Comparison of new Doppler echocardiographic methods to differentiate constrictive pericardial heart disease and restrictive cardiomyopathy

Navin Rajagopalan, Mario J. Garcia, Leonardo Rodriguez, R. Daniel Murray, Carolyn Apperson-Hansen, Marie Stugaard, James D. Thomas, Allan L. Klein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

161 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study assesses how the newer modalities of tissue Doppler echocardiography and color M-mode flow propagation compare with respiratory variation of Doppler flow in distinguishing between constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy. We studied 30 patients referred for further evaluation of diastolic function who had a diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis or restrictive cardiomyopathy established by diagnostic tests, including clinical assessment, magnetic resonance imaging, cardiac catheterization, endomyocardial biopsy, and surgical findings. Nineteen patients had constrictive pericarditis and 11 had restrictive cardiomyopathy. We performed 2-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography combined with pulsed-wave Doppler of the pulmonary veins and mitral inflow with respiratory monitoring, tissue Doppler echocardiography of the lateral mitral annulus, and color M-mode flow propagation of left ventricular filling. Respiratory variation of the mitral inflow peak early (peak E) velocity of ≥10% predicted constrictive pericarditis with 84% sensitivity and 91% specificity and variation in the pulmonary venous peak diastolic (peak D) flow velocity of ≥18% distinguished constriction with 79% sensitivity and 91% specificity. Using tissue Doppler echocardiography, a peak early velocity of longitudinal expansion (peak Ea) of ≥8.0 cm/s differentiated patients with constriction from restriction with 89% sensitivity and 100% specificity. A slope of ≥100 cm/s for the first aliasing contour in color M-mode flow propagation predicted patients with constriction with 74% sensitivity and 91% specificity. Thus, the newer methods of tissue Doppler echocardiography and color M-mode flow propagation are equivalent and complimentary with Doppler respiratory variation in distinguishing between constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy. The additive role of the new methods needs to be established in difficult cases of constrictive pericarditis where respiratory variation may be absent or decreased.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)86-94
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Cardiology
Volume87
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Constrictive Pericarditis
Heart Diseases
Constriction
Doppler Color Echocardiography
Sensitivity and Specificity
Doppler Echocardiography
Color
Pulmonary Veins
Transesophageal Echocardiography
Cardiac Catheterization
Routine Diagnostic Tests
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Biopsy
Lung

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Comparison of new Doppler echocardiographic methods to differentiate constrictive pericardial heart disease and restrictive cardiomyopathy. / Rajagopalan, Navin; Garcia, Mario J.; Rodriguez, Leonardo; Murray, R. Daniel; Apperson-Hansen, Carolyn; Stugaard, Marie; Thomas, James D.; Klein, Allan L.

In: American Journal of Cardiology, Vol. 87, No. 1, 01.01.2001, p. 86-94.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rajagopalan, Navin ; Garcia, Mario J. ; Rodriguez, Leonardo ; Murray, R. Daniel ; Apperson-Hansen, Carolyn ; Stugaard, Marie ; Thomas, James D. ; Klein, Allan L. / Comparison of new Doppler echocardiographic methods to differentiate constrictive pericardial heart disease and restrictive cardiomyopathy. In: American Journal of Cardiology. 2001 ; Vol. 87, No. 1. pp. 86-94.
@article{75528831eb274b54819d6a2472a3f777,
title = "Comparison of new Doppler echocardiographic methods to differentiate constrictive pericardial heart disease and restrictive cardiomyopathy",
abstract = "This study assesses how the newer modalities of tissue Doppler echocardiography and color M-mode flow propagation compare with respiratory variation of Doppler flow in distinguishing between constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy. We studied 30 patients referred for further evaluation of diastolic function who had a diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis or restrictive cardiomyopathy established by diagnostic tests, including clinical assessment, magnetic resonance imaging, cardiac catheterization, endomyocardial biopsy, and surgical findings. Nineteen patients had constrictive pericarditis and 11 had restrictive cardiomyopathy. We performed 2-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography combined with pulsed-wave Doppler of the pulmonary veins and mitral inflow with respiratory monitoring, tissue Doppler echocardiography of the lateral mitral annulus, and color M-mode flow propagation of left ventricular filling. Respiratory variation of the mitral inflow peak early (peak E) velocity of ≥10{\%} predicted constrictive pericarditis with 84{\%} sensitivity and 91{\%} specificity and variation in the pulmonary venous peak diastolic (peak D) flow velocity of ≥18{\%} distinguished constriction with 79{\%} sensitivity and 91{\%} specificity. Using tissue Doppler echocardiography, a peak early velocity of longitudinal expansion (peak Ea) of ≥8.0 cm/s differentiated patients with constriction from restriction with 89{\%} sensitivity and 100{\%} specificity. A slope of ≥100 cm/s for the first aliasing contour in color M-mode flow propagation predicted patients with constriction with 74{\%} sensitivity and 91{\%} specificity. Thus, the newer methods of tissue Doppler echocardiography and color M-mode flow propagation are equivalent and complimentary with Doppler respiratory variation in distinguishing between constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy. The additive role of the new methods needs to be established in difficult cases of constrictive pericarditis where respiratory variation may be absent or decreased.",
author = "Navin Rajagopalan and Garcia, {Mario J.} and Leonardo Rodriguez and Murray, {R. Daniel} and Carolyn Apperson-Hansen and Marie Stugaard and Thomas, {James D.} and Klein, {Allan L.}",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0002-9149(00)01278-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "87",
pages = "86--94",
journal = "American Journal of Cardiology",
issn = "0002-9149",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of new Doppler echocardiographic methods to differentiate constrictive pericardial heart disease and restrictive cardiomyopathy

