Comparing mechanical fetal response during descent, crowning, and restitution among deliveries with and without shoulder dystocia

Robert H. Allen, Stephanie L. Cha, Lindsay M. Kranker, Tara L. Johnson, Edith D. Gurewitsch Allen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Previous computer simulations of shoulder dystocia (SD) explored the effect of SD itself on the mechanical response of the fetus. Our objective was to perform a mechanical simulation study to explore the variations in fetal response during routine, unilateral SD (USD), and bilateral SD (BSD) deliveries. Study Design: Using a biofidelic birthing simulator, we performed 30 experiments mimicking passage of the fetus through the pelvis. For routine deliveries, we engaged the fetal head and allowed it to progress through cardinal movements using typical uterine contraction forces. Deliveries stopped when the head restituted externally to left occiput anterior (LOA) position. The identical procedure was repeated for USD deliveries, except we obstructed the anterior shoulder on the symphysis pubis; for BSD, the posterior shoulder was also impacted on the sacral promontory. For each delivery we continuously measured head rotation, brachial plexus (BP) stretch and neck extension, selecting peak values for analysis. Maximum rotation, BP stretch, and extension were compared among groups using analysis of variance, with P < .05 considered significant. Results: Among routine, USD, and BSD deliveries, mean peak BP stretch varied between 10% and 21%, rotation varied between 70° and 77°, and extension varied between 6% and 18%. Greatest stretch occurred in the posterior BP during descent in non-SD deliveries, whereas anterior BP stretch, rotation, and extension were similar among the 3 types of deliveries. Conclusion: Quantifiable mechanical response occurs in routine and SD deliveries. Posterior BP stretch is significantly longer for routine deliveries than either USD or BSD deliveries. By itself, shoulder dystocia does not pose additional risk of brachial plexus stretch over routine deliveries.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume196
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dystocia
Brachial Plexus
Head
Fetus
Pubic Bone
Uterine Contraction
Pelvis
Computer Simulation
Analysis of Variance
Neck

Keywords

  • birth trauma
  • brachial plexus stretch
  • injury prevention
  • laboratory model
  • routine delivery
  • shoulder dystocia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Comparing mechanical fetal response during descent, crowning, and restitution among deliveries with and without shoulder dystocia. / Allen, Robert H.; Cha, Stephanie L.; Kranker, Lindsay M.; Johnson, Tara L.; Gurewitsch Allen, Edith D.

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 196, No. 6, 01.06.2007.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d7dc135518f04e6080da6330d2aadd95,
title = "Comparing mechanical fetal response during descent, crowning, and restitution among deliveries with and without shoulder dystocia",
abstract = "Objective: Previous computer simulations of shoulder dystocia (SD) explored the effect of SD itself on the mechanical response of the fetus. Our objective was to perform a mechanical simulation study to explore the variations in fetal response during routine, unilateral SD (USD), and bilateral SD (BSD) deliveries. Study Design: Using a biofidelic birthing simulator, we performed 30 experiments mimicking passage of the fetus through the pelvis. For routine deliveries, we engaged the fetal head and allowed it to progress through cardinal movements using typical uterine contraction forces. Deliveries stopped when the head restituted externally to left occiput anterior (LOA) position. The identical procedure was repeated for USD deliveries, except we obstructed the anterior shoulder on the symphysis pubis; for BSD, the posterior shoulder was also impacted on the sacral promontory. For each delivery we continuously measured head rotation, brachial plexus (BP) stretch and neck extension, selecting peak values for analysis. Maximum rotation, BP stretch, and extension were compared among groups using analysis of variance, with P < .05 considered significant. Results: Among routine, USD, and BSD deliveries, mean peak BP stretch varied between 10{\%} and 21{\%}, rotation varied between 70° and 77°, and extension varied between 6{\%} and 18{\%}. Greatest stretch occurred in the posterior BP during descent in non-SD deliveries, whereas anterior BP stretch, rotation, and extension were similar among the 3 types of deliveries. Conclusion: Quantifiable mechanical response occurs in routine and SD deliveries. Posterior BP stretch is significantly longer for routine deliveries than either USD or BSD deliveries. By itself, shoulder dystocia does not pose additional risk of brachial plexus stretch over routine deliveries.",
keywords = "birth trauma, brachial plexus stretch, injury prevention, laboratory model, routine delivery, shoulder dystocia",
author = "Allen, {Robert H.} and Cha, {Stephanie L.} and Kranker, {Lindsay M.} and Johnson, {Tara L.} and {Gurewitsch Allen}, {Edith D.}",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajog.2006.12.034",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "196",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing mechanical fetal response during descent, crowning, and restitution among deliveries with and without shoulder dystocia

AU - Allen, Robert H.

