Comparison of duplex ultrasonography and ascending contrast venography in the diagnosis of venous thrombosis

C. M. Montefusco-von Kleist, C. Bakal, Seymour Sprayregen, B. A. Rhodes, F. J. Veith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The application of duplex ultrasonography to the diagnosis of venous thrombosis requires validation by comparison of the duplex findings with the results of ascending contrast venography. In this study, 2534 veins were examined by both methods with contrast venography results serving as the standard for comparison. In this setting, duplex ultrasonography proved to be 100% sensitive and 99% specific for venous thrombosis. Duplex ultrasonography is as reliable as venography in the diagnosis of venous thrombosis and has no associated risks or known complication. In addition, duplex ultrasonography provides information regarding pathologic anatomy that is comparable to the detail provided by high-quality venography. The authors conclude that duplex ultrasonography should be the diagnostic method of choice for evaluating patients with suspected venous thrombosis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)169-175
Number of pages7
JournalAngiology
Volume44
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1993

Fingerprint

Phlebography
Venous Thrombosis
Ultrasonography
Veins
Anatomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Montefusco-von Kleist, C. M., Bakal, C., Sprayregen, S., Rhodes, B. A., & Veith, F. J. (1993). Comparison of duplex ultrasonography and ascending contrast venography in the diagnosis of venous thrombosis. Angiology, 44(3), 169-175.

Comparison of duplex ultrasonography and ascending contrast venography in the diagnosis of venous thrombosis. / Montefusco-von Kleist, C. M.; Bakal, C.; Sprayregen, Seymour; Rhodes, B. A.; Veith, F. J.

In: Angiology, Vol. 44, No. 3, 1993, p. 169-175.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Montefusco-von Kleist, CM, Bakal, C, Sprayregen, S, Rhodes, BA & Veith, FJ 1993, 'Comparison of duplex ultrasonography and ascending contrast venography in the diagnosis of venous thrombosis', Angiology, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 169-175.
Montefusco-von Kleist, C. M. ; Bakal, C. ; Sprayregen, Seymour ; Rhodes, B. A. ; Veith, F. J. / Comparison of duplex ultrasonography and ascending contrast venography in the diagnosis of venous thrombosis. In: Angiology. 1993 ; Vol. 44, No. 3. pp. 169-175.
@article{627630e718b3448a80a0286198686150,
title = "Comparison of duplex ultrasonography and ascending contrast venography in the diagnosis of venous thrombosis",
abstract = "The application of duplex ultrasonography to the diagnosis of venous thrombosis requires validation by comparison of the duplex findings with the results of ascending contrast venography. In this study, 2534 veins were examined by both methods with contrast venography results serving as the standard for comparison. In this setting, duplex ultrasonography proved to be 100{\%} sensitive and 99{\%} specific for venous thrombosis. Duplex ultrasonography is as reliable as venography in the diagnosis of venous thrombosis and has no associated risks or known complication. In addition, duplex ultrasonography provides information regarding pathologic anatomy that is comparable to the detail provided by high-quality venography. The authors conclude that duplex ultrasonography should be the diagnostic method of choice for evaluating patients with suspected venous thrombosis.",
author = "{Montefusco-von Kleist}, {C. M.} and C. Bakal and Seymour Sprayregen and Rhodes, {B. A.} and Veith, {F. J.}",
year = "1993",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "169--175",
journal = "Angiology",
issn = "0003-3197",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of duplex ultrasonography and ascending contrast venography in the diagnosis of venous thrombosis

AU - Montefusco-von Kleist, C. M.

AU - Bakal, C.

AU - Sprayregen, Seymour

AU - Rhodes, B. A.

AU - Veith, F. J.

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - The application of duplex ultrasonography to the diagnosis of venous thrombosis requires validation by comparison of the duplex findings with the results of ascending contrast venography. In this study, 2534 veins were examined by both methods with contrast venography results serving as the standard for comparison. In this setting, duplex ultrasonography proved to be 100% sensitive and 99% specific for venous thrombosis. Duplex ultrasonography is as reliable as venography in the diagnosis of venous thrombosis and has no associated risks or known complication. In addition, duplex ultrasonography provides information regarding pathologic anatomy that is comparable to the detail provided by high-quality venography. The authors conclude that duplex ultrasonography should be the diagnostic method of choice for evaluating patients with suspected venous thrombosis.

AB - The application of duplex ultrasonography to the diagnosis of venous thrombosis requires validation by comparison of the duplex findings with the results of ascending contrast venography. In this study, 2534 veins were examined by both methods with contrast venography results serving as the standard for comparison. In this setting, duplex ultrasonography proved to be 100% sensitive and 99% specific for venous thrombosis. Duplex ultrasonography is as reliable as venography in the diagnosis of venous thrombosis and has no associated risks or known complication. In addition, duplex ultrasonography provides information regarding pathologic anatomy that is comparable to the detail provided by high-quality venography. The authors conclude that duplex ultrasonography should be the diagnostic method of choice for evaluating patients with suspected venous thrombosis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027400106&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027400106&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 169

EP - 175

JO - Angiology

JF - Angiology

SN - 0003-3197

IS - 3

ER -