Comparison of the hybrid capture tube test and PCR for detection of human papillomavirus DNA in cervical specimens

Judith U. Cope, Allan Hildesheim, Mark H. Schiffman, M. Michele Manos, Attila T. Lörincz, Robert D. Burk, Andrew G. Glass, Catherine Greer, Julie Buckland, Kay Helgesen, David R. Scott, Mark E. Sherman, Robert J. Kurman, Kai Li Liaw

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

84 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The strong association of human papillomavirus (HPV) and cervical cancer makes it important to study HPV detection methods that may play a role in cervical cancer screening. We compared two DNA methods that are commonly used for HPV research in the United States: the MY09/MY11 L1 consensus primer PCR- based test and the first-generation Hybrid Capture tube method (HCT). Laboratory assays by each method were performed with 596 cervicovaginal specimens collected from participants in a large cohort study conducted in Portland, Oreg. Included were 499 specimens from women whose cytology was normal and 97 specimens from women with squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs). The overall HPV DNA positivity for known types was 22.5% by PCR compared to 13.6% by HCT. When the analysis was restricted to the 14 HPV types detectable by both methods, the sensitivity of HCT, with PCR used as the standard for HPV status, was higher for specimens from women with concurrent SILs (81.0%) than for specimens from women with normal cytology (46.7%). Among specimens testing positive by both methods, 97.2% of the time the two methods agreed on whether specimens were positive for cancer- associated HPV types. Both of these HPV test methods provide information that supplements the information provided by the Pap smear. The PCR method has higher analytic sensitivity than HCT in detecting HPV, but HCT may be helpful in identifying women with concurrent SILs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2262-2265
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Clinical Microbiology
Volume35
Issue number9
StatePublished - Sep 1997

Fingerprint

Polymerase Chain Reaction
DNA
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Cell Biology
Papanicolaou Test
Early Detection of Cancer
Cohort Studies
Research
Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions of the Cervix
Neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Microbiology (medical)
  • Microbiology

Cite this

Cope, J. U., Hildesheim, A., Schiffman, M. H., Manos, M. M., Lörincz, A. T., Burk, R. D., ... Liaw, K. L. (1997). Comparison of the hybrid capture tube test and PCR for detection of human papillomavirus DNA in cervical specimens. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 35(9), 2262-2265.

Comparison of the hybrid capture tube test and PCR for detection of human papillomavirus DNA in cervical specimens. / Cope, Judith U.; Hildesheim, Allan; Schiffman, Mark H.; Manos, M. Michele; Lörincz, Attila T.; Burk, Robert D.; Glass, Andrew G.; Greer, Catherine; Buckland, Julie; Helgesen, Kay; Scott, David R.; Sherman, Mark E.; Kurman, Robert J.; Liaw, Kai Li.

In: Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Vol. 35, No. 9, 09.1997, p. 2262-2265.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cope, JU, Hildesheim, A, Schiffman, MH, Manos, MM, Lörincz, AT, Burk, RD, Glass, AG, Greer, C, Buckland, J, Helgesen, K, Scott, DR, Sherman, ME, Kurman, RJ & Liaw, KL 1997, 'Comparison of the hybrid capture tube test and PCR for detection of human papillomavirus DNA in cervical specimens', Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 2262-2265.
Cope, Judith U. ; Hildesheim, Allan ; Schiffman, Mark H. ; Manos, M. Michele ; Lörincz, Attila T. ; Burk, Robert D. ; Glass, Andrew G. ; Greer, Catherine ; Buckland, Julie ; Helgesen, Kay ; Scott, David R. ; Sherman, Mark E. ; Kurman, Robert J. ; Liaw, Kai Li. / Comparison of the hybrid capture tube test and PCR for detection of human papillomavirus DNA in cervical specimens. In: Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 1997 ; Vol. 35, No. 9. pp. 2262-2265.
@article{3881f792c818458e8adf47353bf72a4a,
title = "Comparison of the hybrid capture tube test and PCR for detection of human papillomavirus DNA in cervical specimens",
abstract = "The strong association of human papillomavirus (HPV) and cervical cancer makes it important to study HPV detection methods that may play a role in cervical cancer screening. We compared two DNA methods that are commonly used for HPV research in the United States: the MY09/MY11 L1 consensus primer PCR- based test and the first-generation Hybrid Capture tube method (HCT). Laboratory assays by each method were performed with 596 cervicovaginal specimens collected from participants in a large cohort study conducted in Portland, Oreg. Included were 499 specimens from women whose cytology was normal and 97 specimens from women with squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs). The overall HPV DNA positivity for known types was 22.5{\%} by PCR compared to 13.6{\%} by HCT. When the analysis was restricted to the 14 HPV types detectable by both methods, the sensitivity of HCT, with PCR used as the standard for HPV status, was higher for specimens from women with concurrent SILs (81.0{\%}) than for specimens from women with normal cytology (46.7{\%}). Among specimens testing positive by both methods, 97.2{\%} of the time the two methods agreed on whether specimens were positive for cancer- associated HPV types. Both of these HPV test methods provide information that supplements the information provided by the Pap smear. The PCR method has higher analytic sensitivity than HCT in detecting HPV, but HCT may be helpful in identifying women with concurrent SILs.",
author = "Cope, {Judith U.} and Allan Hildesheim and Schiffman, {Mark H.} and Manos, {M. Michele} and L{\"o}rincz, {Attila T.} and Burk, {Robert D.} and Glass, {Andrew G.} and Catherine Greer and Julie Buckland and Kay Helgesen and Scott, {David R.} and Sherman, {Mark E.} and Kurman, {Robert J.} and Liaw, {Kai Li}",
year = "1997",
month = "9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "2262--2265",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Microbiology",
issn = "0095-1137",
publisher = "American Society for Microbiology",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of the hybrid capture tube test and PCR for detection of human papillomavirus DNA in cervical specimens

