Cognitive reserve and appraisal in multiple sclerosis

Carolyn E. Schwartz, Erin Snook, Brian Quaranto, Ralph H B Benedict, Bruce D. Rapkin, Timothy Vollmer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Cognitive appraisal processes underlying self-report affect the interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. These processes are relevant to resilience and adaptability, and may relate to how cognitive reserve protects against disability in multiple sclerosis (MS). Objectives: To describe how passive and active indicators of cognitive reserve relate to QOL appraisal processes in MS. Methods: Cross-sectional data (n=860) were drawn from the North American Research Committee on MS (NARCOMS) Registry, from whom additional survey data were collected. Cognitive reserve was measured using the Stern and Sole-Padulles measures. Using the quality of life appraisal profile (QOLAP), we assessed how MS patients conceptualize their experiences and how that impacts how they report their quality of life. Multivariate analysis of variance was used to compare groups within sets of appraisal parameters, and t-tests or chi-square tests were used to compare mean item responses within appraisal parameters for continuous or dichotomous variables, respectively. Results: People high in passive or active reserve report different conceptualizations of QOL, different types of goals, and considering different types of experiences and standards of comparison in responding to QOL questionnaires, as compared to low-reserve individuals. Although item response patterns were slightly different between passive and active indicators, they generally reflect a tendency in high-reserve individuals to emphasize the positive, focus on aspects of their life that are more controllable, and less based in fantasy. Conclusions: MS patients high in cognitive reserve differ in their cognitive appraisals from their low reserve counterparts. These appraisal metrics may predict disease course and other important clinical outcomes in MS patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)36-44
Number of pages9
JournalMultiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
Volume2
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2013

Fingerprint

Cognitive Reserve
Multiple Sclerosis
Quality of Life
Fantasy
Chi-Square Distribution
Self Report
Registries
Analysis of Variance
Multivariate Analysis
Research

Keywords

  • Appraisal
  • Cognitive processes
  • Cognitive reserve
  • Multiple sclerosis
  • Quality of life

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neurology

Cite this

Schwartz, C. E., Snook, E., Quaranto, B., Benedict, R. H. B., Rapkin, B. D., & Vollmer, T. (2013). Cognitive reserve and appraisal in multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, 2(1), 36-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2012.07.006

Cognitive reserve and appraisal in multiple sclerosis. / Schwartz, Carolyn E.; Snook, Erin; Quaranto, Brian; Benedict, Ralph H B; Rapkin, Bruce D.; Vollmer, Timothy.

In: Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, Vol. 2, No. 1, 01.2013, p. 36-44.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schwartz, CE, Snook, E, Quaranto, B, Benedict, RHB, Rapkin, BD & Vollmer, T 2013, 'Cognitive reserve and appraisal in multiple sclerosis', Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 36-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2012.07.006
Schwartz, Carolyn E. ; Snook, Erin ; Quaranto, Brian ; Benedict, Ralph H B ; Rapkin, Bruce D. ; Vollmer, Timothy. / Cognitive reserve and appraisal in multiple sclerosis. In: Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders. 2013 ; Vol. 2, No. 1. pp. 36-44.
@article{fad716982d3f41d589f8c97e3f88a585,
title = "Cognitive reserve and appraisal in multiple sclerosis",
abstract = "Background: Cognitive appraisal processes underlying self-report affect the interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. These processes are relevant to resilience and adaptability, and may relate to how cognitive reserve protects against disability in multiple sclerosis (MS). Objectives: To describe how passive and active indicators of cognitive reserve relate to QOL appraisal processes in MS. Methods: Cross-sectional data (n=860) were drawn from the North American Research Committee on MS (NARCOMS) Registry, from whom additional survey data were collected. Cognitive reserve was measured using the Stern and Sole-Padulles measures. Using the quality of life appraisal profile (QOLAP), we assessed how MS patients conceptualize their experiences and how that impacts how they report their quality of life. Multivariate analysis of variance was used to compare groups within sets of appraisal parameters, and t-tests or chi-square tests were used to compare mean item responses within appraisal parameters for continuous or dichotomous variables, respectively. Results: People high in passive or active reserve report different conceptualizations of QOL, different types of goals, and considering different types of experiences and standards of comparison in responding to QOL questionnaires, as compared to low-reserve individuals. Although item response patterns were slightly different between passive and active indicators, they generally reflect a tendency in high-reserve individuals to emphasize the positive, focus on aspects of their life that are more controllable, and less based in fantasy. Conclusions: MS patients high in cognitive reserve differ in their cognitive appraisals from their low reserve counterparts. These appraisal metrics may predict disease course and other important clinical outcomes in MS patients.",
keywords = "Appraisal, Cognitive processes, Cognitive reserve, Multiple sclerosis, Quality of life",
author = "Schwartz, {Carolyn E.} and Erin Snook and Brian Quaranto and Benedict, {Ralph H B} and Rapkin, {Bruce D.} and Timothy Vollmer",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.msard.2012.07.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "36--44",
journal = "Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders",
issn = "2211-0348",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cognitive reserve and appraisal in multiple sclerosis

