Comparable sustained virologic suppression between community- and academic-based HIV care settings

Carolyn Chu, Moonseong Heo, Alex Peshansky, Galina Umanski, Paul Meissner, Cindy Voss, Peter A. Selwyn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome epidemic in the United States is evolving because of factors such as aging and geographic diffusion. Provider shortages are also driving the restructuring of HIV care delivery away from specialized settings, and family medicine providers may play a larger role in the future. We attempted to compare the effectiveness of HIV treatment delivered at community versus hospital care settings. Methods: The outcome of interest was sustained virologic suppression defined as 2 consecutive HIV-1 RNA measurements ≤400 copies/mL within 1 year after antiretroviral initiation. We used data from the multistate HIV Research Network cohort to compare sustained virologic suppression outcomes among 15,047 HIV-infected adults followed from 2000 to 2008 at 5 community- and 8 academic hospital- based ambulatory care sites. Community-based sites were mostly staffed by family medicine and general internal medicine physicians with HIV expertise, whereas hospital sites were primarily staffed by infectious disease subspecialists. Multivariate mixed effects logistic regression controlling for potential confounding variables was applied to account for clustering effects of study sites. Results: In an unadjusted analysis the rate of sustained virologic suppression was significantly higher among subjects treated in community-based care settings: 1,646 of 2,314 (71.1%) versus 8,416 of 12,733 (66.1%) (P < .01). In the adjusted multivariate model with potential confounding variables, the rate was higher, although not statistically significant, in the community-based settings (adjusted odds ratio, 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 0.73-2.16). Conclusion: Antiretroviral therapy can be delivered effectively through community-based treatment settings. This finding is potentially important for new program development, shifting HIV care into community- based settings as the landscape of accountable care, health reform, and HIV funding and resources evolves.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)72-81
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

HIV
Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)
Medicine
Program Development
Health Care Reform
Community Hospital
Ambulatory Care
Internal Medicine
Communicable Diseases
Cluster Analysis
HIV-1
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
Therapeutics
Logistic Models
Odds Ratio
RNA
Confidence Intervals
Physicians
Research

Keywords

  • HIV
  • Primary health care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Family Practice

Cite this

Comparable sustained virologic suppression between community- and academic-based HIV care settings. / Chu, Carolyn; Heo, Moonseong; Peshansky, Alex; Umanski, Galina; Meissner, Paul; Voss, Cindy; Selwyn, Peter A.

In: Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, Vol. 28, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 72-81.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1d488bd48c0049eb96a83e01a523eb5b,
title = "Comparable sustained virologic suppression between community- and academic-based HIV care settings",
abstract = "Purpose: The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome epidemic in the United States is evolving because of factors such as aging and geographic diffusion. Provider shortages are also driving the restructuring of HIV care delivery away from specialized settings, and family medicine providers may play a larger role in the future. We attempted to compare the effectiveness of HIV treatment delivered at community versus hospital care settings. Methods: The outcome of interest was sustained virologic suppression defined as 2 consecutive HIV-1 RNA measurements ≤400 copies/mL within 1 year after antiretroviral initiation. We used data from the multistate HIV Research Network cohort to compare sustained virologic suppression outcomes among 15,047 HIV-infected adults followed from 2000 to 2008 at 5 community- and 8 academic hospital- based ambulatory care sites. Community-based sites were mostly staffed by family medicine and general internal medicine physicians with HIV expertise, whereas hospital sites were primarily staffed by infectious disease subspecialists. Multivariate mixed effects logistic regression controlling for potential confounding variables was applied to account for clustering effects of study sites. Results: In an unadjusted analysis the rate of sustained virologic suppression was significantly higher among subjects treated in community-based care settings: 1,646 of 2,314 (71.1{\%}) versus 8,416 of 12,733 (66.1{\%}) (P < .01). In the adjusted multivariate model with potential confounding variables, the rate was higher, although not statistically significant, in the community-based settings (adjusted odds ratio, 1.26; 95{\%} confidence interval, 0.73-2.16). Conclusion: Antiretroviral therapy can be delivered effectively through community-based treatment settings. This finding is potentially important for new program development, shifting HIV care into community- based settings as the landscape of accountable care, health reform, and HIV funding and resources evolves.",
keywords = "HIV, Primary health care",
author = "Carolyn Chu and Moonseong Heo and Alex Peshansky and Galina Umanski and Paul Meissner and Cindy Voss and Selwyn, {Peter A.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3122/jabfm.2015.01.140099",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "72--81",
journal = "Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine",
issn = "1557-2625",
publisher = "American Board of Family Medicine",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparable sustained virologic suppression between community- and academic-based HIV care settings

