Comparative cardiovascular effects of midazolam and thiopental in healthy patients

Philip W. Lebowitz, M. E. Cote, A. L. Daniels, F. M. Ramsey, J. A. Martyn, R. S. Teplick, J. K. Davison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Midazolam, a water-soluble benzodiazepine that is shorter-acting, more potent, and less irritating to veins than diazepam, has been suggested for use for induction of anesthesia. The cardiovascular effects of an induction-sized dose (0.25 mg/kg) of midazolam in A.S.A. class I or II surgical patients (N = 11) sedated with morphine and N2 O-O2 were compared in a double-blind fashion with a similar group of patients (N = 9) receiving thiopental (4.0 mg/kg). Consistent with earlier studies, patients given thiopental experienced downward trends from base line in mean arterial pressure, stroke volume, cardiac output, and heart rate; mean right atrial pressure increased slightly, whereas systemic vascular resistance did not change. Induction of anesthesia with midazolam was associated with more gradual and less pronounced hemodynamic alteration; the only significant changes from base line were decreases in mean arterial pressure 5 and 10 minutes after injection. When the two groups were compared, no significant differences were found. Midazolam is, then, as acceptable for induction of anesthesia as thiopental from a hemodynamic point of view in A.S.A. class I and II patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)771-775
Number of pages5
JournalAnesthesia and Analgesia
Volume61
Issue number9
StatePublished - 1982
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Thiopental
Midazolam
Anesthesia
Arterial Pressure
Hemodynamics
Atrial Pressure
Diazepam
Benzodiazepines
Cardiac Output
Vascular Resistance
Stroke Volume
Morphine
Veins
Heart Rate
Injections
Water

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Lebowitz, P. W., Cote, M. E., Daniels, A. L., Ramsey, F. M., Martyn, J. A., Teplick, R. S., & Davison, J. K. (1982). Comparative cardiovascular effects of midazolam and thiopental in healthy patients. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 61(9), 771-775.

Comparative cardiovascular effects of midazolam and thiopental in healthy patients. / Lebowitz, Philip W.; Cote, M. E.; Daniels, A. L.; Ramsey, F. M.; Martyn, J. A.; Teplick, R. S.; Davison, J. K.

In: Anesthesia and Analgesia, Vol. 61, No. 9, 1982, p. 771-775.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lebowitz, PW, Cote, ME, Daniels, AL, Ramsey, FM, Martyn, JA, Teplick, RS & Davison, JK 1982, 'Comparative cardiovascular effects of midazolam and thiopental in healthy patients', Anesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 61, no. 9, pp. 771-775.
Lebowitz PW, Cote ME, Daniels AL, Ramsey FM, Martyn JA, Teplick RS et al. Comparative cardiovascular effects of midazolam and thiopental in healthy patients. Anesthesia and Analgesia. 1982;61(9):771-775.
Lebowitz, Philip W. ; Cote, M. E. ; Daniels, A. L. ; Ramsey, F. M. ; Martyn, J. A. ; Teplick, R. S. ; Davison, J. K. / Comparative cardiovascular effects of midazolam and thiopental in healthy patients. In: Anesthesia and Analgesia. 1982 ; Vol. 61, No. 9. pp. 771-775.
@article{81271857aa294e8291364579584e4401,
title = "Comparative cardiovascular effects of midazolam and thiopental in healthy patients",
abstract = "Midazolam, a water-soluble benzodiazepine that is shorter-acting, more potent, and less irritating to veins than diazepam, has been suggested for use for induction of anesthesia. The cardiovascular effects of an induction-sized dose (0.25 mg/kg) of midazolam in A.S.A. class I or II surgical patients (N = 11) sedated with morphine and N2 O-O2 were compared in a double-blind fashion with a similar group of patients (N = 9) receiving thiopental (4.0 mg/kg). Consistent with earlier studies, patients given thiopental experienced downward trends from base line in mean arterial pressure, stroke volume, cardiac output, and heart rate; mean right atrial pressure increased slightly, whereas systemic vascular resistance did not change. Induction of anesthesia with midazolam was associated with more gradual and less pronounced hemodynamic alteration; the only significant changes from base line were decreases in mean arterial pressure 5 and 10 minutes after injection. When the two groups were compared, no significant differences were found. Midazolam is, then, as acceptable for induction of anesthesia as thiopental from a hemodynamic point of view in A.S.A. class I and II patients.",
author = "Lebowitz, {Philip W.} and Cote, {M. E.} and Daniels, {A. L.} and Ramsey, {F. M.} and Martyn, {J. A.} and Teplick, {R. S.} and Davison, {J. K.}",
year = "1982",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "61",
pages = "771--775",
journal = "Anesthesia and Analgesia",
issn = "0003-2999",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative cardiovascular effects of midazolam and thiopental in healthy patients

AU - Lebowitz, Philip W.

AU - Cote, M. E.

AU - Daniels, A. L.

AU - Ramsey, F. M.

AU - Martyn, J. A.

AU - Teplick, R. S.

AU - Davison, J. K.

PY - 1982

Y1 - 1982

N2 - Midazolam, a water-soluble benzodiazepine that is shorter-acting, more potent, and less irritating to veins than diazepam, has been suggested for use for induction of anesthesia. The cardiovascular effects of an induction-sized dose (0.25 mg/kg) of midazolam in A.S.A. class I or II surgical patients (N = 11) sedated with morphine and N2 O-O2 were compared in a double-blind fashion with a similar group of patients (N = 9) receiving thiopental (4.0 mg/kg). Consistent with earlier studies, patients given thiopental experienced downward trends from base line in mean arterial pressure, stroke volume, cardiac output, and heart rate; mean right atrial pressure increased slightly, whereas systemic vascular resistance did not change. Induction of anesthesia with midazolam was associated with more gradual and less pronounced hemodynamic alteration; the only significant changes from base line were decreases in mean arterial pressure 5 and 10 minutes after injection. When the two groups were compared, no significant differences were found. Midazolam is, then, as acceptable for induction of anesthesia as thiopental from a hemodynamic point of view in A.S.A. class I and II patients.

AB - Midazolam, a water-soluble benzodiazepine that is shorter-acting, more potent, and less irritating to veins than diazepam, has been suggested for use for induction of anesthesia. The cardiovascular effects of an induction-sized dose (0.25 mg/kg) of midazolam in A.S.A. class I or II surgical patients (N = 11) sedated with morphine and N2 O-O2 were compared in a double-blind fashion with a similar group of patients (N = 9) receiving thiopental (4.0 mg/kg). Consistent with earlier studies, patients given thiopental experienced downward trends from base line in mean arterial pressure, stroke volume, cardiac output, and heart rate; mean right atrial pressure increased slightly, whereas systemic vascular resistance did not change. Induction of anesthesia with midazolam was associated with more gradual and less pronounced hemodynamic alteration; the only significant changes from base line were decreases in mean arterial pressure 5 and 10 minutes after injection. When the two groups were compared, no significant differences were found. Midazolam is, then, as acceptable for induction of anesthesia as thiopental from a hemodynamic point of view in A.S.A. class I and II patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019946731&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019946731&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 771

EP - 775

JO - Anesthesia and Analgesia

JF - Anesthesia and Analgesia

SN - 0003-2999

IS - 9

ER -