Classification of amyloid-positivity in controls: Comparison of visual read and quantitative approaches

Ann D. Cohen, Wenzhu Bi Mowrey, Lisa A. Weissfeld, Howard J. Aizenstein, Eric McDade, James M. Mountz, Robert D. Nebes, Judith A. Saxton, Beth Snitz, Steven DeKosky, Jeff Williamson, Oscar L. Lopez, Julie C. Price, Chester A. Mathis, William E. Klunk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An important research application of amyloid imaging with positron emission tomography (PET) is detection of the earliest evidence of fibrillar amyloid-beta (Aβ) deposition. Use of amyloid PET for this purpose, requires a reproducible method for defining a cutoff that separates individuals with no significant Aβ deposition from those in which Aβ deposition has begun. We previously reported the iterative outlier approach (IO) for the analysis of Pittsburgh Compound-B (PiB) PET data. Developments in amyloid imaging since the initial report of IO have led us to re-examine the generalizability of this method. IO was developed using full-dynamic atrophy-corrected PiB PET data obtained from a group of control subjects with a fairly distinct separation between PiB-positive [PiB(+)] and PiB-negative [PiB(-)] subjects. Methods: We tested the performance of IO using late-summed tissue ratio data with atrophy correction or with an automated template method without atrophy correction and tested the robustness of the method when applied to a cohort of older subjects in which separation between PiB(+) and PiB(-) subjects was not so distinct. Results: The IO method did not perform consistently across analyses and performed particularly poorly when separation was less clear. We found that a sparse k-means (SKM) cluster analysis approach performed significantly better; performing more consistently across methods and subject cohorts. We also compared SKM to a consensus visual read approach and found very good correspondence. Conclusion: The visual read and SKM methods, applied together, may optimize the identification of early Aβ deposition. These methods have the potential to provide a standard approach to the detection of PiB-positivity that is generalizable across centers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)207-215
Number of pages9
JournalNeuroImage
Volume71
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Amyloid
Positron-Emission Tomography
Atrophy
2-(4'-(methylamino)phenyl)-6-hydroxybenzothiazole
Cluster Analysis
Control Groups
Research

Keywords

  • Amyloid
  • Cluster analysis
  • Pittsburgh compound B
  • Positron emission tomography
  • Visual read

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neurology

Cite this

Cohen, A. D., Mowrey, W. B., Weissfeld, L. A., Aizenstein, H. J., McDade, E., Mountz, J. M., ... Klunk, W. E. (2013). Classification of amyloid-positivity in controls: Comparison of visual read and quantitative approaches. NeuroImage, 71, 207-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.015

Classification of amyloid-positivity in controls : Comparison of visual read and quantitative approaches. / Cohen, Ann D.; Mowrey, Wenzhu Bi; Weissfeld, Lisa A.; Aizenstein, Howard J.; McDade, Eric; Mountz, James M.; Nebes, Robert D.; Saxton, Judith A.; Snitz, Beth; DeKosky, Steven; Williamson, Jeff; Lopez, Oscar L.; Price, Julie C.; Mathis, Chester A.; Klunk, William E.

In: NeuroImage, Vol. 71, 01.05.2013, p. 207-215.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cohen, AD, Mowrey, WB, Weissfeld, LA, Aizenstein, HJ, McDade, E, Mountz, JM, Nebes, RD, Saxton, JA, Snitz, B, DeKosky, S, Williamson, J, Lopez, OL, Price, JC, Mathis, CA & Klunk, WE 2013, 'Classification of amyloid-positivity in controls: Comparison of visual read and quantitative approaches', NeuroImage, vol. 71, pp. 207-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.015
Cohen, Ann D. ; Mowrey, Wenzhu Bi ; Weissfeld, Lisa A. ; Aizenstein, Howard J. ; McDade, Eric ; Mountz, James M. ; Nebes, Robert D. ; Saxton, Judith A. ; Snitz, Beth ; DeKosky, Steven ; Williamson, Jeff ; Lopez, Oscar L. ; Price, Julie C. ; Mathis, Chester A. ; Klunk, William E. / Classification of amyloid-positivity in controls : Comparison of visual read and quantitative approaches. In: NeuroImage. 2013 ; Vol. 71. pp. 207-215.
@article{7237e0e9f03740d3a7a4bf674bb6f61a,
title = "Classification of amyloid-positivity in controls: Comparison of visual read and quantitative approaches",
abstract = "An important research application of amyloid imaging with positron emission tomography (PET) is detection of the earliest evidence of fibrillar amyloid-beta (Aβ) deposition. Use of amyloid PET for this purpose, requires a reproducible method for defining a cutoff that separates individuals with no significant Aβ deposition from those in which Aβ deposition has begun. We previously reported the iterative outlier approach (IO) for the analysis of Pittsburgh Compound-B (PiB) PET data. Developments in amyloid imaging since the initial report of IO have led us to re-examine the generalizability of this method. IO was developed using full-dynamic atrophy-corrected PiB PET data obtained from a group of control subjects with a fairly distinct separation between PiB-positive [PiB(+)] and PiB-negative [PiB(-)] subjects. Methods: We tested the performance of IO using late-summed tissue ratio data with atrophy correction or with an automated template method without atrophy correction and tested the robustness of the method when applied to a cohort of older subjects in which separation between PiB(+) and PiB(-) subjects was not so distinct. Results: The IO method did not perform consistently across analyses and performed particularly poorly when separation was less clear. We found that a sparse k-means (SKM) cluster analysis approach performed significantly better; performing more consistently across methods and subject cohorts. We also compared SKM to a consensus visual read approach and found very good correspondence. Conclusion: The visual read and SKM methods, applied together, may optimize the identification of early Aβ deposition. These methods have the potential to provide a standard approach to the detection of PiB-positivity that is generalizable across centers.",
keywords = "Amyloid, Cluster analysis, Pittsburgh compound B, Positron emission tomography, Visual read",
author = "Cohen, {Ann D.} and Mowrey, {Wenzhu Bi} and Weissfeld, {Lisa A.} and Aizenstein, {Howard J.} and Eric McDade and Mountz, {James M.} and Nebes, {Robert D.} and Saxton, {Judith A.} and Beth Snitz and Steven DeKosky and Jeff Williamson and Lopez, {Oscar L.} and Price, {Julie C.} and Mathis, {Chester A.} and Klunk, {William E.}",
year = "2013",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "71",
pages = "207--215",
journal = "NeuroImage",
issn = "1053-8119",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Classification of amyloid-positivity in controls

