Chronic daily headache in a tertiary care population: Correlation between the International Headache Society diagnostic criteria and proposed revisions of criteria for chronic daily headache

Marcelo E. Bigal, F. D. Sheftell, A. M. Rapoport, Richard B. Lipton, S. J. Tepper

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

84 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The International Headache Society (IHS) has been criticized for its approach to classification of chronic daily headache (CDH); Silberstein and Lipton criteria provide an alternative to this approach. The aim of this study is to apply the alternative diagnostic approaches to a sample of CDH patients consulting in specialty care. Our sample consisted of 638 patients with CDH. Patients were classified according to both classification systems. Patients were predominantly female (65.0%), with ages ranging from 11 to 88 years. According to the Silberstein and Lipton classification, we found eight different diagnoses. The most common diagnosis was chronic migraine (87.4%), followed by new daily persistent headache (10.8%). Just six patients had chronic tension-type headache (CTTH). Applying the IHS criteria we found 14 different diagnoses. Migraine was found in 576 (90.2%) patients. CTTH occurred in 621 (97.3%), with only 10 (1.57%) having this as the sole diagnosis. We conclude that both systems allow for the classification of most patients with CDH when daily headache diaries are available. The main difference is that the IHS classification is cumbersome and requires multiple diagnoses. The Silberstein and Lipton system is easier to apply, and more parsimonious. These findings support revision of the IHS classification system to include chronic migraine.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)432-438
Number of pages7
JournalCephalalgia
Volume22
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2002

Fingerprint

Headache Disorders
Tertiary Healthcare
Headache
Population
Migraine Disorders
Tension-Type Headache

Keywords

  • Chronic daily headache
  • Classification systems
  • HIS
  • Migraine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Chronic daily headache in a tertiary care population : Correlation between the International Headache Society diagnostic criteria and proposed revisions of criteria for chronic daily headache. / Bigal, Marcelo E.; Sheftell, F. D.; Rapoport, A. M.; Lipton, Richard B.; Tepper, S. J.

In: Cephalalgia, Vol. 22, No. 6, 07.2002, p. 432-438.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{badc6b409c0e4a778f4ccf6da583feaa,
title = "Chronic daily headache in a tertiary care population: Correlation between the International Headache Society diagnostic criteria and proposed revisions of criteria for chronic daily headache",
abstract = "The International Headache Society (IHS) has been criticized for its approach to classification of chronic daily headache (CDH); Silberstein and Lipton criteria provide an alternative to this approach. The aim of this study is to apply the alternative diagnostic approaches to a sample of CDH patients consulting in specialty care. Our sample consisted of 638 patients with CDH. Patients were classified according to both classification systems. Patients were predominantly female (65.0{\%}), with ages ranging from 11 to 88 years. According to the Silberstein and Lipton classification, we found eight different diagnoses. The most common diagnosis was chronic migraine (87.4{\%}), followed by new daily persistent headache (10.8{\%}). Just six patients had chronic tension-type headache (CTTH). Applying the IHS criteria we found 14 different diagnoses. Migraine was found in 576 (90.2{\%}) patients. CTTH occurred in 621 (97.3{\%}), with only 10 (1.57{\%}) having this as the sole diagnosis. We conclude that both systems allow for the classification of most patients with CDH when daily headache diaries are available. The main difference is that the IHS classification is cumbersome and requires multiple diagnoses. The Silberstein and Lipton system is easier to apply, and more parsimonious. These findings support revision of the IHS classification system to include chronic migraine.",
keywords = "Chronic daily headache, Classification systems, HIS, Migraine",
author = "Bigal, {Marcelo E.} and Sheftell, {F. D.} and Rapoport, {A. M.} and Lipton, {Richard B.} and Tepper, {S. J.}",
year = "2002",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1046/j.1468-2982.2002.00384.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "432--438",
journal = "Cephalalgia",
issn = "0333-1024",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Chronic daily headache in a tertiary care population

T2 - Correlation between the International Headache Society diagnostic criteria and proposed revisions of criteria for chronic daily headache

AU - Bigal, Marcelo E.

AU - Sheftell, F. D.

AU - Rapoport, A. M.

AU - Lipton, Richard B.

AU - Tepper, S. J.

PY - 2002/7

Y1 - 2002/7

N2 - The International Headache Society (IHS) has been criticized for its approach to classification of chronic daily headache (CDH); Silberstein and Lipton criteria provide an alternative to this approach. The aim of this study is to apply the alternative diagnostic approaches to a sample of CDH patients consulting in specialty care. Our sample consisted of 638 patients with CDH. Patients were classified according to both classification systems. Patients were predominantly female (65.0%), with ages ranging from 11 to 88 years. According to the Silberstein and Lipton classification, we found eight different diagnoses. The most common diagnosis was chronic migraine (87.4%), followed by new daily persistent headache (10.8%). Just six patients had chronic tension-type headache (CTTH). Applying the IHS criteria we found 14 different diagnoses. Migraine was found in 576 (90.2%) patients. CTTH occurred in 621 (97.3%), with only 10 (1.57%) having this as the sole diagnosis. We conclude that both systems allow for the classification of most patients with CDH when daily headache diaries are available. The main difference is that the IHS classification is cumbersome and requires multiple diagnoses. The Silberstein and Lipton system is easier to apply, and more parsimonious. These findings support revision of the IHS classification system to include chronic migraine.

AB - The International Headache Society (IHS) has been criticized for its approach to classification of chronic daily headache (CDH); Silberstein and Lipton criteria provide an alternative to this approach. The aim of this study is to apply the alternative diagnostic approaches to a sample of CDH patients consulting in specialty care. Our sample consisted of 638 patients with CDH. Patients were classified according to both classification systems. Patients were predominantly female (65.0%), with ages ranging from 11 to 88 years. According to the Silberstein and Lipton classification, we found eight different diagnoses. The most common diagnosis was chronic migraine (87.4%), followed by new daily persistent headache (10.8%). Just six patients had chronic tension-type headache (CTTH). Applying the IHS criteria we found 14 different diagnoses. Migraine was found in 576 (90.2%) patients. CTTH occurred in 621 (97.3%), with only 10 (1.57%) having this as the sole diagnosis. We conclude that both systems allow for the classification of most patients with CDH when daily headache diaries are available. The main difference is that the IHS classification is cumbersome and requires multiple diagnoses. The Silberstein and Lipton system is easier to apply, and more parsimonious. These findings support revision of the IHS classification system to include chronic migraine.

KW - Chronic daily headache

KW - Classification systems

KW - HIS

KW - Migraine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036636976&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036636976&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1046/j.1468-2982.2002.00384.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1468-2982.2002.00384.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 12133042

AN - SCOPUS:0036636976

VL - 22

SP - 432

EP - 438

JO - Cephalalgia

JF - Cephalalgia

SN - 0333-1024

IS - 6

ER -