AU - Schwartz, Carolyn E.

AU - Snook, Erin

AU - Quaranto, Brian

AU - Benedict, Ralph H B

AU - Rapkin, Bruce D.

AU - Vollmer, Timothy

PY - 2013/1

Y1 - 2013/1

N2 - Background: Cognitive appraisal processes underlying self-report affect the interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. These processes are relevant to resilience and adaptability, and may relate to how cognitive reserve protects against disability in multiple sclerosis (MS). Objectives: To describe how passive and active indicators of cognitive reserve relate to QOL appraisal processes in MS. Methods: Cross-sectional data (n=860) were drawn from the North American Research Committee on MS (NARCOMS) Registry, from whom additional survey data were collected. Cognitive reserve was measured using the Stern and Sole-Padulles measures. Using the quality of life appraisal profile (QOLAP), we assessed how MS patients conceptualize their experiences and how that impacts how they report their quality of life. Multivariate analysis of variance was used to compare groups within sets of appraisal parameters, and t-tests or chi-square tests were used to compare mean item responses within appraisal parameters for continuous or dichotomous variables, respectively. Results: People high in passive or active reserve report different conceptualizations of QOL, different types of goals, and considering different types of experiences and standards of comparison in responding to QOL questionnaires, as compared to low-reserve individuals. Although item response patterns were slightly different between passive and active indicators, they generally reflect a tendency in high-reserve individuals to emphasize the positive, focus on aspects of their life that are more controllable, and less based in fantasy. Conclusions: MS patients high in cognitive reserve differ in their cognitive appraisals from their low reserve counterparts. These appraisal metrics may predict disease course and other important clinical outcomes in MS patients.

AB - Background: Cognitive appraisal processes underlying self-report affect the interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. These processes are relevant to resilience and adaptability, and may relate to how cognitive reserve protects against disability in multiple sclerosis (MS). Objectives: To describe how passive and active indicators of cognitive reserve relate to QOL appraisal processes in MS. Methods: Cross-sectional data (n=860) were drawn from the North American Research Committee on MS (NARCOMS) Registry, from whom additional survey data were collected. Cognitive reserve was measured using the Stern and Sole-Padulles measures. Using the quality of life appraisal profile (QOLAP), we assessed how MS patients conceptualize their experiences and how that impacts how they report their quality of life. Multivariate analysis of variance was used to compare groups within sets of appraisal parameters, and t-tests or chi-square tests were used to compare mean item responses within appraisal parameters for continuous or dichotomous variables, respectively. Results: People high in passive or active reserve report different conceptualizations of QOL, different types of goals, and considering different types of experiences and standards of comparison in responding to QOL questionnaires, as compared to low-reserve individuals. Although item response patterns were slightly different between passive and active indicators, they generally reflect a tendency in high-reserve individuals to emphasize the positive, focus on aspects of their life that are more controllable, and less based in fantasy. Conclusions: MS patients high in cognitive reserve differ in their cognitive appraisals from their low reserve counterparts. These appraisal metrics may predict disease course and other important clinical outcomes in MS patients.

KW - Appraisal

KW - Cognitive processes

KW - Cognitive reserve

KW - Multiple sclerosis

KW - Quality of life

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866684516&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866684516&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.msard.2012.07.006

DO - 10.1016/j.msard.2012.07.006

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 36

EP - 44

JO - Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders

JF - Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders

SN - 2211-0348

IS - 1

ER -