Comparing different definitions of chronic conditions in a national data set

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

59 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. - To compare the application of 4 different definitions of chronic conditions and disabilities in children using a large national database. Methods. - The study used data on children 0-17 years of age from the 1994 and 1995 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) Core Interview and Disability Supplement. We selected items to create algorithms that operationalized 4 extant definitions and compared the proportions of children identified by each. For each definition we conducted bivariate and logistic regression analyses of age and sociodemographic and health-related characteristics potentially related to presence of disability. We then compared the results across definitions to determine if they were equally likely to identify children across a full range of sociodemographic variables, ages, and health-related characteristics. We also examined the level of agreement among definitions and determined the degree to which they identified the same or different children. Results. - Using a single data set, the 4 operational definitions identified somewhat different proportions of children as having chronic conditions or disability overall (the range was 13.7%-17%). However, the ways in which the definitions identified children along a spectrum of variables did not differ substantially across the definitions. The percent agreement in identification between any two individual definitions was ≥95%. In general, a higher proportion of children were identified among males, whites, those in older age groups, and among those whose parents had lower levels of education and those who were living below the poverty level. Although the same set of variables identified children with conditions who fit all 4 definitions compared with children who met the criteria for 1 to 3 definitions, higher rather than lower parent education was associated with agreement across all definitions. Conclusions. - Little has been known about the comparability of different definitions for identifying children with chronic conditions, special health care needs, and disability. Our findings suggest substantial overlap in the numbers and characteristics of the children that several different conceptual definitions identify. It remains unclear whether subgroups with higher or lower proportions of children with chronic disorders represent a substantive finding or whether they result from methodological problems shared by the ways in which the definitions are operationalized.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)63-70
Number of pages8
JournalAmbulatory Pediatrics
Volume2
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Datasets
Interviews
Education
Health
Poverty
Health Surveys
Age Groups
Parents
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis
Databases
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • Children with special health care needs
  • Chronic conditions
  • Definitions
  • Disability
  • Population survey

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Comparing different definitions of chronic conditions in a national data set. / Stein, Ruth E. K.; Silver, Ellen J.

In: Ambulatory Pediatrics, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2002, p. 63-70.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0455aee5085643e1a8cbe9facbecb396,
title = "Comparing different definitions of chronic conditions in a national data set",
abstract = "Objectives. - To compare the application of 4 different definitions of chronic conditions and disabilities in children using a large national database. Methods. - The study used data on children 0-17 years of age from the 1994 and 1995 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) Core Interview and Disability Supplement. We selected items to create algorithms that operationalized 4 extant definitions and compared the proportions of children identified by each. For each definition we conducted bivariate and logistic regression analyses of age and sociodemographic and health-related characteristics potentially related to presence of disability. We then compared the results across definitions to determine if they were equally likely to identify children across a full range of sociodemographic variables, ages, and health-related characteristics. We also examined the level of agreement among definitions and determined the degree to which they identified the same or different children. Results. - Using a single data set, the 4 operational definitions identified somewhat different proportions of children as having chronic conditions or disability overall (the range was 13.7{\%}-17{\%}). However, the ways in which the definitions identified children along a spectrum of variables did not differ substantially across the definitions. The percent agreement in identification between any two individual definitions was ≥95{\%}. In general, a higher proportion of children were identified among males, whites, those in older age groups, and among those whose parents had lower levels of education and those who were living below the poverty level. Although the same set of variables identified children with conditions who fit all 4 definitions compared with children who met the criteria for 1 to 3 definitions, higher rather than lower parent education was associated with agreement across all definitions. Conclusions. - Little has been known about the comparability of different definitions for identifying children with chronic conditions, special health care needs, and disability. Our findings suggest substantial overlap in the numbers and characteristics of the children that several different conceptual definitions identify. It remains unclear whether subgroups with higher or lower proportions of children with chronic disorders represent a substantive finding or whether they result from methodological problems shared by the ways in which the definitions are operationalized.",
keywords = "Children with special health care needs, Chronic conditions, Definitions, Disability, Population survey",
author = "Stein, {Ruth E. K.} and Silver, {Ellen J.}",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1367/1539-4409(2002)002<0063:CDDOCC>2.0.CO;2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "63--70",
journal = "Academic Pediatrics",
issn = "1876-2859",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing different definitions of chronic conditions in a national data set

AU - Stein, Ruth E. K.

