Community practice patterns for bacterial corneal ulcer evaluation and treatment

Jennifer Park, Kim M. Lee, Helen Zhou, Moriah Rabin, Kevin Jwo, William B. Burton, David C. Gritz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To examine current practice patterns in the management of bacterial keratitis among U.S. ophthalmologists and differences in the management and opinions between cornea specialists and non-cornea specialists. Methods: A questionnaire was distributed to randomly selected ophthalmologists in July 2011 using an online survey system. It inquired about the number of patients with corneal ulcers seen monthly, frequency of Gram staining and culturing corneal ulcers, maintenance of diagnostic supplies, opinions on when culturing is necessary for corneal ulcers, treatment preferences for different severities of bacterial corneal ulcers, and opinions regarding relative efficacy of fourth-generation fluoroquinolones and fortified broad-spectrum antibiotics. Results: One thousand seven hundred one surveys were distributed, and 486 (28.6%) surveys were returned. A minority of corneal ulcers was Gram stained (23.7%±34.1%, mean±SD) or cultured (35.1%±38.0%), but cornea specialists were more likely to perform both. The most popular antibiotic for the treatment of less severe ulcers was moxifloxacin (55.4%), and the most popular treatment of more severe ulcers was fortified broad-spectrum antibiotics (62.7%). Cornea specialists were significantly more likely than non-cornea specialists to prescribe fortified antibiotics for more severe corneal ulcers (78.1% vs. 53.7%, P<0.0001). A greater number of cornea specialists stated that fourth-generation fluoroquinolones were less effective than fortified antibiotics for the treatment of more severe corneal ulcers (79.6% of cornea specialists vs. 60.9% of non-cornea specialists, P<0.001). Conclusions: Cornea specialists and non-cornea specialists manage bacterial keratitis differently, with cornea specialists more likely to perform diagnostic testing and prescribe fortified broad-spectrum antibiotics for severe bacterial keratitis. Additional prospective studies demonstrating visual outcomes after differential treatment of bacterial keratitis are needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)12-18
Number of pages7
JournalEye and Contact Lens
Volume41
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 13 2015

Fingerprint

Corneal Ulcer
Cornea
Keratitis
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Therapeutics
Fluoroquinolones
Ulcer
Online Systems
Maintenance

Keywords

  • Bacterial keratitis
  • Compounding pharmacy
  • Corneal ulcer
  • Fluoroquinolones
  • Fortified antibiotics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Community practice patterns for bacterial corneal ulcer evaluation and treatment. / Park, Jennifer; Lee, Kim M.; Zhou, Helen; Rabin, Moriah; Jwo, Kevin; Burton, William B.; Gritz, David C.

In: Eye and Contact Lens, Vol. 41, No. 1, 13.01.2015, p. 12-18.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Park, Jennifer ; Lee, Kim M. ; Zhou, Helen ; Rabin, Moriah ; Jwo, Kevin ; Burton, William B. ; Gritz, David C. / Community practice patterns for bacterial corneal ulcer evaluation and treatment. In: Eye and Contact Lens. 2015 ; Vol. 41, No. 1. pp. 12-18.
@article{d67500b20a394c05840e9917d3ca5e36,
title = "Community practice patterns for bacterial corneal ulcer evaluation and treatment",
abstract = "Objective: To examine current practice patterns in the management of bacterial keratitis among U.S. ophthalmologists and differences in the management and opinions between cornea specialists and non-cornea specialists. Methods: A questionnaire was distributed to randomly selected ophthalmologists in July 2011 using an online survey system. It inquired about the number of patients with corneal ulcers seen monthly, frequency of Gram staining and culturing corneal ulcers, maintenance of diagnostic supplies, opinions on when culturing is necessary for corneal ulcers, treatment preferences for different severities of bacterial corneal ulcers, and opinions regarding relative efficacy of fourth-generation fluoroquinolones and fortified broad-spectrum antibiotics. Results: One thousand seven hundred one surveys were distributed, and 486 (28.6{\%}) surveys were returned. A minority of corneal ulcers was Gram stained (23.7{\%}±34.1{\%}, mean±SD) or cultured (35.1{\%}±38.0{\%}), but cornea specialists were more likely to perform both. The most popular antibiotic for the treatment of less severe ulcers was moxifloxacin (55.4{\%}), and the most popular treatment of more severe ulcers was fortified broad-spectrum antibiotics (62.7{\%}). Cornea specialists were significantly more likely than non-cornea specialists to prescribe fortified antibiotics for more severe corneal ulcers (78.1{\%} vs. 53.7{\%}, P<0.0001). A greater number of cornea specialists stated that fourth-generation fluoroquinolones were less effective than fortified antibiotics for the treatment of more severe corneal ulcers (79.6{\%} of cornea specialists vs. 60.9{\%} of non-cornea specialists, P<0.001). Conclusions: Cornea specialists and non-cornea specialists manage bacterial keratitis differently, with cornea specialists more likely to perform diagnostic testing and prescribe fortified broad-spectrum antibiotics for severe bacterial keratitis. Additional prospective studies demonstrating visual outcomes after differential treatment of bacterial keratitis are needed.",
keywords = "Bacterial keratitis, Compounding pharmacy, Corneal ulcer, Fluoroquinolones, Fortified antibiotics",
author = "Jennifer Park and Lee, {Kim M.} and Helen Zhou and Moriah Rabin and Kevin Jwo and Burton, {William B.} and Gritz, {David C.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1097/ICL.0000000000000059",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "12--18",
journal = "Eye and Contact Lense",
issn = "1542-2321",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Community practice patterns for bacterial corneal ulcer evaluation and treatment

AU - Park, Jennifer

AU - Lee, Kim M.

