Comparison of depth of necrosis achieved by CO2- and N2O-cryotherapy

J. Mariategui, C. Santos, L. Taxa, J. Jeronimo, Philip E. Castle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To compare the depth of necrosis achieved using CO2- and N2O-cryotherapy. Method: We treated 20 women with CO2-cryotherapy and 20 with N2O-cryotherapy 24 h prior to undergoing total hysterectomy for reasons unrelated to cervical cancer. Depth of necrosis in the ectocervix was measured on surgically removed tissue. Results: The mean depth of necrosis for the anterior lip achieved by N2O-cryotherapy was 5.3 mm compared with 3.4 mm by CO2-cryotherapy (P < 0.001). We found similar results for the posterior lip (5.0 vs 3.1 mm; P < 0.001). N2O-cryotherapy was more likely than CO2-cryotherapy to achieve a depth of necrosis of ≥ 4.8 mm for the anterior lip (75% vs 15%; P < 0.001) and posterior lip (60% vs 5%; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Our study showed that CO2-cryotherapy may not achieve the depth of necrosis necessary to completely destroy cervical precancer and therefore may be less robust than N2O-cryotherapy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)24-26
Number of pages3
JournalInternational Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Volume100
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cryotherapy
Necrosis
Lip
Hysterectomy
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Cervical cancer
  • Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3)
  • Cervical precancer
  • CO-cryotherapy
  • NO-cryotherapy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Comparison of depth of necrosis achieved by CO2- and N2O-cryotherapy. / Mariategui, J.; Santos, C.; Taxa, L.; Jeronimo, J.; Castle, Philip E.

In: International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Vol. 100, No. 1, 01.2008, p. 24-26.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mariategui, J. ; Santos, C. ; Taxa, L. ; Jeronimo, J. ; Castle, Philip E. / Comparison of depth of necrosis achieved by CO2- and N2O-cryotherapy. In: International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2008 ; Vol. 100, No. 1. pp. 24-26.
@article{4f16acb31e07495a911acece652cefd4,
title = "Comparison of depth of necrosis achieved by CO2- and N2O-cryotherapy",
abstract = "Objective: To compare the depth of necrosis achieved using CO2- and N2O-cryotherapy. Method: We treated 20 women with CO2-cryotherapy and 20 with N2O-cryotherapy 24 h prior to undergoing total hysterectomy for reasons unrelated to cervical cancer. Depth of necrosis in the ectocervix was measured on surgically removed tissue. Results: The mean depth of necrosis for the anterior lip achieved by N2O-cryotherapy was 5.3 mm compared with 3.4 mm by CO2-cryotherapy (P < 0.001). We found similar results for the posterior lip (5.0 vs 3.1 mm; P < 0.001). N2O-cryotherapy was more likely than CO2-cryotherapy to achieve a depth of necrosis of ≥ 4.8 mm for the anterior lip (75{\%} vs 15{\%}; P < 0.001) and posterior lip (60{\%} vs 5{\%}; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Our study showed that CO2-cryotherapy may not achieve the depth of necrosis necessary to completely destroy cervical precancer and therefore may be less robust than N2O-cryotherapy.",
keywords = "Cervical cancer, Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3), Cervical precancer, CO-cryotherapy, NO-cryotherapy",
author = "J. Mariategui and C. Santos and L. Taxa and J. Jeronimo and Castle, {Philip E.}",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.07.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "100",
pages = "24--26",
journal = "International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics",
issn = "0020-7292",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of depth of necrosis achieved by CO2- and N2O-cryotherapy

AU - Mariategui, J.

AU - Santos, C.

AU - Taxa, L.

AU - Jeronimo, J.

AU - Castle, Philip E.

PY - 2008/1

Y1 - 2008/1

N2 - Objective: To compare the depth of necrosis achieved using CO2- and N2O-cryotherapy. Method: We treated 20 women with CO2-cryotherapy and 20 with N2O-cryotherapy 24 h prior to undergoing total hysterectomy for reasons unrelated to cervical cancer. Depth of necrosis in the ectocervix was measured on surgically removed tissue. Results: The mean depth of necrosis for the anterior lip achieved by N2O-cryotherapy was 5.3 mm compared with 3.4 mm by CO2-cryotherapy (P < 0.001). We found similar results for the posterior lip (5.0 vs 3.1 mm; P < 0.001). N2O-cryotherapy was more likely than CO2-cryotherapy to achieve a depth of necrosis of ≥ 4.8 mm for the anterior lip (75% vs 15%; P < 0.001) and posterior lip (60% vs 5%; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Our study showed that CO2-cryotherapy may not achieve the depth of necrosis necessary to completely destroy cervical precancer and therefore may be less robust than N2O-cryotherapy.

AB - Objective: To compare the depth of necrosis achieved using CO2- and N2O-cryotherapy. Method: We treated 20 women with CO2-cryotherapy and 20 with N2O-cryotherapy 24 h prior to undergoing total hysterectomy for reasons unrelated to cervical cancer. Depth of necrosis in the ectocervix was measured on surgically removed tissue. Results: The mean depth of necrosis for the anterior lip achieved by N2O-cryotherapy was 5.3 mm compared with 3.4 mm by CO2-cryotherapy (P < 0.001). We found similar results for the posterior lip (5.0 vs 3.1 mm; P < 0.001). N2O-cryotherapy was more likely than CO2-cryotherapy to achieve a depth of necrosis of ≥ 4.8 mm for the anterior lip (75% vs 15%; P < 0.001) and posterior lip (60% vs 5%; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Our study showed that CO2-cryotherapy may not achieve the depth of necrosis necessary to completely destroy cervical precancer and therefore may be less robust than N2O-cryotherapy.

KW - Cervical cancer

KW - Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3)

KW - Cervical precancer

KW - CO-cryotherapy

KW - NO-cryotherapy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36749100978&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36749100978&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.07.009

DO - 10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.07.009

M3 - Article

C2 - 17897647

AN - SCOPUS:36749100978

VL - 100

SP - 24

EP - 26

JO - International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics

JF - International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics

SN - 0020-7292

IS - 1

ER -