Children's speech recognition in noise using omni-directional and dual- microphone hearing aid technology

Judith S. Gravel, Nancy Fausel, Christine Liskow, Janie Chobot

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

75 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine children's speech recognition abilities for words and sentences presented in background noise when the children used omni-directional and dual-microphone hearing aid technology. Design: Twenty children (ten 4- to 6-yr olds; ten 7- to 11-yr- olds) with bilateral cochlear hearing loss (average four-frequency hearing loss = 57.25 dB HL; range: mild to severe) were included in the study. An adaptive test procedure was used to estimate a signal to noise ratio (SNR) that reduced individual speech recognition ability to 50% in multi-talker background competition. Testing was completed with the child seated in a conventional audiologic test suite. A fixed level of the speech signal was delivered through a loudspeaker located at 0°; noise varying in 2 dB steps was presented at 180°. SNR was estimated for two types of speech materials (closed-set words and sentences). Children wore binaural programmable hearing aids (Phonak PiCS) and were tested in conventional omni-directional and dual- microphone ('Audio Zoom') conditions. Results: Significant effects of microphone condition, speech material type (words and sentences), and age group ('younger' and 'older') were revealed by mixed design analysis of variance. Overall, children received a mean advantage of 4.7 dB from listening in the dual-microphone condition. Children's performance was correlated with their chronological age and language age (receptive vocabulary) but not with their degree of hearing loss (except in one condition). Younger children required a more advantageous SNR to achieve the same performance criteria as older children. Conclusions: Under the specific test conditions used in this investigation, dual-microphone hearing aid technology provided a significant listening advantage in background competition over conventional omni-directional microphones for children with mild to severe cochlear hearing loss for both word and sentence test materials.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalEar and Hearing
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1999

Fingerprint

Hearing Aids
Noise
Technology
Signal-To-Noise Ratio
Aptitude
Sensorineural Hearing Loss
Hearing Loss
Bilateral Hearing Loss
Vocabulary
Analysis of Variance
Language
Age Groups

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Children's speech recognition in noise using omni-directional and dual- microphone hearing aid technology. / Gravel, Judith S.; Fausel, Nancy; Liskow, Christine; Chobot, Janie.

In: Ear and Hearing, Vol. 20, No. 1, 02.1999, p. 1-11.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gravel, Judith S. ; Fausel, Nancy ; Liskow, Christine ; Chobot, Janie. / Children's speech recognition in noise using omni-directional and dual- microphone hearing aid technology. In: Ear and Hearing. 1999 ; Vol. 20, No. 1. pp. 1-11.
@article{3aaa9f80ed5c499486d8a2addfb558b7,
title = "Children's speech recognition in noise using omni-directional and dual- microphone hearing aid technology",
abstract = "Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine children's speech recognition abilities for words and sentences presented in background noise when the children used omni-directional and dual-microphone hearing aid technology. Design: Twenty children (ten 4- to 6-yr olds; ten 7- to 11-yr- olds) with bilateral cochlear hearing loss (average four-frequency hearing loss = 57.25 dB HL; range: mild to severe) were included in the study. An adaptive test procedure was used to estimate a signal to noise ratio (SNR) that reduced individual speech recognition ability to 50{\%} in multi-talker background competition. Testing was completed with the child seated in a conventional audiologic test suite. A fixed level of the speech signal was delivered through a loudspeaker located at 0°; noise varying in 2 dB steps was presented at 180°. SNR was estimated for two types of speech materials (closed-set words and sentences). Children wore binaural programmable hearing aids (Phonak PiCS) and were tested in conventional omni-directional and dual- microphone ('Audio Zoom') conditions. Results: Significant effects of microphone condition, speech material type (words and sentences), and age group ('younger' and 'older') were revealed by mixed design analysis of variance. Overall, children received a mean advantage of 4.7 dB from listening in the dual-microphone condition. Children's performance was correlated with their chronological age and language age (receptive vocabulary) but not with their degree of hearing loss (except in one condition). Younger children required a more advantageous SNR to achieve the same performance criteria as older children. Conclusions: Under the specific test conditions used in this investigation, dual-microphone hearing aid technology provided a significant listening advantage in background competition over conventional omni-directional microphones for children with mild to severe cochlear hearing loss for both word and sentence test materials.",
author = "Gravel, {Judith S.} and Nancy Fausel and Christine Liskow and Janie Chobot",
year = "1999",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1097/00003446-199902000-00001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "1--11",
journal = "Ear and Hearing",
issn = "0196-0202",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Children's speech recognition in noise using omni-directional and dual- microphone hearing aid technology

AU - Gravel, Judith S.

