopsy needle with that of a new instrument, the Raja pleural biopsy needle. Each patient was randomly biopsied with both needles, and a total of 153 pleural biopsies were done, 73 with the Abrams needle and 80 with the Raja needle. No complications resulted from biopsies with either needle. Etiologic diagnoses were possible in 38 (52%) biopsies obtained using the Abrams needle, compared with 66 (82.5%) for those using the Raja needle; the difference in proportions for the diagnostic yield was statistically significant (p < 0.01, two-tailed Fisher's exact test). There were no significant differences between the needles in obtaining etiologic diagnoses in any specific disease category. The difference between the mean size of the pleural specimens obtained with the two needles was also statistically significant (p < 0.001, Mann-Whitney U test). The Raja pleural biopsy needle is easy and safe to use, and despite its smaller external diameter yields a significantly larger pleural tissue sample and significantly increases the diagnostic yield of pleural biopsies compared with the Abrams pleural biopsy needle.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027156067&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027156067&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 147

SP - 1291

EP - 1294

JO - American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

JF - American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

SN - 1073-449X

IS - 5

ER -