TY - JOUR
T1 - Chronic migraine headache prevention with noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation
T2 - The EVENT study
AU - the EVENT Study Group
AU - Silberstein, Stephen D.
AU - Calhoun, Anne H.
AU - Lipton, Richard B.
AU - Grosberg, Brian M.
AU - Cady, Roger K.
AU - Dorlas, Stefanie
AU - Simmons, Kristy A.
AU - Mullin, Chris
AU - Liebler, Eric J.
AU - Goadsby, Peter J.
AU - Saper, Joel R.
N1 - Funding Information:
R. Lipton receives research support from the National Headache Foundation and the NIH: PO1AG003949 (program director), RO1AG025119 (investigator), RO1AG022374-06A2 (investigator), RO1AG034119 (investigator), and RO1AG12101 (investigator); serves on the editorial board of Neurology and as senior advisor to Headache; has reviewed for the National Institute on Aging and NINDS; holds stock options in eNeura, Inc.; and serves as a consultant or advisory board member or has received honoraria from Alder Biopharmaceuticals; Allergan, Inc.; American Headache Society; Amgen, Inc.; Autonomic Technologies, Inc.; Avanir Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Boston Scientific Corporation; CoLucid Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd.; electroCore, LLC; Eli Lilly and Company; eNeura Therapeutics; Informa; Merck & Co., Inc.; Teva Pharmaceuticals; and Vedanta Biosciences.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 American Academy of Neurology.
PY - 2016/8/2
Y1 - 2016/8/2
N2 - Objective: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and tolerability of noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) for the prevention of chronic migraine (CM) attacks. Methods: In this first prospective, multicenter, double-blind, sham-controlled pilot study of nVNS in CM prophylaxis, adults with CM (≥15 headache d/mo) entered the baseline phase (1 month) and were subsequently randomized to nVNS or sham treatment (2 months) before receiving open-label nVNS treatment (6 months). The primary endpoints were safety and tolerability. Efficacy endpoints in the intent-to-treat population included change in the number of headache days per 28 days and acute medication use. Results: Fifty-nine participants (mean age, 39.2 years; mean headache frequency, 21.5 d/mo) were enrolled. During the randomized phase, tolerability was similar for nVNS (n 30) and sham treatment (n 29). Most adverse events were mild/moderate and transient. Mean changes in the number of headache days were -1.4 (nVNS) and -0.2 (sham) (Δ 1.2; p 0.56). Twenty-seven participants completed the open-label phase. For the 15 completers initially assigned to nVNS, the mean change from baseline in headache days after 8 months of treatment was -7.9 (95% confidence interval -11.9 to -3.8; p < 0.01). Conclusions: Therapy with nVNS was well-tolerated with no safety issues. Persistent prophylactic use may reduce the number of headache days in CM; larger sham-controlled studies are needed. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01667250. Classification of evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that for patients with CM, nVNS is safe, is well-tolerated, and did not significantly change the number of headache days. This pilot study lacked the precision to exclude important safety issues or benefits of nVNS.
AB - Objective: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and tolerability of noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) for the prevention of chronic migraine (CM) attacks. Methods: In this first prospective, multicenter, double-blind, sham-controlled pilot study of nVNS in CM prophylaxis, adults with CM (≥15 headache d/mo) entered the baseline phase (1 month) and were subsequently randomized to nVNS or sham treatment (2 months) before receiving open-label nVNS treatment (6 months). The primary endpoints were safety and tolerability. Efficacy endpoints in the intent-to-treat population included change in the number of headache days per 28 days and acute medication use. Results: Fifty-nine participants (mean age, 39.2 years; mean headache frequency, 21.5 d/mo) were enrolled. During the randomized phase, tolerability was similar for nVNS (n 30) and sham treatment (n 29). Most adverse events were mild/moderate and transient. Mean changes in the number of headache days were -1.4 (nVNS) and -0.2 (sham) (Δ 1.2; p 0.56). Twenty-seven participants completed the open-label phase. For the 15 completers initially assigned to nVNS, the mean change from baseline in headache days after 8 months of treatment was -7.9 (95% confidence interval -11.9 to -3.8; p < 0.01). Conclusions: Therapy with nVNS was well-tolerated with no safety issues. Persistent prophylactic use may reduce the number of headache days in CM; larger sham-controlled studies are needed. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01667250. Classification of evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that for patients with CM, nVNS is safe, is well-tolerated, and did not significantly change the number of headache days. This pilot study lacked the precision to exclude important safety issues or benefits of nVNS.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84982943004&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84982943004&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002918
DO - 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002918
M3 - Article
C2 - 27412146
AN - SCOPUS:84982943004
SN - 0028-3878
VL - 87
SP - 529
EP - 538
JO - Neurology
JF - Neurology
IS - 5
ER -