Community capacity building and sustainability: Outcomes of community-based participatory research

Karen Hacker, Shalini A. Tendulkar, Catlin Rideout, Nazmim Bhuiya, Chau Trinh-Shevrin, Clara P. Savage, Milagro Grullon, Alvin H. Strelnick, Carolyn Leung, Ann DiGirolamo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: For communities, the value of communitybased participatory research (CBPR) is often manifested in the outcomes of increased capacity and sustainable adoption of evidence-based practices for social change. Educational opportunities that promote discourse between community and academic partners can help to advance CBPR and better define these outcomes. Objectives: This paper describes a community-academic conference to develop shared definitions of community capacity building and sustainability related to CBPR and to identify obstacles and facilitators to both. Methods: "Taking It to the Curbside: Engaging Communities to Create Sustainable Change for Health" was planned by five Clinical Translational Science Institutes and four community organizations. After a keynote presentation, breakout groups of community and academic members met to define community capacity building and sustainability, and to identify facilitators and barriers to achieving both. Groups were facilitated by researcher-community partner teams and conversations were recorded and transcribed. Qualitative analysis for thematic content was conducted by a subset of the planning committee. Results: Important findings included learning that (1) the concepts of capacity and sustainability were considered interconnected; (2) partnership was perceived as both a facilitator and an outcome of CBPR; (3) sustainability was linked to "transfer of knowledge" from one generation to another within a community; and (4) capacity and sustainability were enhanced when goals were shared and health outcomes were achieved. Conclusions: Community capacity building and sustainability are key outcomes of CBPR for communities. Co-learning opportunities that engage and mutually educate both community members and academics can be useful strategies for identifying meaningful strategies to achieve these outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)349-360
Number of pages12
JournalProgress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Community-Based Participatory Research
Capacity Building
sustainability
community
Research
Learning
Evidence-Based Practice
Health
educational opportunity
Social Change
health

Keywords

  • Community-based participatory research
  • Education
  • Power sharing
  • Process issues

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Education
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Community capacity building and sustainability : Outcomes of community-based participatory research. / Hacker, Karen; Tendulkar, Shalini A.; Rideout, Catlin; Bhuiya, Nazmim; Trinh-Shevrin, Chau; Savage, Clara P.; Grullon, Milagro; Strelnick, Alvin H.; Leung, Carolyn; DiGirolamo, Ann.

In: Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2012, p. 349-360.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hacker, K, Tendulkar, SA, Rideout, C, Bhuiya, N, Trinh-Shevrin, C, Savage, CP, Grullon, M, Strelnick, AH, Leung, C & DiGirolamo, A 2012, 'Community capacity building and sustainability: Outcomes of community-based participatory research', Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 349-360. https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2012.0048
Hacker, Karen ; Tendulkar, Shalini A. ; Rideout, Catlin ; Bhuiya, Nazmim ; Trinh-Shevrin, Chau ; Savage, Clara P. ; Grullon, Milagro ; Strelnick, Alvin H. ; Leung, Carolyn ; DiGirolamo, Ann. / Community capacity building and sustainability : Outcomes of community-based participatory research. In: Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action. 2012 ; Vol. 6, No. 3. pp. 349-360.
@article{5b7ff4d50b1341079327199a3e8a6020,
title = "Community capacity building and sustainability: Outcomes of community-based participatory research",
abstract = "Background: For communities, the value of communitybased participatory research (CBPR) is often manifested in the outcomes of increased capacity and sustainable adoption of evidence-based practices for social change. Educational opportunities that promote discourse between community and academic partners can help to advance CBPR and better define these outcomes. Objectives: This paper describes a community-academic conference to develop shared definitions of community capacity building and sustainability related to CBPR and to identify obstacles and facilitators to both. Methods: {"}Taking It to the Curbside: Engaging Communities to Create Sustainable Change for Health{"} was planned by five Clinical Translational Science Institutes and four community organizations. After a keynote presentation, breakout groups of community and academic members met to define community capacity building and sustainability, and to identify facilitators and barriers to achieving both. Groups were facilitated by researcher-community partner teams and conversations were recorded and transcribed. Qualitative analysis for thematic content was conducted by a subset of the planning committee. Results: Important findings included learning that (1) the concepts of capacity and sustainability were considered interconnected; (2) partnership was perceived as both a facilitator and an outcome of CBPR; (3) sustainability was linked to {"}transfer of knowledge{"} from one generation to another within a community; and (4) capacity and sustainability were enhanced when goals were shared and health outcomes were achieved. Conclusions: Community capacity building and sustainability are key outcomes of CBPR for communities. Co-learning opportunities that engage and mutually educate both community members and academics can be useful strategies for identifying meaningful strategies to achieve these outcomes.",
keywords = "Community-based participatory research, Education, Power sharing, Process issues",
author = "Karen Hacker and Tendulkar, {Shalini A.} and Catlin Rideout and Nazmim Bhuiya and Chau Trinh-Shevrin and Savage, {Clara P.} and Milagro Grullon and Strelnick, {Alvin H.} and Carolyn Leung and Ann DiGirolamo",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1353/cpr.2012.0048",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "349--360",
journal = "Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action",
issn = "1557-0541",
publisher = "Johns Hopkins University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Community capacity building and sustainability