AU - Zhou, Helen

AU - Rabin, Moriah

AU - Jwo, Kevin

AU - Burton, William B.

AU - Gritz, David C.

PY - 2015/1/13

Y1 - 2015/1/13

N2 - Objective: To examine current practice patterns in the management of bacterial keratitis among U.S. ophthalmologists and differences in the management and opinions between cornea specialists and non-cornea specialists. Methods: A questionnaire was distributed to randomly selected ophthalmologists in July 2011 using an online survey system. It inquired about the number of patients with corneal ulcers seen monthly, frequency of Gram staining and culturing corneal ulcers, maintenance of diagnostic supplies, opinions on when culturing is necessary for corneal ulcers, treatment preferences for different severities of bacterial corneal ulcers, and opinions regarding relative efficacy of fourth-generation fluoroquinolones and fortified broad-spectrum antibiotics. Results: One thousand seven hundred one surveys were distributed, and 486 (28.6%) surveys were returned. A minority of corneal ulcers was Gram stained (23.7%±34.1%, mean±SD) or cultured (35.1%±38.0%), but cornea specialists were more likely to perform both. The most popular antibiotic for the treatment of less severe ulcers was moxifloxacin (55.4%), and the most popular treatment of more severe ulcers was fortified broad-spectrum antibiotics (62.7%). Cornea specialists were significantly more likely than non-cornea specialists to prescribe fortified antibiotics for more severe corneal ulcers (78.1% vs. 53.7%, P<0.0001). A greater number of cornea specialists stated that fourth-generation fluoroquinolones were less effective than fortified antibiotics for the treatment of more severe corneal ulcers (79.6% of cornea specialists vs. 60.9% of non-cornea specialists, P<0.001). Conclusions: Cornea specialists and non-cornea specialists manage bacterial keratitis differently, with cornea specialists more likely to perform diagnostic testing and prescribe fortified broad-spectrum antibiotics for severe bacterial keratitis. Additional prospective studies demonstrating visual outcomes after differential treatment of bacterial keratitis are needed.

AB - Objective: To examine current practice patterns in the management of bacterial keratitis among U.S. ophthalmologists and differences in the management and opinions between cornea specialists and non-cornea specialists. Methods: A questionnaire was distributed to randomly selected ophthalmologists in July 2011 using an online survey system. It inquired about the number of patients with corneal ulcers seen monthly, frequency of Gram staining and culturing corneal ulcers, maintenance of diagnostic supplies, opinions on when culturing is necessary for corneal ulcers, treatment preferences for different severities of bacterial corneal ulcers, and opinions regarding relative efficacy of fourth-generation fluoroquinolones and fortified broad-spectrum antibiotics. Results: One thousand seven hundred one surveys were distributed, and 486 (28.6%) surveys were returned. A minority of corneal ulcers was Gram stained (23.7%±34.1%, mean±SD) or cultured (35.1%±38.0%), but cornea specialists were more likely to perform both. The most popular antibiotic for the treatment of less severe ulcers was moxifloxacin (55.4%), and the most popular treatment of more severe ulcers was fortified broad-spectrum antibiotics (62.7%). Cornea specialists were significantly more likely than non-cornea specialists to prescribe fortified antibiotics for more severe corneal ulcers (78.1% vs. 53.7%, P<0.0001). A greater number of cornea specialists stated that fourth-generation fluoroquinolones were less effective than fortified antibiotics for the treatment of more severe corneal ulcers (79.6% of cornea specialists vs. 60.9% of non-cornea specialists, P<0.001). Conclusions: Cornea specialists and non-cornea specialists manage bacterial keratitis differently, with cornea specialists more likely to perform diagnostic testing and prescribe fortified broad-spectrum antibiotics for severe bacterial keratitis. Additional prospective studies demonstrating visual outcomes after differential treatment of bacterial keratitis are needed.

KW - Bacterial keratitis

KW - Compounding pharmacy

KW - Corneal ulcer

KW - Fluoroquinolones

KW - Fortified antibiotics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920837620&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84920837620&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000059

DO - 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000059

M3 - Article

C2 - 25536529

AN - SCOPUS:84920837620

VL - 41

SP - 12

EP - 18

JO - Eye and Contact Lense

JF - Eye and Contact Lense

SN - 1542-2321

IS - 1

ER -