AU - Chu, Carolyn

AU - Heo, Moonseong

AU - Peshansky, Alex

AU - Umanski, Galina

AU - Meissner, Paul

AU - Voss, Cindy

AU - Selwyn, Peter A.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Purpose: The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome epidemic in the United States is evolving because of factors such as aging and geographic diffusion. Provider shortages are also driving the restructuring of HIV care delivery away from specialized settings, and family medicine providers may play a larger role in the future. We attempted to compare the effectiveness of HIV treatment delivered at community versus hospital care settings. Methods: The outcome of interest was sustained virologic suppression defined as 2 consecutive HIV-1 RNA measurements ≤400 copies/mL within 1 year after antiretroviral initiation. We used data from the multistate HIV Research Network cohort to compare sustained virologic suppression outcomes among 15,047 HIV-infected adults followed from 2000 to 2008 at 5 community- and 8 academic hospital- based ambulatory care sites. Community-based sites were mostly staffed by family medicine and general internal medicine physicians with HIV expertise, whereas hospital sites were primarily staffed by infectious disease subspecialists. Multivariate mixed effects logistic regression controlling for potential confounding variables was applied to account for clustering effects of study sites. Results: In an unadjusted analysis the rate of sustained virologic suppression was significantly higher among subjects treated in community-based care settings: 1,646 of 2,314 (71.1%) versus 8,416 of 12,733 (66.1%) (P < .01). In the adjusted multivariate model with potential confounding variables, the rate was higher, although not statistically significant, in the community-based settings (adjusted odds ratio, 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 0.73-2.16). Conclusion: Antiretroviral therapy can be delivered effectively through community-based treatment settings. This finding is potentially important for new program development, shifting HIV care into community- based settings as the landscape of accountable care, health reform, and HIV funding and resources evolves.

AB - Purpose: The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome epidemic in the United States is evolving because of factors such as aging and geographic diffusion. Provider shortages are also driving the restructuring of HIV care delivery away from specialized settings, and family medicine providers may play a larger role in the future. We attempted to compare the effectiveness of HIV treatment delivered at community versus hospital care settings. Methods: The outcome of interest was sustained virologic suppression defined as 2 consecutive HIV-1 RNA measurements ≤400 copies/mL within 1 year after antiretroviral initiation. We used data from the multistate HIV Research Network cohort to compare sustained virologic suppression outcomes among 15,047 HIV-infected adults followed from 2000 to 2008 at 5 community- and 8 academic hospital- based ambulatory care sites. Community-based sites were mostly staffed by family medicine and general internal medicine physicians with HIV expertise, whereas hospital sites were primarily staffed by infectious disease subspecialists. Multivariate mixed effects logistic regression controlling for potential confounding variables was applied to account for clustering effects of study sites. Results: In an unadjusted analysis the rate of sustained virologic suppression was significantly higher among subjects treated in community-based care settings: 1,646 of 2,314 (71.1%) versus 8,416 of 12,733 (66.1%) (P < .01). In the adjusted multivariate model with potential confounding variables, the rate was higher, although not statistically significant, in the community-based settings (adjusted odds ratio, 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 0.73-2.16). Conclusion: Antiretroviral therapy can be delivered effectively through community-based treatment settings. This finding is potentially important for new program development, shifting HIV care into community- based settings as the landscape of accountable care, health reform, and HIV funding and resources evolves.

KW - HIV

KW - Primary health care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920625568&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84920625568&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3122/jabfm.2015.01.140099

DO - 10.3122/jabfm.2015.01.140099

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 72

EP - 81

JO - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

JF - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

SN - 1557-2625

IS - 1

ER -