T2 - Outcomes of community-based participatory research

AU - Hacker, Karen

AU - Tendulkar, Shalini A.

AU - Rideout, Catlin

AU - Bhuiya, Nazmim

AU - Trinh-Shevrin, Chau

AU - Savage, Clara P.

AU - Grullon, Milagro

AU - Strelnick, Alvin H.

AU - Leung, Carolyn

AU - DiGirolamo, Ann

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Background: For communities, the value of communitybased participatory research (CBPR) is often manifested in the outcomes of increased capacity and sustainable adoption of evidence-based practices for social change. Educational opportunities that promote discourse between community and academic partners can help to advance CBPR and better define these outcomes. Objectives: This paper describes a community-academic conference to develop shared definitions of community capacity building and sustainability related to CBPR and to identify obstacles and facilitators to both. Methods: "Taking It to the Curbside: Engaging Communities to Create Sustainable Change for Health" was planned by five Clinical Translational Science Institutes and four community organizations. After a keynote presentation, breakout groups of community and academic members met to define community capacity building and sustainability, and to identify facilitators and barriers to achieving both. Groups were facilitated by researcher-community partner teams and conversations were recorded and transcribed. Qualitative analysis for thematic content was conducted by a subset of the planning committee. Results: Important findings included learning that (1) the concepts of capacity and sustainability were considered interconnected; (2) partnership was perceived as both a facilitator and an outcome of CBPR; (3) sustainability was linked to "transfer of knowledge" from one generation to another within a community; and (4) capacity and sustainability were enhanced when goals were shared and health outcomes were achieved. Conclusions: Community capacity building and sustainability are key outcomes of CBPR for communities. Co-learning opportunities that engage and mutually educate both community members and academics can be useful strategies for identifying meaningful strategies to achieve these outcomes.

AB - Background: For communities, the value of communitybased participatory research (CBPR) is often manifested in the outcomes of increased capacity and sustainable adoption of evidence-based practices for social change. Educational opportunities that promote discourse between community and academic partners can help to advance CBPR and better define these outcomes. Objectives: This paper describes a community-academic conference to develop shared definitions of community capacity building and sustainability related to CBPR and to identify obstacles and facilitators to both. Methods: "Taking It to the Curbside: Engaging Communities to Create Sustainable Change for Health" was planned by five Clinical Translational Science Institutes and four community organizations. After a keynote presentation, breakout groups of community and academic members met to define community capacity building and sustainability, and to identify facilitators and barriers to achieving both. Groups were facilitated by researcher-community partner teams and conversations were recorded and transcribed. Qualitative analysis for thematic content was conducted by a subset of the planning committee. Results: Important findings included learning that (1) the concepts of capacity and sustainability were considered interconnected; (2) partnership was perceived as both a facilitator and an outcome of CBPR; (3) sustainability was linked to "transfer of knowledge" from one generation to another within a community; and (4) capacity and sustainability were enhanced when goals were shared and health outcomes were achieved. Conclusions: Community capacity building and sustainability are key outcomes of CBPR for communities. Co-learning opportunities that engage and mutually educate both community members and academics can be useful strategies for identifying meaningful strategies to achieve these outcomes.

KW - Community-based participatory research

KW - Education

KW - Power sharing

KW - Process issues

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867889013&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867889013&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1353/cpr.2012.0048

DO - 10.1353/cpr.2012.0048

M3 - Article

C2 - 22982848

AN - SCOPUS:84867889013

VL - 6

SP - 349

EP - 360

JO - Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action

JF - Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action

SN - 1557-0541

IS - 3

ER -