AU - Silver, Ellen J.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Objectives. - To compare the application of 4 different definitions of chronic conditions and disabilities in children using a large national database. Methods. - The study used data on children 0-17 years of age from the 1994 and 1995 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) Core Interview and Disability Supplement. We selected items to create algorithms that operationalized 4 extant definitions and compared the proportions of children identified by each. For each definition we conducted bivariate and logistic regression analyses of age and sociodemographic and health-related characteristics potentially related to presence of disability. We then compared the results across definitions to determine if they were equally likely to identify children across a full range of sociodemographic variables, ages, and health-related characteristics. We also examined the level of agreement among definitions and determined the degree to which they identified the same or different children. Results. - Using a single data set, the 4 operational definitions identified somewhat different proportions of children as having chronic conditions or disability overall (the range was 13.7%-17%). However, the ways in which the definitions identified children along a spectrum of variables did not differ substantially across the definitions. The percent agreement in identification between any two individual definitions was ≥95%. In general, a higher proportion of children were identified among males, whites, those in older age groups, and among those whose parents had lower levels of education and those who were living below the poverty level. Although the same set of variables identified children with conditions who fit all 4 definitions compared with children who met the criteria for 1 to 3 definitions, higher rather than lower parent education was associated with agreement across all definitions. Conclusions. - Little has been known about the comparability of different definitions for identifying children with chronic conditions, special health care needs, and disability. Our findings suggest substantial overlap in the numbers and characteristics of the children that several different conceptual definitions identify. It remains unclear whether subgroups with higher or lower proportions of children with chronic disorders represent a substantive finding or whether they result from methodological problems shared by the ways in which the definitions are operationalized.

AB - Objectives. - To compare the application of 4 different definitions of chronic conditions and disabilities in children using a large national database. Methods. - The study used data on children 0-17 years of age from the 1994 and 1995 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) Core Interview and Disability Supplement. We selected items to create algorithms that operationalized 4 extant definitions and compared the proportions of children identified by each. For each definition we conducted bivariate and logistic regression analyses of age and sociodemographic and health-related characteristics potentially related to presence of disability. We then compared the results across definitions to determine if they were equally likely to identify children across a full range of sociodemographic variables, ages, and health-related characteristics. We also examined the level of agreement among definitions and determined the degree to which they identified the same or different children. Results. - Using a single data set, the 4 operational definitions identified somewhat different proportions of children as having chronic conditions or disability overall (the range was 13.7%-17%). However, the ways in which the definitions identified children along a spectrum of variables did not differ substantially across the definitions. The percent agreement in identification between any two individual definitions was ≥95%. In general, a higher proportion of children were identified among males, whites, those in older age groups, and among those whose parents had lower levels of education and those who were living below the poverty level. Although the same set of variables identified children with conditions who fit all 4 definitions compared with children who met the criteria for 1 to 3 definitions, higher rather than lower parent education was associated with agreement across all definitions. Conclusions. - Little has been known about the comparability of different definitions for identifying children with chronic conditions, special health care needs, and disability. Our findings suggest substantial overlap in the numbers and characteristics of the children that several different conceptual definitions identify. It remains unclear whether subgroups with higher or lower proportions of children with chronic disorders represent a substantive finding or whether they result from methodological problems shared by the ways in which the definitions are operationalized.

KW - Children with special health care needs

KW - Chronic conditions

KW - Definitions

KW - Disability

KW - Population survey

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036358933&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036358933&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1367/1539-4409(2002)002<0063:CDDOCC>2.0.CO;2

DO - 10.1367/1539-4409(2002)002<0063:CDDOCC>2.0.CO;2

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 63

EP - 70

JO - Academic Pediatrics

JF - Academic Pediatrics

SN - 1876-2859

IS - 1

ER -