AU - Fausel, Nancy

AU - Liskow, Christine

AU - Chobot, Janie

PY - 1999/2

Y1 - 1999/2

N2 - Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine children's speech recognition abilities for words and sentences presented in background noise when the children used omni-directional and dual-microphone hearing aid technology. Design: Twenty children (ten 4- to 6-yr olds; ten 7- to 11-yr- olds) with bilateral cochlear hearing loss (average four-frequency hearing loss = 57.25 dB HL; range: mild to severe) were included in the study. An adaptive test procedure was used to estimate a signal to noise ratio (SNR) that reduced individual speech recognition ability to 50% in multi-talker background competition. Testing was completed with the child seated in a conventional audiologic test suite. A fixed level of the speech signal was delivered through a loudspeaker located at 0°; noise varying in 2 dB steps was presented at 180°. SNR was estimated for two types of speech materials (closed-set words and sentences). Children wore binaural programmable hearing aids (Phonak PiCS) and were tested in conventional omni-directional and dual- microphone ('Audio Zoom') conditions. Results: Significant effects of microphone condition, speech material type (words and sentences), and age group ('younger' and 'older') were revealed by mixed design analysis of variance. Overall, children received a mean advantage of 4.7 dB from listening in the dual-microphone condition. Children's performance was correlated with their chronological age and language age (receptive vocabulary) but not with their degree of hearing loss (except in one condition). Younger children required a more advantageous SNR to achieve the same performance criteria as older children. Conclusions: Under the specific test conditions used in this investigation, dual-microphone hearing aid technology provided a significant listening advantage in background competition over conventional omni-directional microphones for children with mild to severe cochlear hearing loss for both word and sentence test materials.

AB - Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine children's speech recognition abilities for words and sentences presented in background noise when the children used omni-directional and dual-microphone hearing aid technology. Design: Twenty children (ten 4- to 6-yr olds; ten 7- to 11-yr- olds) with bilateral cochlear hearing loss (average four-frequency hearing loss = 57.25 dB HL; range: mild to severe) were included in the study. An adaptive test procedure was used to estimate a signal to noise ratio (SNR) that reduced individual speech recognition ability to 50% in multi-talker background competition. Testing was completed with the child seated in a conventional audiologic test suite. A fixed level of the speech signal was delivered through a loudspeaker located at 0°; noise varying in 2 dB steps was presented at 180°. SNR was estimated for two types of speech materials (closed-set words and sentences). Children wore binaural programmable hearing aids (Phonak PiCS) and were tested in conventional omni-directional and dual- microphone ('Audio Zoom') conditions. Results: Significant effects of microphone condition, speech material type (words and sentences), and age group ('younger' and 'older') were revealed by mixed design analysis of variance. Overall, children received a mean advantage of 4.7 dB from listening in the dual-microphone condition. Children's performance was correlated with their chronological age and language age (receptive vocabulary) but not with their degree of hearing loss (except in one condition). Younger children required a more advantageous SNR to achieve the same performance criteria as older children. Conclusions: Under the specific test conditions used in this investigation, dual-microphone hearing aid technology provided a significant listening advantage in background competition over conventional omni-directional microphones for children with mild to severe cochlear hearing loss for both word and sentence test materials.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032965578&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032965578&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00003446-199902000-00001

DO - 10.1097/00003446-199902000-00001

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 1

EP - 11

JO - Ear and Hearing

JF - Ear and Hearing

SN - 0196-0202

IS - 1

ER -