AU - Cha, Stephanie L.

AU - Kranker, Lindsay M.

AU - Johnson, Tara L.

AU - Gurewitsch Allen, Edith D.

PY - 2007/6/1

Y1 - 2007/6/1

N2 - Objective: Previous computer simulations of shoulder dystocia (SD) explored the effect of SD itself on the mechanical response of the fetus. Our objective was to perform a mechanical simulation study to explore the variations in fetal response during routine, unilateral SD (USD), and bilateral SD (BSD) deliveries. Study Design: Using a biofidelic birthing simulator, we performed 30 experiments mimicking passage of the fetus through the pelvis. For routine deliveries, we engaged the fetal head and allowed it to progress through cardinal movements using typical uterine contraction forces. Deliveries stopped when the head restituted externally to left occiput anterior (LOA) position. The identical procedure was repeated for USD deliveries, except we obstructed the anterior shoulder on the symphysis pubis; for BSD, the posterior shoulder was also impacted on the sacral promontory. For each delivery we continuously measured head rotation, brachial plexus (BP) stretch and neck extension, selecting peak values for analysis. Maximum rotation, BP stretch, and extension were compared among groups using analysis of variance, with P < .05 considered significant. Results: Among routine, USD, and BSD deliveries, mean peak BP stretch varied between 10% and 21%, rotation varied between 70° and 77°, and extension varied between 6% and 18%. Greatest stretch occurred in the posterior BP during descent in non-SD deliveries, whereas anterior BP stretch, rotation, and extension were similar among the 3 types of deliveries. Conclusion: Quantifiable mechanical response occurs in routine and SD deliveries. Posterior BP stretch is significantly longer for routine deliveries than either USD or BSD deliveries. By itself, shoulder dystocia does not pose additional risk of brachial plexus stretch over routine deliveries.

AB - Objective: Previous computer simulations of shoulder dystocia (SD) explored the effect of SD itself on the mechanical response of the fetus. Our objective was to perform a mechanical simulation study to explore the variations in fetal response during routine, unilateral SD (USD), and bilateral SD (BSD) deliveries. Study Design: Using a biofidelic birthing simulator, we performed 30 experiments mimicking passage of the fetus through the pelvis. For routine deliveries, we engaged the fetal head and allowed it to progress through cardinal movements using typical uterine contraction forces. Deliveries stopped when the head restituted externally to left occiput anterior (LOA) position. The identical procedure was repeated for USD deliveries, except we obstructed the anterior shoulder on the symphysis pubis; for BSD, the posterior shoulder was also impacted on the sacral promontory. For each delivery we continuously measured head rotation, brachial plexus (BP) stretch and neck extension, selecting peak values for analysis. Maximum rotation, BP stretch, and extension were compared among groups using analysis of variance, with P < .05 considered significant. Results: Among routine, USD, and BSD deliveries, mean peak BP stretch varied between 10% and 21%, rotation varied between 70° and 77°, and extension varied between 6% and 18%. Greatest stretch occurred in the posterior BP during descent in non-SD deliveries, whereas anterior BP stretch, rotation, and extension were similar among the 3 types of deliveries. Conclusion: Quantifiable mechanical response occurs in routine and SD deliveries. Posterior BP stretch is significantly longer for routine deliveries than either USD or BSD deliveries. By itself, shoulder dystocia does not pose additional risk of brachial plexus stretch over routine deliveries.

KW - birth trauma

KW - brachial plexus stretch

KW - injury prevention

KW - laboratory model

KW - routine delivery

KW - shoulder dystocia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34248684221&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34248684221&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.12.034

DO - 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.12.034

M3 - Article

VL - 196

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 6

ER -