AU - Rajagopalan, Navin

AU - Garcia, Mario J.

AU - Rodriguez, Leonardo

AU - Murray, R. Daniel

AU - Apperson-Hansen, Carolyn

AU - Stugaard, Marie

AU - Thomas, James D.

AU - Klein, Allan L.

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - This study assesses how the newer modalities of tissue Doppler echocardiography and color M-mode flow propagation compare with respiratory variation of Doppler flow in distinguishing between constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy. We studied 30 patients referred for further evaluation of diastolic function who had a diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis or restrictive cardiomyopathy established by diagnostic tests, including clinical assessment, magnetic resonance imaging, cardiac catheterization, endomyocardial biopsy, and surgical findings. Nineteen patients had constrictive pericarditis and 11 had restrictive cardiomyopathy. We performed 2-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography combined with pulsed-wave Doppler of the pulmonary veins and mitral inflow with respiratory monitoring, tissue Doppler echocardiography of the lateral mitral annulus, and color M-mode flow propagation of left ventricular filling. Respiratory variation of the mitral inflow peak early (peak E) velocity of ≥10% predicted constrictive pericarditis with 84% sensitivity and 91% specificity and variation in the pulmonary venous peak diastolic (peak D) flow velocity of ≥18% distinguished constriction with 79% sensitivity and 91% specificity. Using tissue Doppler echocardiography, a peak early velocity of longitudinal expansion (peak Ea) of ≥8.0 cm/s differentiated patients with constriction from restriction with 89% sensitivity and 100% specificity. A slope of ≥100 cm/s for the first aliasing contour in color M-mode flow propagation predicted patients with constriction with 74% sensitivity and 91% specificity. Thus, the newer methods of tissue Doppler echocardiography and color M-mode flow propagation are equivalent and complimentary with Doppler respiratory variation in distinguishing between constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy. The additive role of the new methods needs to be established in difficult cases of constrictive pericarditis where respiratory variation may be absent or decreased.

AB - This study assesses how the newer modalities of tissue Doppler echocardiography and color M-mode flow propagation compare with respiratory variation of Doppler flow in distinguishing between constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy. We studied 30 patients referred for further evaluation of diastolic function who had a diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis or restrictive cardiomyopathy established by diagnostic tests, including clinical assessment, magnetic resonance imaging, cardiac catheterization, endomyocardial biopsy, and surgical findings. Nineteen patients had constrictive pericarditis and 11 had restrictive cardiomyopathy. We performed 2-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography combined with pulsed-wave Doppler of the pulmonary veins and mitral inflow with respiratory monitoring, tissue Doppler echocardiography of the lateral mitral annulus, and color M-mode flow propagation of left ventricular filling. Respiratory variation of the mitral inflow peak early (peak E) velocity of ≥10% predicted constrictive pericarditis with 84% sensitivity and 91% specificity and variation in the pulmonary venous peak diastolic (peak D) flow velocity of ≥18% distinguished constriction with 79% sensitivity and 91% specificity. Using tissue Doppler echocardiography, a peak early velocity of longitudinal expansion (peak Ea) of ≥8.0 cm/s differentiated patients with constriction from restriction with 89% sensitivity and 100% specificity. A slope of ≥100 cm/s for the first aliasing contour in color M-mode flow propagation predicted patients with constriction with 74% sensitivity and 91% specificity. Thus, the newer methods of tissue Doppler echocardiography and color M-mode flow propagation are equivalent and complimentary with Doppler respiratory variation in distinguishing between constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy. The additive role of the new methods needs to be established in difficult cases of constrictive pericarditis where respiratory variation may be absent or decreased.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035184494&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035184494&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0002-9149(00)01278-9

DO - 10.1016/S0002-9149(00)01278-9

M3 - Article

C2 - 11137840

AN - SCOPUS:0035184494

VL - 87

SP - 86

EP - 94

JO - American Journal of Cardiology

JF - American Journal of Cardiology

SN - 0002-9149

IS - 1

ER -