AU - Cope, Judith U.

AU - Hildesheim, Allan

AU - Schiffman, Mark H.

AU - Manos, M. Michele

AU - Lörincz, Attila T.

AU - Burk, Robert D.

AU - Glass, Andrew G.

AU - Greer, Catherine

AU - Buckland, Julie

AU - Helgesen, Kay

AU - Scott, David R.

AU - Sherman, Mark E.

AU - Kurman, Robert J.

AU - Liaw, Kai Li

PY - 1997/9

Y1 - 1997/9

N2 - The strong association of human papillomavirus (HPV) and cervical cancer makes it important to study HPV detection methods that may play a role in cervical cancer screening. We compared two DNA methods that are commonly used for HPV research in the United States: the MY09/MY11 L1 consensus primer PCR- based test and the first-generation Hybrid Capture tube method (HCT). Laboratory assays by each method were performed with 596 cervicovaginal specimens collected from participants in a large cohort study conducted in Portland, Oreg. Included were 499 specimens from women whose cytology was normal and 97 specimens from women with squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs). The overall HPV DNA positivity for known types was 22.5% by PCR compared to 13.6% by HCT. When the analysis was restricted to the 14 HPV types detectable by both methods, the sensitivity of HCT, with PCR used as the standard for HPV status, was higher for specimens from women with concurrent SILs (81.0%) than for specimens from women with normal cytology (46.7%). Among specimens testing positive by both methods, 97.2% of the time the two methods agreed on whether specimens were positive for cancer- associated HPV types. Both of these HPV test methods provide information that supplements the information provided by the Pap smear. The PCR method has higher analytic sensitivity than HCT in detecting HPV, but HCT may be helpful in identifying women with concurrent SILs.

AB - The strong association of human papillomavirus (HPV) and cervical cancer makes it important to study HPV detection methods that may play a role in cervical cancer screening. We compared two DNA methods that are commonly used for HPV research in the United States: the MY09/MY11 L1 consensus primer PCR- based test and the first-generation Hybrid Capture tube method (HCT). Laboratory assays by each method were performed with 596 cervicovaginal specimens collected from participants in a large cohort study conducted in Portland, Oreg. Included were 499 specimens from women whose cytology was normal and 97 specimens from women with squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs). The overall HPV DNA positivity for known types was 22.5% by PCR compared to 13.6% by HCT. When the analysis was restricted to the 14 HPV types detectable by both methods, the sensitivity of HCT, with PCR used as the standard for HPV status, was higher for specimens from women with concurrent SILs (81.0%) than for specimens from women with normal cytology (46.7%). Among specimens testing positive by both methods, 97.2% of the time the two methods agreed on whether specimens were positive for cancer- associated HPV types. Both of these HPV test methods provide information that supplements the information provided by the Pap smear. The PCR method has higher analytic sensitivity than HCT in detecting HPV, but HCT may be helpful in identifying women with concurrent SILs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030793675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030793675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9276398

AN - SCOPUS:0030793675

VL - 35

SP - 2262

EP - 2265

JO - Journal of Clinical Microbiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Microbiology

SN - 0095-1137

IS - 9

ER -