Clinically meaningful change in stair negotiation performance in older adults

Mooyeon Oh-Park, Subashan Perera, Joe Verghese

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Stair negotiation is a key marker for independence among older adults; however, clinically meaningful change has not been established. Our objective was to establish the values of clinically meaningful change in stair negotiation time using distribution- and anchor-based approaches.Study participants were 371 community residing older adults (age. ≥. 70) in the Einstein Aging Study with time to ascend and descend 3 steps measured at baseline and at one-year follow-up. Anchor-based estimates were obtained using functional decline (defined as one-point increment in disability score) and change in self-reported walking ability over the one-year follow-up period. Small, moderate, and large meaningful change estimates were 0.28, 0.71, and 1.15. s for stair ascent time (0.31, 0.78, and 1.25. s for stair descent time) using the distribution-based approach of effect size. The estimates of meaningful decline range from 0.47 to 0.53. s for stair ascent time (0.33-0.53. s for stair descent time) using the anchor-based approach. The estimates of meaningful improvement were smaller (0.13-0.18. s for stair ascent, 0.06-0.15 for stair descent) compared to those for decline. Based on general consistency between distribution- and anchor-based approaches, preliminary criteria suggested for stair negotiation time is 0.5. s for meaningful decline and 0.2. s for meaningful improvement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)532-536
Number of pages5
JournalGait and Posture
Volume36
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2012

Fingerprint

Negotiating
Aptitude
Walking

Keywords

  • Aged
  • Meaningful change
  • Stair negotiation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Rehabilitation
  • Biophysics

Cite this

Clinically meaningful change in stair negotiation performance in older adults. / Oh-Park, Mooyeon; Perera, Subashan; Verghese, Joe.

In: Gait and Posture, Vol. 36, No. 3, 07.2012, p. 532-536.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Oh-Park, Mooyeon ; Perera, Subashan ; Verghese, Joe. / Clinically meaningful change in stair negotiation performance in older adults. In: Gait and Posture. 2012 ; Vol. 36, No. 3. pp. 532-536.
@article{a1c0d034c8a143c298fc49fefc04918f,
title = "Clinically meaningful change in stair negotiation performance in older adults",
abstract = "Stair negotiation is a key marker for independence among older adults; however, clinically meaningful change has not been established. Our objective was to establish the values of clinically meaningful change in stair negotiation time using distribution- and anchor-based approaches.Study participants were 371 community residing older adults (age. ≥. 70) in the Einstein Aging Study with time to ascend and descend 3 steps measured at baseline and at one-year follow-up. Anchor-based estimates were obtained using functional decline (defined as one-point increment in disability score) and change in self-reported walking ability over the one-year follow-up period. Small, moderate, and large meaningful change estimates were 0.28, 0.71, and 1.15. s for stair ascent time (0.31, 0.78, and 1.25. s for stair descent time) using the distribution-based approach of effect size. The estimates of meaningful decline range from 0.47 to 0.53. s for stair ascent time (0.33-0.53. s for stair descent time) using the anchor-based approach. The estimates of meaningful improvement were smaller (0.13-0.18. s for stair ascent, 0.06-0.15 for stair descent) compared to those for decline. Based on general consistency between distribution- and anchor-based approaches, preliminary criteria suggested for stair negotiation time is 0.5. s for meaningful decline and 0.2. s for meaningful improvement.",
keywords = "Aged, Meaningful change, Stair negotiation",
author = "Mooyeon Oh-Park and Subashan Perera and Joe Verghese",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.05.015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "532--536",
journal = "Gait and Posture",
issn = "0966-6362",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinically meaningful change in stair negotiation performance in older adults

AU - Oh-Park, Mooyeon

AU - Perera, Subashan

AU - Verghese, Joe

PY - 2012/7

Y1 - 2012/7

N2 - Stair negotiation is a key marker for independence among older adults; however, clinically meaningful change has not been established. Our objective was to establish the values of clinically meaningful change in stair negotiation time using distribution- and anchor-based approaches.Study participants were 371 community residing older adults (age. ≥. 70) in the Einstein Aging Study with time to ascend and descend 3 steps measured at baseline and at one-year follow-up. Anchor-based estimates were obtained using functional decline (defined as one-point increment in disability score) and change in self-reported walking ability over the one-year follow-up period. Small, moderate, and large meaningful change estimates were 0.28, 0.71, and 1.15. s for stair ascent time (0.31, 0.78, and 1.25. s for stair descent time) using the distribution-based approach of effect size. The estimates of meaningful decline range from 0.47 to 0.53. s for stair ascent time (0.33-0.53. s for stair descent time) using the anchor-based approach. The estimates of meaningful improvement were smaller (0.13-0.18. s for stair ascent, 0.06-0.15 for stair descent) compared to those for decline. Based on general consistency between distribution- and anchor-based approaches, preliminary criteria suggested for stair negotiation time is 0.5. s for meaningful decline and 0.2. s for meaningful improvement.

AB - Stair negotiation is a key marker for independence among older adults; however, clinically meaningful change has not been established. Our objective was to establish the values of clinically meaningful change in stair negotiation time using distribution- and anchor-based approaches.Study participants were 371 community residing older adults (age. ≥. 70) in the Einstein Aging Study with time to ascend and descend 3 steps measured at baseline and at one-year follow-up. Anchor-based estimates were obtained using functional decline (defined as one-point increment in disability score) and change in self-reported walking ability over the one-year follow-up period. Small, moderate, and large meaningful change estimates were 0.28, 0.71, and 1.15. s for stair ascent time (0.31, 0.78, and 1.25. s for stair descent time) using the distribution-based approach of effect size. The estimates of meaningful decline range from 0.47 to 0.53. s for stair ascent time (0.33-0.53. s for stair descent time) using the anchor-based approach. The estimates of meaningful improvement were smaller (0.13-0.18. s for stair ascent, 0.06-0.15 for stair descent) compared to those for decline. Based on general consistency between distribution- and anchor-based approaches, preliminary criteria suggested for stair negotiation time is 0.5. s for meaningful decline and 0.2. s for meaningful improvement.

KW - Aged

KW - Meaningful change

KW - Stair negotiation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864375375&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864375375&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.05.015

DO - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.05.015

M3 - Article

C2 - 22748468

AN - SCOPUS:84864375375

VL - 36

SP - 532

EP - 536

JO - Gait and Posture

JF - Gait and Posture

SN - 0966-6362

IS - 3

ER -