Comparative Effectiveness of Patient-Controlled Analgesia for Treating Acute Pain in the Emergency Department

Polly E. Bijur, Angela M. Mills, Andrew K. Chang, Deborah White, Andrew J. Restivo, Shaun Persaud, Clyde B. Schechter, E. John Gallagher, Adrienne J. Birnbaum

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study objective: We assess the effectiveness of patient-controlled analgesia in the emergency department (ED). We hypothesized that decline in pain intensity from 30 to 120 minutes after initial intravenous opioid administration is greater in patients receiving morphine by patient-controlled analgesia compared with usual care and would differ by a clinically significant amount. Method: This was a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of patient-controlled analgesia and usual care (opioid and dose at physician's discretion) in 4 EDs. Entry criteria included age 18 to 65 years and acute pain requiring intravenous opioids. The primary outcome was decline in numeric rating scale pain score 30 to 120 minutes postbaseline. Secondary outcomes included satisfaction, time to analgesia, adverse events, and patient-controlled analgesia pump-related problems. We used a mixed-effects linear model to compare rate of decline in pain (slope) between groups. A clinically significant difference between groups was defined as a difference in slopes equivalent to 1.3 numeric rating scale units. Results: Six hundred thirty-six patients were enrolled. The rate of decline in pain from 30 to 120 minutes was greater for patients receiving patient-controlled analgesia than usual care (difference=1.0 numeric rating scale unit; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.6 to 1.5; P<.001) but did not reach the threshold for clinical significance. More patients receiving patient-controlled analgesia were satisfied with pain management (difference=9.3%; 95% CI 3.3% to 15.1%). Median time to initial analgesia was 15 minutes longer for patient-controlled analgesia than usual care (95% CI 11.4 to 18.6 minutes). There were 7 adverse events in the patient-controlled analgesia group and 1 in the usual care group (difference=2.0%; 95% CI 0.04% to 3.9%), and 11 pump-programming errors. Conclusion: The findings of this study do not favor patient-controlled analgesia over usual ED care for acute pain management.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAnnals of Emergency Medicine
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Oct 28 2016

Fingerprint

Patient-Controlled Analgesia
Acute Pain
Hospital Emergency Service
Confidence Intervals
Opioid Analgesics
Pain
Pain Management
Analgesia
Emergency Medical Services
Intravenous Administration
Morphine
Linear Models
Randomized Controlled Trials
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Comparative Effectiveness of Patient-Controlled Analgesia for Treating Acute Pain in the Emergency Department. / Bijur, Polly E.; Mills, Angela M.; Chang, Andrew K.; White, Deborah; Restivo, Andrew J.; Persaud, Shaun; Schechter, Clyde B.; Gallagher, E. John; Birnbaum, Adrienne J.

In: Annals of Emergency Medicine, 28.10.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{326bc6c4a2634824a326b0480d2aa0c0,
title = "Comparative Effectiveness of Patient-Controlled Analgesia for Treating Acute Pain in the Emergency Department",
abstract = "Study objective: We assess the effectiveness of patient-controlled analgesia in the emergency department (ED). We hypothesized that decline in pain intensity from 30 to 120 minutes after initial intravenous opioid administration is greater in patients receiving morphine by patient-controlled analgesia compared with usual care and would differ by a clinically significant amount. Method: This was a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of patient-controlled analgesia and usual care (opioid and dose at physician's discretion) in 4 EDs. Entry criteria included age 18 to 65 years and acute pain requiring intravenous opioids. The primary outcome was decline in numeric rating scale pain score 30 to 120 minutes postbaseline. Secondary outcomes included satisfaction, time to analgesia, adverse events, and patient-controlled analgesia pump-related problems. We used a mixed-effects linear model to compare rate of decline in pain (slope) between groups. A clinically significant difference between groups was defined as a difference in slopes equivalent to 1.3 numeric rating scale units. Results: Six hundred thirty-six patients were enrolled. The rate of decline in pain from 30 to 120 minutes was greater for patients receiving patient-controlled analgesia than usual care (difference=1.0 numeric rating scale unit; 95{\%} confidence interval [CI] 0.6 to 1.5; P<.001) but did not reach the threshold for clinical significance. More patients receiving patient-controlled analgesia were satisfied with pain management (difference=9.3{\%}; 95{\%} CI 3.3{\%} to 15.1{\%}). Median time to initial analgesia was 15 minutes longer for patient-controlled analgesia than usual care (95{\%} CI 11.4 to 18.6 minutes). There were 7 adverse events in the patient-controlled analgesia group and 1 in the usual care group (difference=2.0{\%}; 95{\%} CI 0.04{\%} to 3.9{\%}), and 11 pump-programming errors. Conclusion: The findings of this study do not favor patient-controlled analgesia over usual ED care for acute pain management.",
author = "Bijur, {Polly E.} and Mills, {Angela M.} and Chang, {Andrew K.} and Deborah White and Restivo, {Andrew J.} and Shaun Persaud and Schechter, {Clyde B.} and Gallagher, {E. John} and Birnbaum, {Adrienne J.}",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.03.064",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Annals of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0196-0644",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative Effectiveness of Patient-Controlled Analgesia for Treating Acute Pain in the Emergency Department

AU - Bijur, Polly E.

