Clinical significance of incidental findings on coronary CT angiography: Insights from a randomized controlled trial

Lauren H. Goldman, Rikah Lerer, Cyrus Shabrang, Mark I. Travin, Jeffrey M. Levsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The effect of incidental findings from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) on management has not been rigorously investigated. This study uses a control group to explore this relationship. Methods: Analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial of acute chest pain patients admitted to telemetry was performed. Patients were randomized to undergo either CCTA (n = 200) or radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) (n = 200). Incidental findings were determined from imaging reports. Records were reviewed to determine subsequent management and imaging during and after hospitalization. Comparisons were performed using Fischer’s exact tests. Results: 386 incidental findings were found among 187 CCTA studies. No extra-cardiac incidental findings were noted in the MPI arm, which served as an effective control group. There were significantly more non-coronary medical workups during admission in the CCTA group compared to the MPI group [20% (39) vs. 12% (23), P = 0.038]. CCTA patients underwent significantly more resting echocardiography during the inpatient workup compared to the MPI group [38% (75) vs. 18% (55), P = 0.042]. CCTA patients underwent significantly more non-contrast chest CT exams in the year following admission compared to MPI patients [14% (27) vs. 7% (13) P = 0.029]. Conclusions: Incidental findings on inpatient CCTAs performed for chest pain have a significant impact on treatment and imaging during and following hospital admission.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Nuclear Cardiology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Incidental Findings
Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
Coronary Angiography
Randomized Controlled Trials
Chest Pain
Inpatients
Telemetry
Control Groups
Acute Pain
Radioisotopes
Echocardiography
Computed Tomography Angiography
Hospitalization
Arm
Thorax

Keywords

  • CAD
  • CT
  • Image interpretation
  • MPI

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

@article{c4f98b13088d4a45a05f1c26c9385505,
title = "Clinical significance of incidental findings on coronary CT angiography: Insights from a randomized controlled trial",
abstract = "Background: The effect of incidental findings from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) on management has not been rigorously investigated. This study uses a control group to explore this relationship. Methods: Analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial of acute chest pain patients admitted to telemetry was performed. Patients were randomized to undergo either CCTA (n = 200) or radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) (n = 200). Incidental findings were determined from imaging reports. Records were reviewed to determine subsequent management and imaging during and after hospitalization. Comparisons were performed using Fischer’s exact tests. Results: 386 incidental findings were found among 187 CCTA studies. No extra-cardiac incidental findings were noted in the MPI arm, which served as an effective control group. There were significantly more non-coronary medical workups during admission in the CCTA group compared to the MPI group [20{\%} (39) vs. 12{\%} (23), P = 0.038]. CCTA patients underwent significantly more resting echocardiography during the inpatient workup compared to the MPI group [38{\%} (75) vs. 18{\%} (55), P = 0.042]. CCTA patients underwent significantly more non-contrast chest CT exams in the year following admission compared to MPI patients [14{\%} (27) vs. 7{\%} (13) P = 0.029]. Conclusions: Incidental findings on inpatient CCTAs performed for chest pain have a significant impact on treatment and imaging during and following hospital admission.",
keywords = "CAD, CT, Image interpretation, MPI",
author = "Goldman, {Lauren H.} and Rikah Lerer and Cyrus Shabrang and Travin, {Mark I.} and Levsky, {Jeffrey M.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s12350-019-01647-6",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Nuclear Cardiology",
issn = "1071-3581",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical significance of incidental findings on coronary CT angiography

T2 - Insights from a randomized controlled trial

AU - Goldman, Lauren H.

AU - Lerer, Rikah

AU - Shabrang, Cyrus

AU - Travin, Mark I.

AU - Levsky, Jeffrey M.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: The effect of incidental findings from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) on management has not been rigorously investigated. This study uses a control group to explore this relationship. Methods: Analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial of acute chest pain patients admitted to telemetry was performed. Patients were randomized to undergo either CCTA (n = 200) or radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) (n = 200). Incidental findings were determined from imaging reports. Records were reviewed to determine subsequent management and imaging during and after hospitalization. Comparisons were performed using Fischer’s exact tests. Results: 386 incidental findings were found among 187 CCTA studies. No extra-cardiac incidental findings were noted in the MPI arm, which served as an effective control group. There were significantly more non-coronary medical workups during admission in the CCTA group compared to the MPI group [20% (39) vs. 12% (23), P = 0.038]. CCTA patients underwent significantly more resting echocardiography during the inpatient workup compared to the MPI group [38% (75) vs. 18% (55), P = 0.042]. CCTA patients underwent significantly more non-contrast chest CT exams in the year following admission compared to MPI patients [14% (27) vs. 7% (13) P = 0.029]. Conclusions: Incidental findings on inpatient CCTAs performed for chest pain have a significant impact on treatment and imaging during and following hospital admission.

AB - Background: The effect of incidental findings from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) on management has not been rigorously investigated. This study uses a control group to explore this relationship. Methods: Analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial of acute chest pain patients admitted to telemetry was performed. Patients were randomized to undergo either CCTA (n = 200) or radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) (n = 200). Incidental findings were determined from imaging reports. Records were reviewed to determine subsequent management and imaging during and after hospitalization. Comparisons were performed using Fischer’s exact tests. Results: 386 incidental findings were found among 187 CCTA studies. No extra-cardiac incidental findings were noted in the MPI arm, which served as an effective control group. There were significantly more non-coronary medical workups during admission in the CCTA group compared to the MPI group [20% (39) vs. 12% (23), P = 0.038]. CCTA patients underwent significantly more resting echocardiography during the inpatient workup compared to the MPI group [38% (75) vs. 18% (55), P = 0.042]. CCTA patients underwent significantly more non-contrast chest CT exams in the year following admission compared to MPI patients [14% (27) vs. 7% (13) P = 0.029]. Conclusions: Incidental findings on inpatient CCTAs performed for chest pain have a significant impact on treatment and imaging during and following hospital admission.

KW - CAD

KW - CT

KW - Image interpretation

KW - MPI

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065039051&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065039051&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12350-019-01647-6

DO - 10.1007/s12350-019-01647-6

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85065039051

JO - Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

JF - Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

SN - 1071-3581

ER -