T2 - Comparison of visual read and quantitative approaches

AU - Cohen, Ann D.

AU - Mowrey, Wenzhu Bi

AU - Weissfeld, Lisa A.

AU - Aizenstein, Howard J.

AU - McDade, Eric

AU - Mountz, James M.

AU - Nebes, Robert D.

AU - Saxton, Judith A.

AU - Snitz, Beth

AU - DeKosky, Steven

AU - Williamson, Jeff

AU - Lopez, Oscar L.

AU - Price, Julie C.

AU - Mathis, Chester A.

AU - Klunk, William E.

PY - 2013/5/1

Y1 - 2013/5/1

N2 - An important research application of amyloid imaging with positron emission tomography (PET) is detection of the earliest evidence of fibrillar amyloid-beta (Aβ) deposition. Use of amyloid PET for this purpose, requires a reproducible method for defining a cutoff that separates individuals with no significant Aβ deposition from those in which Aβ deposition has begun. We previously reported the iterative outlier approach (IO) for the analysis of Pittsburgh Compound-B (PiB) PET data. Developments in amyloid imaging since the initial report of IO have led us to re-examine the generalizability of this method. IO was developed using full-dynamic atrophy-corrected PiB PET data obtained from a group of control subjects with a fairly distinct separation between PiB-positive [PiB(+)] and PiB-negative [PiB(-)] subjects. Methods: We tested the performance of IO using late-summed tissue ratio data with atrophy correction or with an automated template method without atrophy correction and tested the robustness of the method when applied to a cohort of older subjects in which separation between PiB(+) and PiB(-) subjects was not so distinct. Results: The IO method did not perform consistently across analyses and performed particularly poorly when separation was less clear. We found that a sparse k-means (SKM) cluster analysis approach performed significantly better; performing more consistently across methods and subject cohorts. We also compared SKM to a consensus visual read approach and found very good correspondence. Conclusion: The visual read and SKM methods, applied together, may optimize the identification of early Aβ deposition. These methods have the potential to provide a standard approach to the detection of PiB-positivity that is generalizable across centers.

AB - An important research application of amyloid imaging with positron emission tomography (PET) is detection of the earliest evidence of fibrillar amyloid-beta (Aβ) deposition. Use of amyloid PET for this purpose, requires a reproducible method for defining a cutoff that separates individuals with no significant Aβ deposition from those in which Aβ deposition has begun. We previously reported the iterative outlier approach (IO) for the analysis of Pittsburgh Compound-B (PiB) PET data. Developments in amyloid imaging since the initial report of IO have led us to re-examine the generalizability of this method. IO was developed using full-dynamic atrophy-corrected PiB PET data obtained from a group of control subjects with a fairly distinct separation between PiB-positive [PiB(+)] and PiB-negative [PiB(-)] subjects. Methods: We tested the performance of IO using late-summed tissue ratio data with atrophy correction or with an automated template method without atrophy correction and tested the robustness of the method when applied to a cohort of older subjects in which separation between PiB(+) and PiB(-) subjects was not so distinct. Results: The IO method did not perform consistently across analyses and performed particularly poorly when separation was less clear. We found that a sparse k-means (SKM) cluster analysis approach performed significantly better; performing more consistently across methods and subject cohorts. We also compared SKM to a consensus visual read approach and found very good correspondence. Conclusion: The visual read and SKM methods, applied together, may optimize the identification of early Aβ deposition. These methods have the potential to provide a standard approach to the detection of PiB-positivity that is generalizable across centers.

KW - Amyloid

KW - Cluster analysis

KW - Pittsburgh compound B

KW - Positron emission tomography

KW - Visual read

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873688351&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873688351&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.015

DO - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.015

M3 - Article

C2 - 23353602

AN - SCOPUS:84873688351

VL - 71

SP - 207

EP - 215

JO - NeuroImage

JF - NeuroImage

SN - 1053-8119

ER -