AU - Mills, Angela M.

AU - Chang, Andrew K.

AU - White, Deborah

AU - Restivo, Andrew J.

AU - Persaud, Shaun

AU - Schechter, Clyde B.

AU - Gallagher, E. John

AU - Birnbaum, Adrienne J.

PY - 2016/10/28

Y1 - 2016/10/28

N2 - Study objective: We assess the effectiveness of patient-controlled analgesia in the emergency department (ED). We hypothesized that decline in pain intensity from 30 to 120 minutes after initial intravenous opioid administration is greater in patients receiving morphine by patient-controlled analgesia compared with usual care and would differ by a clinically significant amount. Method: This was a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of patient-controlled analgesia and usual care (opioid and dose at physician's discretion) in 4 EDs. Entry criteria included age 18 to 65 years and acute pain requiring intravenous opioids. The primary outcome was decline in numeric rating scale pain score 30 to 120 minutes postbaseline. Secondary outcomes included satisfaction, time to analgesia, adverse events, and patient-controlled analgesia pump-related problems. We used a mixed-effects linear model to compare rate of decline in pain (slope) between groups. A clinically significant difference between groups was defined as a difference in slopes equivalent to 1.3 numeric rating scale units. Results: Six hundred thirty-six patients were enrolled. The rate of decline in pain from 30 to 120 minutes was greater for patients receiving patient-controlled analgesia than usual care (difference=1.0 numeric rating scale unit; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.6 to 1.5; P<.001) but did not reach the threshold for clinical significance. More patients receiving patient-controlled analgesia were satisfied with pain management (difference=9.3%; 95% CI 3.3% to 15.1%). Median time to initial analgesia was 15 minutes longer for patient-controlled analgesia than usual care (95% CI 11.4 to 18.6 minutes). There were 7 adverse events in the patient-controlled analgesia group and 1 in the usual care group (difference=2.0%; 95% CI 0.04% to 3.9%), and 11 pump-programming errors. Conclusion: The findings of this study do not favor patient-controlled analgesia over usual ED care for acute pain management.

AB - Study objective: We assess the effectiveness of patient-controlled analgesia in the emergency department (ED). We hypothesized that decline in pain intensity from 30 to 120 minutes after initial intravenous opioid administration is greater in patients receiving morphine by patient-controlled analgesia compared with usual care and would differ by a clinically significant amount. Method: This was a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of patient-controlled analgesia and usual care (opioid and dose at physician's discretion) in 4 EDs. Entry criteria included age 18 to 65 years and acute pain requiring intravenous opioids. The primary outcome was decline in numeric rating scale pain score 30 to 120 minutes postbaseline. Secondary outcomes included satisfaction, time to analgesia, adverse events, and patient-controlled analgesia pump-related problems. We used a mixed-effects linear model to compare rate of decline in pain (slope) between groups. A clinically significant difference between groups was defined as a difference in slopes equivalent to 1.3 numeric rating scale units. Results: Six hundred thirty-six patients were enrolled. The rate of decline in pain from 30 to 120 minutes was greater for patients receiving patient-controlled analgesia than usual care (difference=1.0 numeric rating scale unit; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.6 to 1.5; P<.001) but did not reach the threshold for clinical significance. More patients receiving patient-controlled analgesia were satisfied with pain management (difference=9.3%; 95% CI 3.3% to 15.1%). Median time to initial analgesia was 15 minutes longer for patient-controlled analgesia than usual care (95% CI 11.4 to 18.6 minutes). There were 7 adverse events in the patient-controlled analgesia group and 1 in the usual care group (difference=2.0%; 95% CI 0.04% to 3.9%), and 11 pump-programming errors. Conclusion: The findings of this study do not favor patient-controlled analgesia over usual ED care for acute pain management.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020260825&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85020260825&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.03.064

DO - 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.03.064

M3 - Article

JO - Annals of Emergency Medicine

JF - Annals of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0196-0644

ER -